Ahh okay, thanks for clarifying that for me
On 10/05/2014, Felix Yan wrote:
> On Saturday, May 10, 2014 10:58:31 David Phillips wrote:
>> On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages
>> aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are
>> no longer the
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 10:58:31 David Phillips wrote:
> On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages
> aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are
> no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are
> still using them instea
On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages
aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are
no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are
still using them instead of systemd?
On 09/05/2014, Felix Yan wrote:
> On Thursday, Ma
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 15:46:28 Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just stumbled upon this[1] package, it is very old (last updated in
> 2009) and useful only when Arch used to have RC init scripts.
>
> I'd suggest its removal.
> [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arc-status/
Remo
Hi,
Just stumbled upon this[1] package, it is very old (last updated in
2009) and useful only when Arch used to have RC init scripts.
I'd suggest its removal.
Also, I think there are still a number of packages related to old
initscripts. Do you mind if every time we find one, we request its
rem
