Hi
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 12/28/2013 10:29 AM, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 December 2013 14:02:43 Armin K. wrote:
>>> I've contacted the maintainers of clang-svn two weeks ago (see comments)
>>> but he didn't responded yet. I'd like you to disown clang-
On 12/28/2013 10:29 AM, Evgeniy Alekseev wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 December 2013 14:02:43 Armin K. wrote:
>> I've contacted the maintainers of clang-svn two weeks ago (see comments)
>> but he didn't responded yet. I'd like you to disown clang-svn so someone
>> else can step up maintaining, but since I
On Tuesday 24 December 2013 14:02:43 Armin K. wrote:
> I've contacted the maintainers of clang-svn two weeks ago (see comments)
> but he didn't responded yet. I'd like you to disown clang-svn so someone
> else can step up maintaining, but since I've asked maintainer of
> llvm-svn (which you can als
On 12/24/2013 02:02 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've contacted the maintainers of clang-svn two weeks ago (see comments)
> but he didn't responded yet. I'd like you to disown clang-svn so someone
> else can step up maintaining, but since I've asked maintainer of
> llvm-svn (which you can also
Hello,
I've contacted the maintainers of clang-svn two weeks ago (see comments)
but he didn't responded yet. I'd like you to disown clang-svn so someone
else can step up maintaining, but since I've asked maintainer of
llvm-svn (which you can also see in comments of llvm-svn package) to
merge clang
