On 01/29/2013 07:42 PM, Uwe Koloska wrote:
On 29.01.2013 01:24, Limao Luo wrote:
You can smoosh that package function into:
https://gist.github.com/4660513
(Just remember to quote anything involving $srcdir, for the same reason
you quoted $pkgdir)
Thank you -- together with the --mandir trick
On 01/29/2013 07:41 PM, Uwe Koloska wrote:
On 29.01.2013 01:50, Daniel Wallace wrote:
try http://ix.io/4bk
and configure the --mandir so you can just get dir of the mkdir and
mv commands all together.
The tip from the Arch wiki:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines is sl
On 01/29/2013 08:00 PM, Uwe Koloska wrote:
Is
there a proposed way to give credit to the former maintainer? Or will
he only survive in the history (if there is anything like this)?
But this question is still of interest ;-)
Have a look at the top of one of my packages:
https://aur.archlinux.or
On 30.01.2013 01:41, Uwe Koloska wrote:
> Because you changed the Maintainer back to the (now) former one:
Forget about this sentence, it doesn't make sense ...
... I have diffed a newer version of my PKGBUILD.
> Is
> there a proposed way to give credit to the former maintainer? Or will
> he onl
On 29.01.2013 01:24, Limao Luo wrote:
> You can smoosh that package function into:
> https://gist.github.com/4660513
>
> (Just remember to quote anything involving $srcdir, for the same reason
> you quoted $pkgdir)
Thank you -- together with the --mandir trick from Daniel this will make
the scrip
On 29.01.2013 01:50, Daniel Wallace wrote:
> try http://ix.io/4bk
> and configure the --mandir so you can just get dir of the mkdir and
> mv commands all together.
Thank you -- that looks great and is very welcome!
Because you changed the Maintainer back to the (now) former one: Is
there a propos
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:58:42AM +0100, Uwe Koloska wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since I'm really new to archlinux and the AUR I would like to get some
> comments on my first package, derived from an existing one:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tdom/
> Since the update to tcl 8.6 it is not possib
On 01/28/2013 07:24 PM, Limao Luo wrote:
On 01/28/2013 06:58 PM, Uwe Koloska wrote:
What's best: make a new package tdom-git that uses the github master
branch or just change the current package?
Or make a "stable" package that uses the last tagged version and patch
the support for tcl 8.6? (a
On 01/28/2013 06:58 PM, Uwe Koloska wrote:
Hello,
since I'm really new to archlinux and the AUR
Welcome to Arch!
I would like to get some
comments on my first package, derived from an existing one:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tdom/
Since the update to tcl 8.6 it is not possible to
Hello,
since I'm really new to archlinux and the AUR I would like to get some
comments on my first package, derived from an existing one:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tdom/
Since the update to tcl 8.6 it is not possible to build the package.
Their is no current tagged version so I have cr
10 matches
Mail list logo