Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-10-14 Thread Konstantin Gizdov
> Yes I did check the comments, which turned out to be a very old comment > about extra dependencies in rxvt-unicode-afterimage if enabled. Since > the mentioned package doesn't even exist today, I believe it's not an > issue anymore. That's good. I had to recompile `root` to properly link the

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-10-14 Thread Felix Yan via aur-general
On 10/1/18 2:51 AM, Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > I believe that is not true. I even enabled more functionality in >> libafterimage, actually. > > You mean when you removed `--disable-svg` flag? I might be wrong, but I > think there was a reason to leave it disabled. You'd have to check comments >

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-09-30 Thread Konstantin Gizdov
> > It was not denied to reopen. It was reopened as soon as you asked for > the first time. Yes, by you after I send this email, unless I am mistaken. The third bug was never reopened, by Filipe or anyone else, since it was > never closed to begin with. Sure, had it wrong in memory. Emails

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-09-30 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 9/30/18 2:51 PM, Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for the comments and explanations. > > Firstly, I wanna say that I am not asking for special treatment or > anything. Just wanted to discuss in detail what is going on. Secondly, a > few comments stood out to me (in no particular

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-09-30 Thread Doug Newgard via aur-general
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 13:59:28 -0500 Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:51:47 +0100 > Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > > > Denied resolution? > > > ... > > > I fail to see how you're being "denied" anything. > > > > Call it what you want, I tried to re-open all 3 bugs

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-09-30 Thread Doug Newgard via aur-general
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 19:51:47 +0100 Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > Denied resolution? > > ... > > I fail to see how you're being "denied" anything. > > Call it what you want, I tried to re-open all 3 bugs but was denied with > little to no comment/explanation. I wanted to know if python2 is going

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-09-30 Thread Konstantin Gizdov
Hi all, Thanks for the comments and explanations. Firstly, I wanna say that I am not asking for special treatment or anything. Just wanted to discuss in detail what is going on. Secondly, a few comments stood out to me (in no particular order). I actually want to move the whole "root" tree, but

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-09-29 Thread Felix Yan via aur-general
On 9/30/18 3:57 AM, Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > 3. The packages do not provide the same functionality as before, but > conflict with the AUR ones. I believe that is not true. I even enabled more functionality in libafterimage, actually. > 4. I wasn't told anything - my AUR package was deleted

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-09-29 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 9/29/18 11:13 PM, Mike Sampson wrote: > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 12:32 PM Eli Schwartz via aur-general > wrote: >> Apparently libafterimage was not well-maintained... > > I think I was the maintainer of libafterimage. I'm not using Arch > Linux at the moment so have been very slack with my AUR

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-09-29 Thread Mike Sampson
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 12:32 PM Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote: > Apparently libafterimage was not well-maintained... I think I was the maintainer of libafterimage. I'm not using Arch Linux at the moment so have been very slack with my AUR packages. I'll make an announcement somewhere in

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-09-29 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 9/29/18 3:57 PM, Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm writing to hopefully get some clarity on some packages that I > maintained in AUR (python-awkward-array, unuran), but have been overtaken > now in [community]. Also one other package that I have not maintained > 'libafterimage', but

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-09-29 Thread Filipe LaĆ­ns via aur-general
On Sat, 2018-09-29 at 20:57 +0100, Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm writing to hopefully get some clarity on some packages that I > maintained in AUR (python-awkward-array, unuran), but have been > overtaken > now in [community]. Also one other package that I have not maintained >

Re: [aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-09-29 Thread Daniel Capella via aur-general
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 7:57 PM Konstantin Gizdov wrote: > - How can I effectively communicate the nuts & bolts to the new > maintenaners so to say, to make sure users still get what's expected? > There's precedence for maintainers of specialized software in the AUR to be sponsored to become a

[aur-general] Questions about some of my packages being adopted in [community]

2018-09-29 Thread Konstantin Gizdov
Hi all, I'm writing to hopefully get some clarity on some packages that I maintained in AUR (python-awkward-array, unuran), but have been overtaken now in [community]. Also one other package that I have not maintained 'libafterimage', but dear to me. Firstly, thanks to Felix Yan for picking them