Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-02-05 Thread Dave Reisner
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:57:32PM +0100, carstene1ns wrote: > Am 31.01.2014 14:42, schrieb Dave Reisner: > > On Jan 31, 2014 7:17 AM, "Lukas Fleischer" wrote: > [...] > >> Side effects: > >> > >> * The ~2000 packages maintained by these users will be orphaned. > > > > Can we get a list of these

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-02-05 Thread carstene1ns
Am 31.01.2014 14:42, schrieb Dave Reisner: > On Jan 31, 2014 7:17 AM, "Lukas Fleischer" wrote: [...] >> Side effects: >> >> * The ~2000 packages maintained by these users will be orphaned. > > Can we get a list of these packages?[...] As nobody with the power to do sql-fu on the AUR server creat

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-02-05 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 at 13:17:25, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to remove all AUR accounts that have not been used for at least > 500 days (according to the last login time stamp). This affects ~35000 > users, see [1] for a complete list. If your account is on that list and > you think it

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-02-04 Thread Joakim Hernberg
On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 19:02:14 +0100 Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 at 13:17:25, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > I plan to remove all AUR accounts that have not been used for at > > least 500 days (according to the last login time stamp). This > > affects ~35000 users, see [1] for a compl

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-02-04 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 at 13:17:25, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to remove all AUR accounts that have not been used for at least > 500 days (according to the last login time stamp). This affects ~35000 > users, see [1] for a complete list. If your account is on that list and > you think it

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-02-01 Thread Jason St. John
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Никола Вукосављевић wrote: > On 31.1.2014 15:34, Nowaker wrote: >>> Can you find an example of a 2 year old comment which is still >>> relevant? >> >> Maybe all comments older than 2 years should be removed? 2 years >> old comments are irrelevant regardless of user

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-02-01 Thread Никола Вукосављевић
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 31.1.2014 15:34, Nowaker wrote: >> Can you find an example of a 2 year old comment which is still >> relevant? > > Maybe all comments older than 2 years should be removed? 2 years > old comments are irrelevant regardless of user being currently > a

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-02-01 Thread Xyne
Nowaker wrote: >Maybe all comments older than 2 years should be removed? 2 years old >comments are irrelevant regardless of user being currently active or not. I agree that if you are going to remove old comments then you should remove all old comments. I also think that you should remove the v

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-01-31 Thread Joakim Hernberg
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:25:04 -0500 Dave Reisner wrote: > Can you find an example of a 2 year old comment which is still > relevant? I'm not even going to try, was just an observation... -- Joakim

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-01-31 Thread Nowaker
Can you find an example of a 2 year old comment which is still relevant? Maybe all comments older than 2 years should be removed? 2 years old comments are irrelevant regardless of user being currently active or not. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-01-31 Thread Dave Reisner
On Jan 31, 2014 9:18 AM, "Joakim Hernberg" wrote: > > On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:17:25 +0100 > Lukas Fleischer wrote: > > > * All ~2 comments written by any of the users will be removed. > > Removing comments might lead to disconnected discussions in the > comments... Can you find an example of

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-01-31 Thread Joakim Hernberg
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:17:25 +0100 Lukas Fleischer wrote: > * All ~2 comments written by any of the users will be removed. Removing comments might lead to disconnected discussions in the comments... -- Joakim

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-01-31 Thread Dave Reisner
On Jan 31, 2014 7:17 AM, "Lukas Fleischer" wrote: > > Hi, > > I plan to remove all AUR accounts that have not been used for at least > 500 days (according to the last login time stamp). This affects ~35000 > users, see [1] for a complete list. If your account is on that list and > you think it sho

Re: [aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-01-31 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 at 13:17:25, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to remove all AUR accounts that have not been used for at least > 500 days (according to the last login time stamp). This affects ~35000 > users, see [1] for a complete list. If your account is on that list and > you think it

[aur-general] Removing stale accounts from the AUR

2014-01-31 Thread Lukas Fleischer
Hi, I plan to remove all AUR accounts that have not been used for at least 500 days (according to the last login time stamp). This affects ~35000 users, see [1] for a complete list. If your account is on that list and you think it shouldn't be there, please let me know. Side effects: * The ~2000