Lukas Fleischer via aur-general wrote:
>I find it ridiculous to call Trusted Users active ("in some sense") if
>all they do is vote. The actual job of a Trusted User is to maintain the
>AUR and the [community] repository. Imagine a world where all Trusted
>Users would do nothing but add/remove new
On Sun, 21 Jan 2018 at 04:07:06, Xyne wrote:
> Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
>
> >Yes, it is a bit ambiguous. The discussion in #archlinux-tu concluded that
> >the
> >voting being an the AUR was just happenstance and intent of the section was
> >that voting not be included in point 2. With
Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote:
>Yes, it is a bit ambiguous. The discussion in #archlinux-tu concluded that the
>voting being an the AUR was just happenstance and intent of the section was
>that voting not be included in point 2. With many/most of the most active TUs
>participating or present
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 22:05:10 +0100
Thorsten Toepper wrote:
> Whether the votes happens in the AUR web interface or on a separate
> private mailing list is unimportant for the real process I agree, just
> at the moment it's the AUR webinterface and the second point is simply
> not too well formula
On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 at 22:05:10, Thorsten Toepper wrote:
> [...]
> Whether the votes happens in the AUR web interface or on a separate
> private mailing list is unimportant for the real process I agree, just
> at the moment it's the AUR webinterface and the second point is simply
> not too well for
On 18.01.2018 22:11, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 01/18/2018 04:05 PM, Thorsten Toepper wrote:
>> First of all: Congratulations for becoming a TU, you should have applied
>> sooner so I could've given you my "yes". :-)
>
> Thanks! :)
>
>> Rephrasing the bylaw to something like
>>
>> "
On 01/18/2018 04:05 PM, Thorsten Toepper wrote:
> First of all: Congratulations for becoming a TU, you should have applied
> sooner so I could've given you my "yes". :-)
Thanks! :)
> Rephrasing the bylaw to something like
>
> "performed any action that required TU privileges on the AUR
> (*exclu
On 18.01.2018 02:11, Eli Schwartz via aur-general wrote:
> On 01/17/2018 06:18 PM, Thorsten Toepper wrote:
>> I'm no longer a TU so I can't see how active both speps and faidoc have
>> been regarding participation in the votes. Yet the TU-Bylaws are pretty
>> strict and given that Bluewind/Florian
On 18.01.2018 01:43, Balló György via aur-general wrote:
> On 18.01.2018 00.18, Thorsten Toepper via aur-general wrote:
>> Therefore the second requirement, to NOT do any special action on the
>> AUR requiring TU privileges is not fulfilled, as participating in
>> votes is exactly one of these TU p
On 01/17/2018 06:18 PM, Thorsten Toepper wrote:
> I'm no longer a TU so I can't see how active both speps and faidoc have
> been regarding participation in the votes. Yet the TU-Bylaws are pretty
> strict and given that Bluewind/Florian pointed out during the discussion
> period that both TUs had p
On 18.01.2018 00.18, Thorsten Toepper via aur-general wrote:
> Therefore the second requirement, to NOT do any special action on the
> AUR requiring TU privileges is not fulfilled, as participating in
> votes is exactly one of these TU privileges.
This is unclear in the bylaws. I assumed that AUR
On 17.01.2018 19:51, Balló György via aur-general wrote:
> The voting is over. Results:
>
> Yes: 33
> No: 5
> Abstain: 5
>
> This means that speps is no longer a Trusted User.
>
> --
> György Balló
> Trusted User
>
I'm no longer a TU so I can't see how active both speps and faidoc have
been r
The voting is over. Results:
Yes: 33
No: 5
Abstain: 5
This means that speps is no longer a Trusted User.
--
György Balló
Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Em janeiro 12, 2018 17:14 NicoHood escreveu:
Just to be sure:
YES = Delete
NO = Keep
Correct?
We had this discussion and more on the IRC channel. But you're
correct on your assumption, YES mean TU removal. No, to keep
them.
Regards,
Giancarlo Razzolini
pgpwr6O5WbOqt.pgp
Description: PGP si
On 01/12/2018 06:50 PM, Balló György via aur-general wrote:
> The discussion period is over, let's start the vote:
> https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=100
>
> --
> György Balló
> Trusted User
>
Just to be sure:
YES = Delete
NO = Keep
Correct?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signatu
The discussion period is over, let's start the vote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=100
--
György Balló
Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On 09.01.2018 14:06, Balló György via aur-general wrote:
> 1. His last commit in the [community] repository: 2017-01-03
> 2. He doesn't maintain any packages in AUR.
> 3. His last message to aur-general mailing list: 2014-03-02
> 4. Most of his packages were adopted by dvzrv.
The last time he voted
According to the Trusted User Bylaws[1], we have to vote about the
removal of an inactive TU, speps. So I'm starting a discussion period
of 3 days.
1. His last commit in the [community] repository: 2017-01-03
2. He doesn't maintain any packages in AUR.
3. His last message to aur-general mailing li
18 matches
Mail list logo
