Re: [aur-general] Package removal requests

2014-06-06 Thread Willem
Please cancel the removal of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp-5-gtk/ On 06/06/2014 05:16 PM, Willem wrote: Please remove: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp-5-gtk/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder2-hg/ They will now be integrated in split packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/pa

[aur-general] Package removal requests

2014-06-06 Thread Willem
Please remove: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp-5-gtk/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder2-hg/ They will now be integrated in split packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mp-5/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder-hg/ resp.

Re: [aur-general] Package removal requests: python2-shadowsocks

2013-11-20 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 17:30:40 Dazzy Ding wrote: > pkgname: python2-shadowsocks > pkgurl: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-shadowsocks/ > > This package is duplicated with `community/shadowsocks` > and need to be removed. > > Also, I recommand renaming repo package `community/

[aur-general] Package removal requests: python2-shadowsocks

2013-11-20 Thread Dazzy Ding
pkgname: python2-shadowsocks pkgurl: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-shadowsocks/ This package is duplicated with `community/shadowsocks` and need to be removed. Also, I recommand renaming repo package `community/shadowsocks` to `python2-shadowsocks`. That name caused I creating the du

Re: [aur-general] Package Removal Requests

2012-11-23 Thread Connor Behan
On 23/11/12 10:07 PM, Josh Klar wrote: > To whom it may concern, > > Please remove my packages, urbanterror42 and urbanterror42-data. They > were created during the time when the [community] version was > temporarily rolled back to 4.1.x. The maintainer of the [community] > packages has now brought

[aur-general] Package Removal Requests

2012-11-23 Thread Josh Klar
To whom it may concern, Please remove my packages, urbanterror42 and urbanterror42-data. They were created during the time when the [community] version was temporarily rolled back to 4.1.x. The maintainer of the [community] packages has now brought it back to 4.2.x and seems to be reasonably on th

Re: [aur-general] [Package Removal Requests]

2012-10-31 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Diogo Bento wrote: > > > > Greetings, > I'd like to ask for the removal of the following AUR packages: > slim-nock (as current slim from [extra] doesn't use consolekit): > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59448 Done. > udisks2-mount (as current udisks2 ve

[aur-general] [Package Removal Requests]

2012-10-31 Thread Diogo Bento
Greetings, I'd like to ask for the removal of the following AUR packages: slim-nock (as current slim from [extra] doesn't use consolekit): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59448 udisks2-mount (as current udisks2 version from [extra] is also up-to-date and similar to the one I've on AU

Re: [aur-general] Package removal requests (asdf-clisp, asdf-install-clis)p

2008-10-11 Thread Angel Velásquez
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 1:25 AM, joyfulgirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Would somebody mind removing asdf-clisp and asdf-install-clisp from > AUR? I'm their former maintainer, and a couple of months ago uploaded > packages more in line with other distros' Common Lisp package naming > conve

[aur-general] Package removal requests (asdf-clisp, asdf-install-clis)p

2008-10-11 Thread joyfulgirl
Hi, Would somebody mind removing asdf-clisp and asdf-install-clisp from AUR? I'm their former maintainer, and a couple of months ago uploaded packages more in line with other distros' Common Lisp package naming conventions. Currently (and for the past couple of months, as a transitional period), t