Hi everyone,
The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm
pleased to welcome him as a new TU.
The results are:
yes: 18
no: 1
abstain: 3
total: 22 (quorum has been met)
Instructions for new TUs are available at our wiki and I'll also
provide him with additional info
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm
pleased to welcome him as a new TU.
The results are:
yes: 18
no: 1
abstain: 3
total: 22 (quorum has been met)
Instructions for new
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 14:06:01 Alexander Rødseth wrote:
Hi everyone,
The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm
pleased to welcome him as a new TU.
The results are:
yes: 18
no: 1
abstain: 3
total: 22 (quorum has been met)
Instructions for new TUs are
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm
pleased to welcome him as a new TU.
Go hungarians! :)
ngaba and city-busz, is there any other hungarian in the team?
Congratulations, György!
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:36 PM, SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com wrote:
The voting period for György Balló (City-busz) has ended and I'm
pleased to welcome him as a new TU.
Go hungarians! :)
ngaba and
Le 14 mars 2012 14:56, Massimiliano Torromeo
massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:36 PM, SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com
wrote:
The voting period for György Balló (City-busz)
Op 14-03-12 21:46, Laurent Carlier schreef:
Le 14 mars 2012 14:56, Massimiliano Torromeo
massimiliano.torro...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:36 PM, SanskritFritz sanskritfr...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Alexander Rødseth rods...@gmail.com
wrote:
The
On 3 March 2012 11:38, Balló György ballog...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
thanks for the question.
I looked at your AUR packages and saw that you are maintaining the
unity desktop. I never used this desktop environment, but as a
curiosity is it something you want to eventually bring into
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
Is there a separate repo? Do you intend to start one otherwise? I
would really like to see unity accessible for Arch users.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unity ?
Is there a separate repo? Do you intend to start one otherwise? I
would really like to see unity accessible for Arch users.
Unity 2D is available in my [ayatana] repo[1] along with indicators. To
provide x86_64 packages, I'll need a build server.
Unity is a more difficult task, because it
On 03/03/2012 04:15 PM, Rashif Ray Rahman wrote:
On 3 March 2012 11:38, Balló György ballog...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
thanks for the question.
I looked at your AUR packages and saw that you are maintaining the
unity desktop. I never used this desktop environment, but as a
curiosity is it
!
Xiao-long Chen
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:13:11 +0100
From: ballog...@gmail.com
To: aur-general@archlinux.org
Subject: Re: [aur-general]TU Application - György Balló
Is there a separate repo? Do you intend to start one otherwise? I
would really like to see unity accessible for Arch
On 4 March 2012 00:12, Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org wrote:
Unity is only a Canonical project, not a project that can be used by anyone.
It's just about accessibility, so as to not deprive anyone and allow
no-one to say there is no foo in Arch :D
But I guess if it's that much PITA then it
Am Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:59:56 +1100
schrieb Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org:
Like I said, nobody cares.
Oh, you are nobody? Interesting.
If you have problems reading between the lines, try growing up.
Between the lines are spaces otherwise there would be other lines. I'd
say, the one who
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:27:39 +0100
schrieb Balló György ballog...@gmail.com:
I understand Heiko's opinion and now I replaced these hackish split
packages by individual packages even if it's requires more maintenance
time on updates. So now users should able to install all of my
packages with
On 03/02/2012 08:17 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:59:56 +1100
schrieb Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org:
Like I said, nobody cares.
Oh, you are nobody? Interesting.
If you have problems reading between the lines, try growing up.
Between the lines are spaces otherwise
On 02/03/12 21:38, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:27:39 +0100
schrieb Balló György ballog...@gmail.com:
I understand Heiko's opinion and now I replaced these hackish split
packages by individual packages even if it's requires more maintenance
time on updates. So now users should
Le 2012-03-02 06:17, Heiko Baums a écrit :
Am Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:59:56 +1100
schrieb Gaetan Bissonbis...@archlinux.org:
Like I said, nobody cares.
Oh, you are nobody? Interesting.
If you have problems reading between the lines, try growing up.
Between the lines are spaces otherwise there
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:11:21 -0500
schrieb Stéphane Gaudreault steph...@archlinux.org:
STOP.
Heiko, you had the chance to express you opinion about this
application (and you did it in a totally inappropiate way).
I didn't do it in a inappropriate way. I did it in a factual way and
explained
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:01:59 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
I see what was done there... makedepends in split packages probably
need to become depends when built as individual packages.
@György: Let that be a lesson in being careful when making
reactionary changes to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/12 10:06, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:11:21 -0500 schrieb Stéphane Gaudreault
steph...@archlinux.org:
STOP.
Heiko, you had the chance to express you opinion about this
application (and you did it in a totally
On 02/03/12 23:16, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:01:59 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
I see what was done there... makedepends in split packages probably
need to become depends when built as individual packages.
@György: Let that be a lesson in being careful
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:22:46 -0300
schrieb Angel Velásquez an...@archlinux.org:
Heiko,
I've always had several discussions with you, now Gaetan, and many
people seems to have disagree with your opinion.
If they disagree with my opinion, they can happily explain why. I
explained my concerns.
This thread is kind of fun to read, from a sociological perspective :)
It is however sad when one considers that all the energy put into
writing these emails could have been put into either
- address AUR's shortcomings when it comes to split packages, or
- address the different AUR builders
On 02/03/12 23:40, Allan McRae wrote:
On 02/03/12 23:16, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:01:59 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
I see what was done there... makedepends in split packages probably
need to become depends when built as individual packages.
@György:
Allan McRae wrote:
Since when it is a good packaging quality to upload packages which
can't be installed?
They can be installed. Or do you mean can not be installed by an AUR
helper? In which case you are still wrong due to the extra dependency line.
I think this point should be
Xyne wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
Since when it is a good packaging quality to upload packages which
can't be installed?
They can be installed. Or do you mean can not be installed by an AUR
helper? In which case you are still wrong due to the extra dependency line.
I think
Am Fri, 2 Mar 2012 18:49:47 +
schrieb Xyne x...@archlinux.ca:
The choice
of Bash was myopic and lazy in my opinion, and something that should
be reversed as far as possible, not glorified.
Don't say that too loud, because Gentoo's ebuilds are principally bash,
too, but Gentoo has its own
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:40:55 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
Where is it written that you can't do that? PKGBUILDs are bash. Any
valid bash is a valid PKGBUILD.
So, what if I would build a package which contains an .install file
with an `rm -Rf /` in its post_install()
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:40:55 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
Where is it written that you can't do that? PKGBUILDs are bash. Any
valid bash is a valid PKGBUILD.
So, what if I would build a package which contains an
Le 2012-03-01 13:00, Balló György a écrit :
Hello everybody,
I'm applying to be a Trusted User.
I'm a 24 years old Hungarian web developer, and I'm using Arch Linux as my main
system since 2010 summer. Before that I used a Debian-based distro for one
year. In my free time I like surfing on
Hi,
I'm also in favor of György.
He is the best candidate I have seen lately and his presentation is clean.
I would like someone like him around to help the community.
Also, if I pay attention to the other posts, my opinion is... the AUR is a
HELPER tool.
It's only used as a time saver, but it
Hi,
thanks for the question.
I looked at your AUR packages and saw that you are maintaining the
unity desktop. I never used this desktop environment, but as a
curiosity is it something you want to eventually bring into [community] ?
I worked a lot on making Unity and indicators usable on
Hello everybody,
I'm applying to be a Trusted User.
I'm a 24 years old Hungarian web developer, and I'm using Arch Linux as my main
system since 2010 summer. Before that I used a Debian-based distro for one
year. In my free time I like surfing on the net, contributing to OpenStreetMap,
On 03/01/2012 08:00 PM, Balló György wrote:
Hello everybody,
Hey
I'm applying to be a Trusted User.
At last!
I'm a 24 years old Hungarian web developer, and I'm using Arch Linux as my
main system since 2010 summer. Before that I used a Debian-based distro for
one year. In my free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/12 15:00, Balló György wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm applying to be a Trusted User.
I'm a 24 years old Hungarian web developer, and I'm using Arch
Linux as my main system since 2010 summer. Before that I used a
Debian-based distro for
Am Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:00:52 +0100
schrieb Balló György ballog...@gmail.com:
I currently have 150 packages in AUR with a total of 5775 votes. I
already maintain more than 200 packages as source packages on
github[4] and as built i686 packages in my [ayatana] repo[5]. I don't
want to move all
On 03/01/2012 09:29 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:00:52 +0100
schrieb Balló György ballog...@gmail.com:
I currently have 150 packages in AUR with a total of 5775 votes. I
already maintain more than 200 packages as source packages on
github[4] and as built i686 packages in my
Am Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:46:41 +0200
schrieb Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org:
Most GTK2 GTK3 ports are hard to be supported in AUR since most of the
time it depends on what packages a user has installed on his system
and may be picked different because almost 99% of our users do not
compile in
I am his sponsor indeed, and I am proud to lure forth such a fine candidate.
He has adopted packages in AUR that were moved from [community] because
they were problematic orphans and we (TUs) didn't want to maintain them,
then fixed them up beautifully. My impression is that he doesn't shy away
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:16:28PM +0100, Heiko Baums wrote:
Am Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:46:41 +0200
schrieb Ionut Biru ib...@archlinux.org:
Most GTK2 GTK3 ports are hard to be supported in AUR since most of the
time it depends on what packages a user has installed on his system
and may be
Am Thu, 1 Mar 2012 16:27:45 -0500
schrieb Dave Reisner d...@falconindy.com:
Feel free to provide such PKGBUILDs and actually prove that this can
be done rather than soapboxing about something that he isn't doing.
It's just that simple.
I guess you are kidding, aren't you?
1. I'm not
[2012-03-01 23:35:16 +0100] Heiko Baums:
I guess you are kidding, aren't you?
Nobody cares what you guess.
Just quit posing for an expert on everything already.
--
Gaetan
On Thursday 01 Mar 2012 23:35:16 Heiko Baums wrote:
4. AUR is meant for providing PKGBUILDs for other users, so that they
don't need to do the same work again (writing the PKGBUILDs). Since
e.g. indicator-messages can't be installed by other users - at least
not with yaourt
Sounds like you
Am Fri, 2 Mar 2012 09:51:41 +1100
schrieb Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org:
[2012-03-01 23:35:16 +0100] Heiko Baums:
I guess you are kidding, aren't you?
Nobody cares what you guess.
Just quit posing for an expert on everything already.
Are you sure that your attitude is the right
On 02/03/12 08:35, Heiko Baums wrote:
If he wants to maintain packages then he should do it in a way that
they apply to the official policies. And split packages are officially
NOT supported by AUR, not even with this dirty workaround, which is
fact, well known and often discussed, so I don't
I understand Heiko's opinion and now I replaced these hackish split
packages by individual packages even if it's requires more maintenance
time on updates. So now users should able to install all of my packages
with AUR helpers, however I don't use these tools at all. I hope that
AUR once will
Am Thu, 01 Mar 2012 23:10:11 +
schrieb Peter Lewis ple...@aur.archlinux.org:
On Thursday 01 Mar 2012 23:35:16 Heiko Baums wrote:
4. AUR is meant for providing PKGBUILDs for other users, so that
they don't need to do the same work again (writing the PKGBUILDs).
Since e.g.
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 09:21:33 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
You do realize who first came up with the workaround for adding split
packages to the AUR... Because from memory it was figured out in the
TU IRC channel.
I don't know, because I'm not in the IRC channels. But if I
On 02/03/12 09:37, Heiko Baums wrote:
I just see a PKGBUILD which doesn't apply to the official
policies.
You keep saying official policies... Where is this official policy
document that says do not use the split PKGBUILD hack to upload packages
to the AUR?
Yes, the AUR does not support split
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Balló György ballog...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm applying to be a Trusted User.
I'm a 24 years old Hungarian web developer, and I'm using Arch Linux as my
main system since 2010 summer. Before that I used a Debian-based distro for
one year. In
Am Fri, 02 Mar 2012 09:51:16 +1000
schrieb Allan McRae al...@archlinux.org:
You keep saying official policies... Where is this official policy
document that says do not use the split PKGBUILD hack to upload
packages to the AUR?
Yes, the AUR does not support split packages. But there is
[2012-03-02 00:13:33 +0100] Heiko Baums:
Are you sure that your attitude is the right one?
Yes.
And that comes from a dev who should know about packaging standards,
policies and packaging quality.
Such as quoting variables that may contain whitespace?
--
Gaetan
Am Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:36:18 +1100
schrieb Gaetan Bisson bis...@archlinux.org:
[2012-03-02 00:13:33 +0100] Heiko Baums:
Are you sure that your attitude is the right one?
Yes.
Not me.
And that comes from a dev who should know about packaging standards,
policies and packaging quality.
Hi,
which languages do you use to develop web?
I mainly work with HTML/CSS, but currently I'm learning
JavaScript/jQuery and PHP.
--
György Balló
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[2012-03-02 01:44:02 +0100] Heiko Baums:
Not me.
Like I said, nobody cares.
But you know what you want to say?
If you have problems reading between the lines, try growing up.
--
Gaetan
56 matches
Mail list logo
