Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-24 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2016-03-23 22:59, G. Schlisio wrote: >> Well, the 5 day period has ended to interview the applicant, so now the 7 >> day period to vote is opened. >> >> Good luck! >> >> Cheers > > out of curiosity: is the voting over yet? > Apparently Alexandre forgot to post the results here… To expand lako

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-23 Thread G. Schlisio
Am 23.03.2016 um 23:27 schrieb Sébastien Luttringer: > On mer., 2016-03-23 at 22:59 +0100, G. Schlisio wrote: >>> >>> Well, the 5 day period has ended to interview the applicant, so now the 7 >>> day period to vote is opened. >>> >>> Good luck! >>> >>> Cheers >> out of curiosity: is the voting over

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-23 Thread WebDawg
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: > On mer., 2016-03-23 at 22:59 +0100, G. Schlisio wrote: >> > >> > Well, the 5 day period has ended to interview the applicant, so now the 7 >> > day period to vote is opened. >> > >> > Good luck! >> > >> > Cheers >> out of curiosity: is

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-23 Thread Sébastien Luttringer
On mer., 2016-03-23 at 22:59 +0100, G. Schlisio wrote: > > > > Well, the 5 day period has ended to interview the applicant, so now the 7 > > day period to vote is opened. > > > > Good luck! > > > > Cheers > out of curiosity: is the voting over yet? > Yes and the motion was denied. Cheers, --

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-23 Thread G. Schlisio
> Well, the 5 day period has ended to interview the applicant, so now the 7 > day period to vote is opened. > > Good luck! > > Cheers out of curiosity: is the voting over yet? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-05 Thread Levente Polyak
On 03/02/2016 11:58 PM, Dustin Falgout wrote: >> To: aur-general@archlinux.org> From: anthr...@archlinux.org >> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:48:27 +0100 >> Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout >> >> On 03/02/2016 09:19 PM, Balló György wrote

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-05 Thread Alexandre Filgueira
2016-02-28 16:02 GMT-05:00 Dustin Falgout : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi Everyone, > > My name is Dustin Falgout (aka lots0logs) and this is my application to > join the Arch Linux project as a Trusted User. > > About Me: > > I'm 29 years old. I live on the Gulf Coast

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-02 Thread Balló György
2016-03-02 23:44 GMT+01:00 Dustin Falgout : > > Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:19:08 +0100> From: ballog...@gmail.com > > BTW, it would be nice if you could adopt some more orphan packages in the > > community repository. > > Sure, I could do that. Do you have any particular packages in mind that I > sh

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-02 Thread Dustin Falgout
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org> From: anthr...@archlinux.org > Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:48:27 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout > > On 03/02/2016 09:19 PM, Balló György wrote: > > If you don't specify tag or commit hash at the end of

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-02 Thread Dustin Falgout
> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:19:08 +0100> From: ballog...@gmail.com > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout > > 2016-03-02 20:21 GMT+01:00 Dustin Falgout : > > > If you are wondering why I didn't use the short v

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-02 Thread Levente Polyak
On 03/02/2016 09:19 PM, Balló György wrote: > If you don't specify tag or commit hash at the end of the git source, then > you should use the -git suffix. Users expect if the package has no -git > suffix, then it's a working static version tested by the maintainer, and > not some experimental code

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-02 Thread Balló György
2016-03-02 20:21 GMT+01:00 Dustin Falgout : > If you are wondering why I didn't use the short version of the commit hash > at the end of the pkgver, well that's simply a personal preference of mine > (to use revision numbers instead). I hope that helps clear up any confusion > as to why I chose to

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-02 Thread Dustin Falgout
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org> From: anthr...@archlinux.org > Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:28:58 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout > > On 03/02/2016 11:56 AM, Jan Alexander Steffens wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Levente Polya

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-02 Thread Levente Polyak
On 03/02/2016 11:56 AM, Jan Alexander Steffens wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Levente Polyak > wrote: >> That was fast, but I think you accidentally forgot to implement the most >> important part of my feedback: It is not allowed to have no pkgname VCS >> postfix (like -git) but pull f

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-02 Thread Jan Alexander Steffens
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Levente Polyak wrote: > That was fast, but I think you accidentally forgot to implement the most > important part of my feedback: It is not allowed to have no pkgname VCS > postfix (like -git) but pull from a git HEAD. > You either have to rename those packages or

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-02 Thread Levente Polyak
On 03/02/2016 04:16 AM, Dustin Falgout wrote: >> To: aur-general@archlinux.org> From: anthr...@archlinux.org >> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 17:12:04 +0100 >> Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout >> >> On 02/28/2016 10:02 PM, Dustin Falgout wrote

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-01 Thread Dustin Falgout
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org> From: anthr...@archlinux.org > Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 17:12:04 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout > > On 02/28/2016 10:02 PM, Dustin Falgout wrote: > > I currently maintain six or seven PKGBUILDS in the

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-01 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 03/01/2016 02:23 PM, Johannes Löthberg wrote: > Not just similarities, things that you might want to actually install > the whole group of, like base and base-devel & co. Not to mention the > fact that groups are pretty useless in the AUR either way. Groups aren't entirely useless in the AUR.

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-01 Thread Luchesar V. ILIEV
On 01/03/16 21:23, Johannes Löthberg wrote: > (...snip...) Not to mention the > fact that groups are pretty useless in the AUR either way. Well, they can be useful if you maintain a binary repo as well. I don't argue however with the other point that was made (and not quoted here). Cheers, Luches

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-01 Thread Johannes Löthberg
On 01/03, Levente Polyak wrote: pycharm-eap: ... - just my 2 cents but using groups with "development" "IDE" "editor" and "jetbrains" feels a bit too much, groups should logically group together similarities like "vim-plugins" and not used like generic keywords Not just similarities, thin

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-01 Thread Levente Polyak
On 02/28/2016 10:02 PM, Dustin Falgout wrote: > I currently maintain six or seven PKGBUILDS in the AUR, of which three are > notable: pycharm-eap[1], lightdm-webkit2-greeter[2], and > lightdm-webkit-theme-antergos[3]. I've indirectly contributed to other > packages in the AUR through comments by

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-01 Thread Dustin Falgout
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org> From: bpiotrow...@archlinux.org > Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:33:18 +0100 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout > > On 2016-02-28 22:02, Dustin Falgout wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > > > My name is Dustin Fa

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-01 Thread Alexandre Filgueira
2016-02-28 16:02 GMT-05:00 Dustin Falgout : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi Everyone, > > My name is Dustin Falgout (aka lots0logs) and this is my application to > join the Arch Linux project as a Trusted User. > > About Me: > > I'm 29 years old. I live on the Gulf Coast

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-01 Thread Jan Alexander Steffens
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > How exactly are you going to contribute to Arch, except maintaining > Cinnamon? Packages from AUR you mentioned aren't really notable (and in > fact, one just repackages proprietary tarball) and these in Antergos > repositories also se

Re: [aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-03-01 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
On 2016-02-28 22:02, Dustin Falgout wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > My name is Dustin Falgout (aka lots0logs) and this is my application to join > the Arch Linux project as a Trusted User. > > About Me: > > I'm 29 years old. I live on the Gulf Coast (USA). I work for a leading > WordPress Theme Comp

[aur-general] TU Application - Dustin Falgout

2016-02-28 Thread Dustin Falgout
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Everyone, My name is Dustin Falgout (aka lots0logs) and this is my application to join the Arch Linux project as a Trusted User. About Me: I'm 29 years old. I live on the Gulf Coast (USA). I work for a leading WordPress Theme Company where I