Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Ankit R Gadiya
On 02/22/2018 11:04 PM, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: > > > On 02/22/2018 10:47 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> On 02/22/2018 12:12 PM, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: >>> On 02/22/2018 08:16 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: Naming scheme for vim plug-ins is always the other way around, >

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 02/22/2018 12:30 PM, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: > On 02/22/2018 10:42 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: >> On 02/22/2018 12:09 PM, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: > pkgdesc="An extensible & universal comment vim-plugin that also > handles embedded filetypes" Is this a wrapping issue or

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Ankit R Gadiya
On 02/22/2018 10:47 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 02/22/2018 12:12 PM, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: >> On 02/22/2018 08:16 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: >>> Naming scheme for vim plug-ins is always the other way around, >>> vim-something not something-vim. >>> Always prefix

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Ankit R Gadiya
On 02/22/2018 10:29 PM, Ivy Foster wrote: > On 22 Feb 2018, at 7:45 +0530, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I added two new PKGBUILD(s) today in the AUR, both are plugins for vim. >> Any advice, suggestions or feedback will be greatly appreciated. >> And if anybody would like the *-git

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Ankit R Gadiya
On 02/22/2018 10:49 PM, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:39:43 +0530 > Ankit R Gadiya wrote: install -Dm755 "${srcdir}/${pkgname/-/_}-${pkgver}/plugin/tcomment.vim" \ "${pkgdir}/usr/share/vim/vimfiles/plugin/tcomment.vim" insta

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Ankit R Gadiya
On 02/22/2018 10:42 PM, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > On 02/22/2018 12:09 PM, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: pkgdesc="An extensible & universal comment vim-plugin that also handles embedded filetypes" >>> >>> Is this a wrapping issue or is this really 2 lines? >> No, but is there a problem

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Doug Newgard via aur-general
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 22:39:43 +0530 Ankit R Gadiya wrote: > >> > >>install -Dm755 "${srcdir}/${pkgname/-/_}-${pkgver}/plugin/tcomment.vim" > >> \ > >>"${pkgdir}/usr/share/vim/vimfiles/plugin/tcomment.vim" > >>install -Dm755 "${srcdir}/${pkgname/-/_}-${pkgver}/doc/tcomment.txt"

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 02/22/2018 12:12 PM, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: > On 02/22/2018 08:16 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: >> Naming scheme for vim plug-ins is always the other way around, vim-something >> not something-vim. >> Always prefix them with vim. >> >> Cheers >> Levente >> > > I wasn't aware of t

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Ankit R Gadiya
On 02/22/2018 08:16 PM, Levente Polyak via aur-general wrote: > Naming scheme for vim plug-ins is always the other way around, vim-something > not something-vim. > Always prefix them with vim. > > Cheers > Levente > I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for letting me know. How can I fix it now? D

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 02/22/2018 12:09 PM, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: >>> pkgdesc="An extensible & universal comment vim-plugin that also >>> handles embedded filetypes" >> >> Is this a wrapping issue or is this really 2 lines? > No, but is there a problem with multiline description? Curious what you think the utility of

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Ankit R Gadiya
On 02/22/2018 08:13 PM, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 19:45:48 +0530 > Ankit R Gadiya wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I added two new PKGBUILD(s) today in the AUR, both are plugins for vim. >> Any advice, suggestions or feedback will be greatly appreciated. >> And if an

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Ivy Foster
On 22 Feb 2018, at 7:45 +0530, Ankit R Gadiya wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I added two new PKGBUILD(s) today in the AUR, both are plugins for vim. > Any advice, suggestions or feedback will be greatly appreciated. > And if anybody would like the *-git versions of these I will be more > then happy t

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Levente Polyak via aur-general
Naming scheme for vim plug-ins is always the other way around, vim-something not something-vim. Always prefix them with vim. Cheers Levente

Re: [aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Doug Newgard via aur-general
On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 19:45:48 +0530 Ankit R Gadiya wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I added two new PKGBUILD(s) today in the AUR, both are plugins for vim. > Any advice, suggestions or feedback will be greatly appreciated. > And if anybody would like the *-git versions of these I will be more > then hap

[aur-general] PKGBUILD(s) Review

2018-02-22 Thread Ankit R Gadiya
Hi everyone, I added two new PKGBUILD(s) today in the AUR, both are plugins for vim. Any advice, suggestions or feedback will be greatly appreciated. And if anybody would like the *-git versions of these I will be more then happy to add them as well. 1. ranger-vim: https://aur.archlinux.org/packa