On 24 August 2013 02:41, Marshall Conover wrote:
> I have uploaded a new package, drawterm-hg[2], which (as far as I can tell)
> meets the criteria for a package on the AUR, and fixes the issues with the
> old drawterm package (which also used mercurial, but didn't have it in the
> name). As the n
Hello aur-general,
I messaged the list about two weeks about the drawterm[1] package,
saying that I had flagged the package out of date, uploaded a working
package build to the page as a comment, and attempted to contact the owner
of the package two weeks prior; I then asked that the package be
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 19:44:27 -0400
Marshall Conover wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>the drawterm package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/drawterm/) is
> currently out-of date, and its name does not reflect the fact that it pulls
> from a mercurial repository. I emailed the owner a little more tha
On Aug 12, 2013 4:44 PM, "Marshall Conover" wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
>the drawterm package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/drawterm/) is
> currently out-of date, and its name does not reflect the fact that it
pulls
> from a mercurial repository. I emailed the owner a little more than two
>
Hello all,
the drawterm package (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/drawterm/) is
currently out-of date, and its name does not reflect the fact that it pulls
from a mercurial repository. I emailed the owner a little more than two
weeks ago, and they have not responded.
I have commented on the
