Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: Hey all, This is part informational, and part not. We have a donated server from SevenL networks that has sat mostly unused up until now. What we would like to do is more the AUR and community on to that machine, so

Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Eric Bélangersnowmanisc...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: Hey all, This is part informational, and part not. We have a donated server from SevenL networks that has sat mostly unused up until now.

Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 15:59, Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: Anything I'm missing? Suggestions as to a good date? Sounds good to me. I don't have any requests for a specific date. Looking forward to the improvements :)

Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Daenyth Blankdaenyth+a...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 15:59, Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: Anything I'm missing? Suggestions as to a good date? Sounds good to me. I don't have any requests for a specific date. Looking forward to the

Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Loui Chang
On Thu 25 Jun 2009 00:03 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: May i suggest something slightly relevant, but probably very radical? Disable comments on AUR completely. I dont think there is a question about its usefulness in [community], not even TU's themselves

Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Ronald van Haren
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Pierre Schmitz pie...@archlinux.dewrote: On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote: I propose keeping the readline rebuild in testing until the AUR/community move is done. I would prefer a strategy which wont block our repos. For example I

Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitzpie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote: I propose keeping the readline rebuild in testing until the AUR/community move is done. I would prefer a strategy which wont block our repos. For example I have

Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Aaron Griffinaaronmgrif...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitzpie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote: I propose keeping the readline rebuild in testing until the AUR/community move is done.

Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Allan McRae
Aaron Griffin wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitzpie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote: I propose keeping the readline rebuild in testing until the AUR/community move is done. I would prefer a strategy which wont

Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Aaron Griffin
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote: Just noting that that libjpeg being large is wrong as far as community goes: 84 rebuilds in community for readline 31 rebuilds in community for libjpeg Yeesh, I wasn't aware - I thought it was only around 20 packages or so

Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Eric Bélanger
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote: Aaron Griffin wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitzpie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote: I propose keeping the readline rebuild in testing until the

Re: [aur-general] Moving the AUR/community

2009-06-24 Thread Allan McRae
Eric Bélanger wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Allan McRaeal...@archlinux.org wrote: Aaron Griffin wrote: On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Pierre Schmitzpie...@archlinux.de wrote: On Wednesday 24 June 2009 21:18:25 Eric Bélanger wrote: I propose keeping the