Re: [aur-general] Package merge request: vim-solarized-git and vim-colors-solarized-git

2013-10-21 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Jason St. John wrote: On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Felix Yan wrote: On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 20:28:36 Jason St. John wrote: On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John wrote: >> H

Re: [aur-general] Package merge request: vim-solarized-git and vim-colors-solarized-git

2013-10-18 Thread Jason St. John
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Felix Yan wrote: > On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 20:28:36 Jason St. John wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> I'm not sure which is a better package n

Re: [aur-general] Package merge request: vim-solarized-git and vim-colors-solarized-git

2013-10-16 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, October 16, 2013 20:28:36 Jason St. John wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no > >> dominating convention in

Re: [aur-general] Package merge request: vim-solarized-git and vim-colors-solarized-git

2013-10-16 Thread Jason St. John
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jason St. John wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no >> dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to >> the TUs. >> >> Please do o

Re: [aur-general] Package merge request: vim-solarized-git and vim-colors-solarized-git

2013-10-14 Thread Jason St. John
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Jason St. John wrote: > Hello, > > I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no > dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to > the TUs. > > Please do one of the following: > --- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-color

Re: [aur-general] Package merge request: oracle-instantclient-{sdk, basic} and instantclient-{sdk, basic}

2013-10-10 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Jason St. John wrote: Hello, Please merge instantclient-basic into oracle-instantclient-basic, and merge instantclient-sdk into oracle-instantclient-sdk. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/instantclient-basic/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/oracle-insta

[aur-general] Package merge request: oracle-instantclient-{sdk, basic} and instantclient-{sdk, basic}

2013-10-09 Thread Jason St. John
Hello, Please merge instantclient-basic into oracle-instantclient-basic, and merge instantclient-sdk into oracle-instantclient-sdk. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/instantclient-basic/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/oracle-instantclient-basic/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/instantcl

[aur-general] Package merge request: vim-solarized-git and vim-colors-solarized-git

2013-10-09 Thread Jason St. John
Hello, I'm not sure which is a better package name as there seems to be no dominating convention in the AUR, so I will leave that decision up to the TUs. Please do one of the following: --- merge vim-solarized-git into vim-colors-solarized-git --- have the package maintainer update vim-solarized-

Re: [aur-general] Package merge request

2013-03-09 Thread Felix Yan
On Saturday, March 09, 2013 15:40:16 Zom Aur wrote: > Hi, resending this since it seems to have been missed last time. > > Please merge votes and comments from > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bempc/ to > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bempc-git/ > > Apparently, the KDE-look package isn't

[aur-general] Package merge request

2013-03-09 Thread Zom Aur
Hi, resending this since it seems to have been missed last time. Please merge votes and comments from https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bempc/ to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bempc-git/ Apparently, the KDE-look package isn't actively updated any more, so the git version should be what we u

Re: [aur-general] package merge request

2013-03-06 Thread Yichao Yu
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Eiro Neemous wrote: > On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:58:49 Felix Yan wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 20:54:25 Eiro Neemous wrote: >>> >>> On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:48:58 Felix Yan wrote: >>> > On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:23:31 Eiro Neemous wrote

Re: [aur-general] package merge request

2013-03-06 Thread Eiro Neemous
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:58:49 Felix Yan wrote: On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 20:54:25 Eiro Neemous wrote: On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:48:58 Felix Yan wrote: > On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:23:31 Eiro Neemous wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm the maintainer of terminology-svn and terminology-g

Re: [aur-general] package merge request

2013-03-06 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 20:54:25 Eiro Neemous wrote: > On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:48:58 Felix Yan wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:23:31 Eiro Neemous wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm the maintainer of terminology-svn and terminology-git, please merge > >> the comments and votes of

Re: [aur-general] package merge request

2013-03-06 Thread Eiro Neemous
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 12:48:58 Felix Yan wrote: On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:23:31 Eiro Neemous wrote: Hi, I'm the maintainer of terminology-svn and terminology-git, please merge the comments and votes of terminology-svn into terminology-git, and leave terminology-svn as "out-of-dat

Re: [aur-general] package merge request

2013-03-06 Thread Felix Yan
On Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:23:31 Eiro Neemous wrote: > Hi, > > I'm the maintainer of terminology-svn and terminology-git, please merge > the comments and votes of terminology-svn into terminology-git, and leave > terminology-svn as "out-of-date" package (in other words, don't delete it > now)

[aur-general] package merge request

2013-03-06 Thread Eiro Neemous
Hi, I'm the maintainer of terminology-svn and terminology-git, please merge the comments and votes of terminology-svn into terminology-git, and leave terminology-svn as "out-of-date" package (in other words, don't delete it now), thanks in advance! :) Regards, Eiro Neemous

Re: [aur-general] package merge request

2012-11-17 Thread Jonathan Steel
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:15:39PM -0800, Chris Brannon wrote: > Hello, > I just uploaded python2-urllib3 [1]. > Could someone please merge python-urllib3 [2] into that package and delete > python-urllib3? There's also an existing python3-urllib3 package [3] which > should probably be renamed to p

[aur-general] package merge request

2012-11-16 Thread Chris Brannon
Hello, I just uploaded python2-urllib3 [1]. Could someone please merge python-urllib3 [2] into that package and delete python-urllib3? There's also an existing python3-urllib3 package [3] which should probably be renamed to python-urllib3. Thanks, -- Chris [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/

Re: [aur-general] Package merge request: mayavi-doc and python2-mayavi-doc

2012-08-27 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
On 27.08.2012 17:44, Felix Yan wrote: > This is following a rename by giniu ( aur/python2-mayavi => community/mayavi ) > > Please help me merge package python2-mayavi-doc [1] into mayavi-doc > [2] , thanks! > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46181 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pa

[aur-general] Package merge request: mayavi-doc and python2-mayavi-doc

2012-08-27 Thread Felix Yan
This is following a rename by giniu ( aur/python2-mayavi => community/mayavi ) Please help me merge package python2-mayavi-doc [1] into mayavi-doc [2] , thanks! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46181 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62326 Felix Yan Twitter: @felixonmars

Re: [aur-general] Package Merge Request: magicseteditor-xyz-mod ->magicseteditor

2011-12-20 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 8:17 AM, Sapphira Armageddos wrote: > URLs for the packages to be merged: > magicseteditor-xyz-mod (to be merged into the new package): > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53288 > magicseteditor (to be kept): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55117 Done, th

[aur-general] Package Merge Request: magicseteditor-xyz-mod ->magicseteditor

2011-12-19 Thread Sapphira Armageddos
URLs for the packages to be merged: magicseteditor-xyz-mod (to be merged into the new package): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53288 magicseteditor (to be kept): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55117 Reason: It was requested that I built a vanilla package for magicseteditor

Re: [aur-general] Package merge request: kernel26/linux-ice and kernel26/linux-rt-ice

2011-08-21 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >> Hi, please remove kernel26-ice [1] and merge comments/votes with linux-ice >> [2]. >> >> Also, I would prefer that kernel26-rt-ice [3] be removed and >> comments/votes merged with lin

Re: [aur-general] Package merge request: kernel26/linux-ice and kernel26/linux-rt-ice

2011-08-21 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > Hi, please remove kernel26-ice [1] and merge comments/votes with linux-ice > [2]. > > Also, I would prefer that kernel26-rt-ice [3] be removed and > comments/votes merged with linux-rt-ice [4]. Both done.

[aur-general] Package merge request: kernel26/linux-ice and kernel26/linux-rt-ice

2011-08-21 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
Hi, please remove kernel26-ice [1] and merge comments/votes with linux-ice [2]. Also, I would prefer that kernel26-rt-ice [3] be removed and comments/votes merged with linux-rt-ice [4]. The slight problem with that is that nvidia proprietary driver users will not be able to use linux-rt-ice, since