Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup (Discussion Period)

2010-11-10 Thread Loui Chang
On Mon 18 Oct 2010 17:38 +0200, Jakob Gruber wrote: > On 10/18/2010 04:10 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: > >Am 10.10.2010 13:46, schrieb Jakob Gruber: > >> On 10/04/2010 11:18 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote: > >>> In response to Louis objections about skipping the discussion period, > >>>I'm posting the ful

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup (Discussion Period)

2010-10-18 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 10/18/2010 04:10 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote: Am 10.10.2010 13:46, schrieb Jakob Gruber: On 10/04/2010 11:18 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote: In response to Louis objections about skipping the discussion period, I'm posting the full text of the proposal below. It has been altered from the original

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup (Discussion Period)

2010-10-18 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 10.10.2010 13:46, schrieb Jakob Gruber: > On 10/04/2010 11:18 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote: >> In response to Louis objections about skipping the discussion period, >> I'm posting the full text of the proposal below. It has been altered from >> the original text >> to incorporate Xynes idea of addi

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup (Discussion Period)

2010-10-10 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 10/04/2010 11:18 AM, Jakob Gruber wrote: In response to Louis objections about skipping the discussion period, I'm posting the full text of the proposal below. It has been altered from the original text to incorporate Xynes idea of adding the 'last maintainer activity rule. Sorry for maki

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup (Discussion Period)

2010-10-04 Thread Xyne
"package action" *snicker*

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup (Discussion Period)

2010-10-04 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 10/04/2010 03:07 PM, Peter Lewis wrote: Can I just clarify - "package action" only includes submission or resubmission / modification, right? I.e. adding comments, flagging out-of-date etc are not considered "package actions"? Thanks, Pete. That's correct, both package and maintainer acti

[aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup (Discussion Period)

2010-10-04 Thread Jakob Gruber
In response to Louis objections about skipping the discussion period, I'm posting the full text of the proposal below. It has been altered from the original text to incorporate Xynes idea of adding the 'last maintainer activity rule. Sorry for making you guys vote twice. This marks the beginn

Re: [aur-general] Proposal: Mass AUR Cleanup (Discussion Period)

2010-10-04 Thread Peter Lewis
On Monday 04 October 2010 at 10:18 Jakob Gruber wrote: > This marks the beginning of the discussion period. > Packages which are marked 'out of date' but the last package action > (submission or modification) > AND the maintainers last action (across all of his packages) are before > January 1st