Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

* Ralf Mardorf (Sat, 20 Jun 2015 09:53:52 +0200): > +1 to remove those packages, without doubt at least one of them should > be removed and IMO in this case the mailing list is the right place > for this request. There is a separate mailing list for such discussions, which is automatically filled

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 08:11:26 +0200, Karol Blazewicz wrote: >https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdebase-konsole-xterm/ >https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/konsole2xterm/ > >Are we OK with such ... packages? +1 to remove those packages, without doubt at least one of them should be removed and IMO in

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

Am 20.06.2015 um 08:11 schrieb Karol Blazewicz: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdebase-konsole-xterm/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/konsole2xterm/ > > Are we OK with such ... packages? On AUR 3 which will be "overwritten" with AUR 4? Yes. The first one is also on AUR 4 and I added a

[aur-general] Removal requests

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdebase-konsole-xterm/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/konsole2xterm/ Are we OK with such ... packages?

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Requests] counterwalletd and counterwalletd-git

On 29/04/14 12:46 AM, Andy Weidenbaum wrote: > counterwalletd has been renamed to counterblockd upstream. Packages for > removal include: > > - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/counterwalletd/ > - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/counterwalletd-git/ Thanks, removed. signature.asc Descripti

[aur-general] [Removal Requests] counterwalletd and counterwalletd-git

counterwalletd has been renamed to counterblockd upstream. Packages for removal include: - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/counterwalletd/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/counterwalletd-git/

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Thursday, April 24, 2014 21:19:39 A Rojas wrote: > libnm-qt5-git > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libnm-qt5-git/ > > libmm-qt5-git > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libmm-qt5-git/ > > Git trunk is new Qt5-based for both repos, so they are replaced by libnm-qt- > git and libmm-qt-git >

[aur-general] Removal requests

libnm-qt5-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libnm-qt5-git/ libmm-qt5-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libmm-qt5-git/ Git trunk is new Qt5-based for both repos, so they are replaced by libnm-qt- git and libmm-qt-git kdeplasma-applets-networkmanagement-git https://aur.archlinux.org/pack

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Saturday, February 22, 2014 17:43:21 Evan Teitelman wrote: > Please remove the following packages: > > - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archtrack-exploitation-tools/ > - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archtrack-forensics/ > - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archtrack-hardware-hacking

[aur-general] Removal requests

Please remove the following packages: - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archtrack-exploitation-tools/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archtrack-forensics/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archtrack-hardware-hacking/ - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/archtrack-info-gathering/ - https

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 22:53:36 Jochen Schalanda wrote: > Hi, > > there are a few packages in AUR which I've submitted and which > can/should be removed for good. > > * dsc-cassandra-12 (superseded by "dsc-cassandra-1.2"), [1] > * ruby- (faulty PKGBUILD submitted by error), [2] > * ruby-p

[aur-general] Removal requests

Hi, there are a few packages in AUR which I've submitted and which can/should be removed for good. * dsc-cassandra-12 (superseded by "dsc-cassandra-1.2"), [1] * ruby- (faulty PKGBUILD submitted by error), [2] * ruby-puppet (merged with "puppet"), [3] * thrift-go (doesn't build properly) [4] * thr

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Benjamin A. Shelton wrote: > Howdy, > > It's time for my fall house-cleaning, and I would like to request the > removal of python2-sentry [1] and python2-httpbin-git [2]. As per the > Python package guidelines [3], these should never have been named with > the pyth

[aur-general] Removal requests

Howdy, It's time for my fall house-cleaning, and I would like to request the removal of python2-sentry [1] and python2-httpbin-git [2]. As per the Python package guidelines [3], these should never have been named with the python2- prefix as they are application packages (not libraries). I have ha

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests: dkms-rt8192cu

On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: > On 16.08.13 at 14:17, N30N wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This package has become dated and I would like it be removed: >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-rt8192cu/ >> >> Thanks and best regards, >> N30N. > > I can see that rtl8192cu is inclu

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests: dkms-rt8192cu

On 16.08.13 at 14:17, N30N wrote: > Hi, > > This package has become dated and I would like it be removed: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-rt8192cu/ > > Thanks and best regards, > N30N. I can see that rtl8192cu is included in current kernel, so I guess that https://aur.archlinux.org/pa

[aur-general] Removal requests: dkms-rt8192cu

Hi, This package has become dated and I would like it be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dkms-rt8192cu/ Thanks and best regards, N30N.

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests: lightzone-free

On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 20:58:11 N30N wrote: > This package[1] is no longer needed as the software has been > open-sourced and is available via the lightzone package[2]. > > So I'm requesting it's removal. > > Thanks, > N30N. > > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightzone-free/ >

[aur-general] Removal requests: lightzone-free

This package[1] is no longer needed as the software has been open-sourced and is available via the lightzone package[2]. So I'm requesting it's removal. Thanks, N30N. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightzone-free/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightzone/

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > Source gone: > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hyphen-nb/ > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hyphen-nn/ > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hunspell-nb/ > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hunspell-nn/ > * https://aur.archlinu

[aur-general] Removal requests

Source gone: * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hyphen-nb/ * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hyphen-nn/ * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hunspell-nb/ * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hunspell-nn/ * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kommute/ * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/klaptop

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > Source gone > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libping/ > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lovewallpaper/ > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-gd/ > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apache-jena/ > * https://aur.archlinux.o

[aur-general] Removal requests

Source gone * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libping/ * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lovewallpaper/ * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-gd/ * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/apache-jena/ * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aster-mpi/ * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/axkb/ * h

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: > Hi, > here's list of packages that can be removed: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python26-gnutls114/ - there is newer > version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python26-gnutls/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-x32/ -

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski > wrote: > > On 2013-07-02 01:39, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > >> Source gone > > > > >> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-activity-journal-bzr/ > > > > > > > All deleted, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > On 2013-07-02 01:39, Karol Blazewicz wrote: >> Source gone >> * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-activity-journal-bzr/ > > All deleted, thanks. > > -- > Bartłomiej Piotrowski > http://bpiotrowski.pl/ > Almost, https://a

[aur-general] Removal requests

Hi, here's list of packages that can be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python26-gnutls114/ - there is newer version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python26-gnutls/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-x32/ - replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/binx32-python2 htt

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On 2013-07-02 01:39, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > Source gone > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dcp130c/ > * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/abook-call/ - the diff is gone,, > the regular abook is in the repos > https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=abook > * https://aur.archlinux.org/pac

[aur-general] Removal requests

Source gone * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dcp130c/ * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/abook-call/ - the diff is gone,, the regular abook is in the repos https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?sort=&q=abook * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eclipse-i18n-packbidi/ * https://aur.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Maxime Gauduin wrote: > All gone, except imwheel, upstream is still there and package is not an > orphan. > > -- > Maxime imwheel wan not meant to be removed, I included the link for convenience. No Idea why there's a newline after the colon: >> https://aur.archli

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 02:36 +0200, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > Source gone > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/indicator-lookit/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imwheel-enchanced/ - the diff is > gone, w/o it it's a plain imwheel: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imwheel/ > https://aur.archl

[aur-general] Removal requests

Source gone https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/indicator-lookit/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imwheel-enchanced/ - the diff is gone, w/o it it's a plain imwheel: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/imwheel/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ispell-czech/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/isp

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 12:15 +0200, Jakub Klinkovský wrote: > Please delete these packages: > upstream gone: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rhythmbox-folderview-git/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wgetpkg-git/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ourico-hg/ > https://aur.archlinu

[aur-general] Removal requests

Please delete these packages: upstream gone: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rhythmbox-folderview-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wgetpkg-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ourico-hg/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/skvm-hg/ old versions of blender, I think both are usel

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On 06/21/2013 03:15 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > Source gone > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/craftbukkit-plugin-defaultpermissions/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/craftbukkit-plugin-griefalertr-permissions/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeicons-aqua_project/ > https://aur.archlin

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On 06/21/2013 04:58 AM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > Source gone > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-uvc-utils-svn/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lsit/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-batteries/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lopster-it/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages

[aur-general] Removal requests

Source gone https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/craftbukkit-plugin-defaultpermissions/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/craftbukkit-plugin-griefalertr-permissions/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeicons-aqua_project/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdeicons-ekisho_project/ https://aur.arch

[aur-general] Removal requests

Source gone https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-uvc-utils-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lsit/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-batteries/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lopster-it/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/logjam/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lualpm-git/ htt

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 15:49 +0200, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > Source gone > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i2400m-fw/ merge with > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i2400m-firmware/ ? > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i2400m-supplicant/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/icc/ > https://aur.

[aur-general] Removal requests

Source gone https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i2400m-fw/ merge with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i2400m-firmware/ ? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i2400m-supplicant/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/icc/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ifort/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/intel

Re: [aur-general] [removal requests] suckless packages which are deprecated due to their switch from hg to git

On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 20:51:50 +0100, Uli Armbruster wrote: > * Ike Devolder [04.03.2013 20:39]: > > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:00:20AM +0100, Uli Armbruster wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > The following packages don't build anymore because they are created for > > > hg, which doesn't exist anymore:

Re: [aur-general] [removal requests] suckless packages which are deprecated due to their switch from hg to git

* Ike Devolder [04.03.2013 20:39]: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:00:20AM +0100, Uli Armbruster wrote: > > Hi > > > > The following packages don't build anymore because they are created for hg, > > which doesn't exist anymore: > > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmenu-hg-config/ and > > h

Re: [aur-general] removal requests

Hi, All removed. Thanks for reporting. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU

[aur-general] removal requests

With the purpose of mingw-w64-* packages being dual 32/64-bit, I feel really uneasy about my lib32-mingw-w64-* packages. Looks like no one uses them anyway. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-mingw-w64-allegro4/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-mingw-w64-allegro4-static/ https://a

Re: [aur-general] [removal requests] suckless packages which are deprecated due to their switch from hg to git

urm... wait. did that even make sense? so, there are the typical 10 kind of people. those following upstream and not (or at the brink) using the aur who know it's been git for a while. and then, those who first found the stuff in aur and not looking upstream if their packages were okay and then ask

Re: [aur-general] [removal requests] suckless packages which are deprecated due to their switch from hg to git

the outdated packaging already posed as misleading for some users, as the switch to git has been well advertised by upstream. it came up that people believed to be fully up to date when asking upstream, altough svn had long run dry. otoh, I could have said something myself earlier to keep things cl

Re: [aur-general] [removal requests] suckless packages which are deprecated due to their switch from hg to git

* Ike Devolder [04.03.2013 20:39]: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:00:20AM +0100, Uli Armbruster wrote: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmenu-hg-config/ and > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmenu-hg-xdg/, please delete, it makes > > more sense to ask for inclusion of those patches in

Re: [aur-general] [removal requests] suckless packages which are deprecated due to their switch from hg to git

On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:00:20AM +0100, Uli Armbruster wrote: > Hi > > The following packages don't build anymore because they are created for hg, > which doesn't exist anymore: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmenu-hg-config/ and > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmenu-hg-xdg/, ple

[aur-general] [removal requests] suckless packages which are deprecated due to their switch from hg to git

Hi The following packages don't build anymore because they are created for hg, which doesn't exist anymore: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmenu-hg-config/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dmenu-hg-xdg/, please delete, it makes more sense to ask for inclusion of those patches in htt

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On 8 February 2013 07:07, OmeGa wrote: > Hi, > > Could you please remove the following orphans, please: > > pypy-bin [1]: Pypy is Community. > cinnamon-theme-zukitwo [2]: The source is gone. > cinnamon-theme-jelly-bean [3]: It's a duplicate of cinnamon-theme-holo. > zukitwo-theme [4]: It's a dupli

[aur-general] Removal requests

Hi, Could you please remove the following orphans, please: pypy-bin [1]: Pypy is Community. cinnamon-theme-zukitwo [2]: The source is gone. cinnamon-theme-jelly-bean [3]: It's a duplicate of cinnamon-theme-holo. zukitwo-theme [4]: It's a duplicate of zukitwo-themes. fontmanager [5]: It's a duplic

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On 26/12/12 08:11 PM, Schala Zeal wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fpc32-allegro_pas/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fpc-x86_64-win64-allegro_pas/ > > > Gave th

[aur-general] Removal requests

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fpc32-allegro_pas/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fpc-x86_64-win64-allegro_pas/ Gave these packages a slightly more appropriate renami

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Sunday, December 23, 2012 02:23:21 AM Schala Zeal wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/allegro_pas/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fpc-i386-win32-allegro_pas/ > > I slightly altered the package name in both, and it should be safe to > remove considering as no votes or comments resi

[aur-general] Removal requests

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/allegro_pas/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fpc-i386-win32-allegro_pas/ I slightly altered the package name in both, and it should be safe to remove considering as no votes or comments reside in these.

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On 22/10/12 08:22 PM, Schala Zeal wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59982 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59981 > > These are essentially Python modules, which is why I resubmitted them > with a conventional python2-* prefix Thanks... deleted! signature.asc Descripti

[aur-general] Removal requests

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59982 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59981 These are essentially Python modules, which is why I resubmitted them with a conventional python2-* prefix

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On 21/10/12 11:37 PM, Schala Zeal wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63728 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63396 > > In order to allow users to have more customization to the addons, I've > adjusted these packages in such a way that their package names seem > unsuitable

[aur-general] Removal requests

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63728 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63396 In order to allow users to have more customization to the addons, I've adjusted these packages in such a way that their package names seem unsuitable and have reuploaded them with new names.

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On 14/10/12 11:16 PM, Schala Zeal wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62098 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62099 > > mingw-w64-bullet apparently already exists, submitted by another user. > Whoops. Deleted them, thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital sign

[aur-general] Removal requests

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62098 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=62099 mingw-w64-bullet apparently already exists, submitted by another user. Whoops.

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On 08/26/2012 09:41 PM, Connor Behan wrote: > On 26/08/12 09:39 PM, Schala Zeal wrote: >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58510 >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58486 >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61472 >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61473 >> https

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On 26/08/12 09:39 PM, Schala Zeal wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58510 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58486 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61472 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61473 > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58485 > > All

[aur-general] Removal requests

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58510 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58486 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61472 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=61473 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58485 All of these are Flash games I previously packaged that ar

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests on teamview-beta

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Zhengyu Xu wrote: > Dear who may concern, > > Please help me to remove a package from AUR, thank you > very much. The detailed information about the pkg is as > follow: > > PKG name: teamviewer-beta > PKG URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55243 > Submi

[aur-general] Removal requests on teamview-beta

Dear who may concern, Please help me to remove a package from AUR, thank you very much. The detailed information about the pkg is as follow: PKG name: teamviewer-beta PKG URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55243 Submitter & Maintainer: xzy3186 (it is me) Reason for deleting: There are

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Bernard Baeyens wrote: > nvidia-utils-patched > opencl-nvidia-patched > nvidia-patched > > These packages were crea

[aur-general] Removal requests

nvidia-utils-patched opencl-nvidia-patched nvidia-patched These packages were created only waiting for the nvidia driver release 295.49 which is now

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests: mingw32-openssl-devel and mingw32-libtiff-devel

Oh right. I forgot about that. On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Schala Zeal > wrote: >> I would like to request mingw32-libtiff-devel and >> mingw32-openssl-devel be removed. Development versions of libtiff and >> openssl aren't in

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests: mingw32-openssl-devel and mingw32-libtiff-devel

On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Schala Zeal wrote: > I would like to request mingw32-libtiff-devel and > mingw32-openssl-devel be removed. Development versions of libtiff and > openssl aren't in demand at all for production environments and as > such, I would rather focus maintaining stable releas

[aur-general] Removal requests: mingw32-openssl-devel and mingw32-libtiff-devel

I would like to request mingw32-libtiff-devel and mingw32-openssl-devel be removed. Development versions of libtiff and openssl aren't in demand at all for production environments and as such, I would rather focus maintaining stable releases. Thank you.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Requests

On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Valere Monseur wrote: > Hi, > > Can you remove these 2 packages? > > > package: cobxref > url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39026 > reason: renamed to cobxref-svn (I wrongly named it at package creation). > > package: ktsuss > url: https://aur.archlinu

[aur-general] Removal Requests

Hi, Can you remove these 2 packages? package: cobxref url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39026 reason: renamed to cobxref-svn (I wrongly named it at package creation). package: ktsuss url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13112 reason: upstream dev has moved to svn so I've

Re: [aur-general] Removal Requests

On 11/02/2011 10:43 AM, Luca Bennati wrote: > python-decoroute-hg (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31564): > wrong name (python2 only), right package is python2-decoroute-hg, available > at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41956 > python-munkres (https://aur.archlinux.org/package

[aur-general] Removal Requests

python-decoroute-hg (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31564): wrong name (python2 only), right package is python2-decoroute-hg, available at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41956 python-munkres (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39576): wrong name (python2 only), right pa

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

Ok, thank you. - Alexander Den 15. sep. 2011 16:40 skrev "Lukáš Jirkovský" følgende: > On 13 September 2011 17:27, Alexander Rødseth wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I got no confirmation for the other packages, could these be deleted? >> >> A project with a different name has taken over for aldrin, so I can

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On 13 September 2011 17:27, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Hi, > > I got no confirmation for the other packages, could these be deleted? > > A project with a different name has taken over for aldrin, so I can't > imagine that these packages will be needed by anyone: >  aldrin: https://aur.archlinux.or

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

Hi, I got no confirmation for the other packages, could these be deleted? A project with a different name has taken over for aldrin, so I can't imagine that these packages will be needed by anyone: aldrin: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16330 aldrin-hg: https://aur.archlinux.org/pa

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

It seg faults if you don't provide an argument, it works fine if you do. ie: # motor /dev/tty7 Btw, I don't have any interest in this package, I just yanked it out of cower and built it to prove a point:) One man's unmaintained does not mean its worthless to another. On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 7:

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

Btw, "motor" (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=385) does not work. It segfaults when run. -- Sincerely,    Alexander Rødseth    (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

Hi Sébastien, 2011/9/10 Seblu > "no longer maintained" is not a good reason to remove it. Lot of > software are not maintained and they are still useful. > As long as they are not broken. It can be hard to judge when an application is broken or not, though, as that can depend on the version of t

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > cheesetracker (no longer maintained): >   https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2743 > > motor (no longer maintained): >   https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=385 > > tiled (the java version of tiled, no longer maintained): >  

[aur-general] Removal requests

Hi, Please remove the following AUR packages: aldrin and aldrin-hg (not maintained, dead homepage) aldrin: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16330 aldrin-hg: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23192 ccons (does not compile, actively developed, but no new release for 2 ye

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests

On 8 September 2011 04:57, Cyker Way wrote: > Please remove packages mpy and mpy-git. Due to name conflict on PyPI, they > have been renamed as ncmpy and ncmpy-git. Thanks! > > -- > > > > Cyker Way > E-mail: cyker...@gmail.com > http://www.cykerway.com > Done. Please include links in your future

[aur-general] Removal requests

Please remove packages mpy and mpy-git. Due to name conflict on PyPI, they have been renamed as ncmpy and ncmpy-git. Thanks! -- Cyker Way E-mail: cyker...@gmail.com http://www.cykerway.com

Re: [aur-general] Removal Requests

On 09/07/2011 05:19 PM, Luca Bennati wrote: Each one for non existant upstream logitech_applet https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2074 archfoster https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1935 mpcstick https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12754 removed -- Jelle van der Waa

[aur-general] Removal Requests

Each one for non existant upstream logitech_applet https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2074 archfoster https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1935 mpcstick https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12754

Re: [aur-general] Removal requests: AUFS packages cleanup

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:00:07PM +0200, Calimero wrote: > Hello, > As of the release of AUFS3, these packages need to be removed (they > are orphaned, or mine): > > aufs2 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49766 > aufs2-all https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38249 > aufs2-ck htt

[aur-general] Removal requests: AUFS packages cleanup

Hello, As of the release of AUFS3, these packages need to be removed (they are orphaned, or mine): aufs2 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49766 aufs2-all https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38249 aufs2-ck https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37345 aufs2-util https://aur.

[aur-general] Removal Requests

netmaze (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1842) - Very old (1996) unfinished multiplayer game. 2 votes, no maintainer, PKGBUILD not updated since 2005. fxsudoku (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=Merge/4053) - Dead project, dead sour

Re: [aur-general] Removal Requests

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Luca Bennati wrote: > kradio4-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23872 upstream > switched to git > kradioripper https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19984 upstream > renamed to kstreamripper (already in AUR, maintained by me) > kradioripper-kde4 h

[aur-general] Removal Requests

kradio4-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23872 upstream switched to git kradioripper https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19984 upstream renamed to kstreamripper (already in AUR, maintained by me) kradioripper-kde4 https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=20433 same

Re: [aur-general] Removal Requests

On Sat, 13 Aug 2011, gadget3000 wrote: > falldown (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11856) is a dead project > and has a dead source link. I can't find a mirror. > poker3d (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9894) is a dead > multiplayer only project. Dead source link, I found a mirro

[aur-general] Removal Requests

falldown (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11856) is a dead project and has a dead source link. I can't find a mirror. poker3d (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9894) is a dead multiplayer only project. Dead source link, I found a mirror here ( http://download.gna.org/underware/poke

Re: [aur-general] Removal Requests

On 08/10/2011 04:40 PM, Luca Bennati wrote: amarok-ase-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47018 : branch merged in master anjal-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30220 : inexistent git repo babl-nightly https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41440 : dead upstream link, s

[aur-general] Removal Requests

amarok-ase-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47018 : branch merged in master anjal-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30220 : inexistent git repo babl-nightly https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41440 : dead upstream link, superseded by babl-git blender-apricot https://