On 2013-05-22 20:51, Jameson wrote:
> Yep. The maintainer has an @aur.archlinux.org address listed which is
> obviously bogus. Can we, please, go ahead with this request?
Of course we can! Orphaned, thanks.
--
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
http://bpiotrowski.pl/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP d
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Joseph Yaworski wrote:
> No response, and the email appears to have bounced at the address.
Yep. The maintainer has an @aur.archlinux.org address listed which is
obviously bogus. Can we, please, go ahead with this request?
Thanks,
=-Jameson
No response, and the email appears to have bounced at the address.
On Fri, 03 May 2013 09:07:55 -0400
Jy Yaworski wrote:
> I have now emailed the maintainer directly, and will update this
> thread if they do not respond in two weeks' time.
>
> On 2013-05-03 07:32, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
> > On
I have now emailed the maintainer directly, and will update this thread
if they do not respond in two weeks' time.
On 2013-05-03 07:32, Lukas Jirkovsky wrote:
On 1 May 2013 14:53, Jy Yaworski wrote:
Hello:
simon [1] has been at version 0.4 for some time, and has been flagged
as
such since 2
On 1 May 2013 14:53, Jy Yaworski wrote:
> Hello:
>
> simon [1] has been at version 0.4 for some time, and has been flagged as
> such since 2012-12-30. The maintainer doesn't seem to be responsive to
> comments, and an orphan request has been in the comments since 2013-03-01.
> Could this be orphan
Hello:
simon [1] has been at version 0.4 for some time, and has been flagged
as such since 2012-12-30. The maintainer doesn't seem to be responsive
to comments, and an orphan request has been in the comments since
2013-03-01. Could this be orphaned so that another maintainer could pick
it up?
