Hi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:47 PM, William Giokas 1007...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:49:11PM -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote:
As someone who maintains a lot of git packages, I wish, I really wish
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Anatol Pomozov
anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:47 PM, William Giokas 1007...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:49:11PM -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com
Hi
The sha1 is useful to people who need to quickly tell developers which
version they are running when they're from git. Removing it is a bad
idea.
You can get the commit from the version number even without the SHA1,
something like:
git log --oneline $VERSION..$BRANCH | tail -n $REVISION |
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Anatol Pomozov
anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
The sha1 is useful to people who need to quickly tell developers which
version they are running when they're from git. Removing it is a bad
idea.
You can get the commit from the version number even without
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:26:27AM -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi
The sha1 is useful to people who need to quickly tell developers which
version they are running when they're from git. Removing it is a bad
idea.
You can get the commit from the version number even without the SHA1,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:26 PM, Anatol Pomozov
anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
The sha1 is useful to people who need to quickly tell developers which
version they are running when they're from git. Removing it is a bad
idea.
You can get the commit from the version number even without
Hello,
Am 31.10.2013 16:09, schrieb Jerome Leclanche:
The main issue with -git versioning is the inconsistency.
I don't think so. I think the main issue with git versioning (regarding
package versions) is its non monotonic trait.
I'm not suggesting we drop the pkgver function (nobody is).
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:17:41PM +0100, Uwe Koloska wrote:
Hello,
Am 31.10.2013 16:09, schrieb Jerome Leclanche:
The main issue with -git versioning is the inconsistency.
I don't think so. I think the main issue with git versioning (regarding
package versions) is its non monotonic
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:35:24 -0500
From: 1007...@gmail.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Revise VCS packages versioning
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:17:41PM +0100, Uwe Koloska wrote:
Hello,
Am 31.10.2013 16:09, schrieb
Hi
I would like to discuss VCS package versioning that is described here
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines
I am looking at the -git packages but it also applicable to other VCS.
Here is the suggested way to create the version
local ver=$(git describe --tags)
echo
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Anatol Pomozov
anatol.pomo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I would like to discuss VCS package versioning that is described here
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines
I am looking at the -git packages but it also applicable to other VCS.
Here
Hi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote:
As someone who maintains a lot of git packages, I wish, I really wish
there was a *standardized* way of writing a pkgver that would output
the appropriate format whether there are tags pushed upstream or not.
That
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:49:11 -0700
From: anatol.pomo...@gmail.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Revise VCS packages versioning
Hi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote:
As someone
Hi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 21:49:11 -0700
From: anatol.pomo...@gmail.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Revise VCS packages versioning
Hi
On Wed
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:09:21 -0700
From: anatol.pomo...@gmail.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Revise VCS packages versioning
Hi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com wrote
Anatol, Doug,
I do not propose to remove pkgver(). What I say is that vcs version
generator becomes non-trivial and many people use different and
inconsistent VCS versions. It indicates that there should be some
standard way to generate version. If you don't want to use the
standard
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 01:32:03 -0400
From: i...@kernel.org
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Revise VCS packages versioning
Anatol, Doug,
I do not propose to remove pkgver(). What I say is that vcs version
generator becomes
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 09:49:11PM -0700, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote:
As someone who maintains a lot of git packages, I wish, I really wish
there was a *standardized* way of writing a pkgver that would output
the
Hi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com wrote:
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:09:21 -0700
From: anatol.pomo...@gmail.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Revise VCS packages versioning
Hi
On Wed
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:50:55 -0700
From: anatol.pomo...@gmail.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Revise VCS packages versioning
Hi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Doug Newgard scimmi...@outlook.com wrote
From: scimmi...@outlook.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 00:55:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [aur-general] Revise VCS packages versioning
Mine are inconsistent because some need it and some don't. I don't use the
r if it can't become
21 matches
Mail list logo
