Re: [aur-general] Random (?) out-of-date marking

2012-09-30 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 09:56:20PM +0200, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote: > On 30 September 2012 21:11, Dave Reisner wrote: > > Well they're certainly doing something weird. I found an odd package of > > their own with a large amount of spam on it, and a rather spammy name, > > as well. > > Given that the

Re: [aur-general] Random (?) out-of-date marking

2012-09-30 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On 30 September 2012 21:11, Dave Reisner wrote: > Well they're certainly doing something weird. I found an odd package of > their own with a large amount of spam on it, and a rather spammy name, > as well. Given that the other package of this user seems to be perfectly OK, I have a feeling that i

Re: [aur-general] Random (?) out-of-date marking

2012-09-30 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 03:00:01PM -0400, Limao Luo wrote: > My package mcobj [1] has been repeatedly been marked out of date 580 > times in 10 minutes, with 61 out-of-date marks per minute (picture > for proof [2]). Checking through the email, I saw that the user that > was doing this was named in

[aur-general] Random (?) out-of-date marking

2012-09-30 Thread Limao Luo
My package mcobj [1] has been repeatedly been marked out of date 580 times in 10 minutes, with 61 out-of-date marks per minute (picture for proof [2]). Checking through the email, I saw that the user that was doing this was named invented [3]. I'm not really sure what's going on, particularly w