On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
This is part informational, and part not.
We have a donated server from SevenL networks that has sat mostly
unused up until now. What we would like to do is more the AUR and
community on to that machine, so
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Eric Bélangersnowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
This is part informational, and part not.
We have a donated server from SevenL networks that has sat mostly
unused up until now.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 15:59, Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
Anything I'm missing? Suggestions as to a good date?
Sounds good to me. I don't have any requests for a specific date.
Looking forward to the improvements :)
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Daenyth Blankdaenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 15:59, Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
Anything I'm missing? Suggestions as to a good date?
Sounds good to me. I don't have any requests for a specific date.
Looking forward to the
On Thu 25 Jun 2009 00:03 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:
May i suggest something slightly relevant, but probably very radical?
Disable comments on AUR completely.
I dont think there is a question about its usefulness in [community],
not even TU's themselves
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.dewrote:
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote:
I propose keeping the readline rebuild in testing until the
AUR/community move is done.
I would prefer a strategy which wont block our repos. For example I
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitzpie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote:
I propose keeping the readline rebuild in testing until the
AUR/community move is done.
I would prefer a strategy which wont block our repos. For example I have
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitzpie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote:
I propose keeping the readline rebuild in testing until the
AUR/community move is done.
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitzpie...@archlinux.de wrote:
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote:
I propose keeping the readline rebuild in testing until the
AUR/community move is done.
I would prefer a strategy which wont
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
Just noting that that libjpeg being large is wrong as far as community goes:
84 rebuilds in community for readline
31 rebuilds in community for libjpeg
Yeesh, I wasn't aware - I thought it was only around 20 packages or so
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitzpie...@archlinux.de
wrote:
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote:
I propose keeping the readline rebuild in testing until the
Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote:
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitzpie...@archlinux.de
wrote:
On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote:
I propose keeping the
12 matches
Mail list logo