Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 12 December 2010 11:39, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun 12 Dec 2010 04:21 +0100, Xyne wrote:
The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of
the TU
On Thu 16 Dec 2010 01:32 +0100, Xyne wrote:
Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 12 December 2010 11:39, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun 12 Dec 2010 04:21 +0100, Xyne wrote:
The following is a proposed
Loui Chang wrote:
Just make a copy of the bylaws html file, alter it, and make a diff.
It isn't a ridiculous request because people may not be clear on what
text is being removed or added, so you should make such changes
unambiguous with a patch. The bylaws also call for a patch for any
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Ray Rashif sc...@archlinux.org wrote:
On 12 December 2010 11:39, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun 12 Dec 2010 04:21 +0100, Xyne wrote:
The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of the
TU
bylaws:
On 12 December 2010 11:39, Loui Chang louipc@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun 12 Dec 2010 04:21 +0100, Xyne wrote:
The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of the TU
bylaws:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendmentoldid=124557
The changes address
The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of the TU
bylaws:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendmentoldid=124557
The changes address several issues recently brought up on this list. Briefly,
these include:
* enabling a vote to pass in the absence of
On Sun 12 Dec 2010 04:21 +0100, Xyne wrote:
The following is a proposed replacement for the current SVP section of the TU
bylaws:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bylaw_Amendmentoldid=124557
The changes address several issues recently brought up on this list. Briefly,
these
On 12/11/10 22:21, Xyne wrote:
The changes address several issues recently brought up on this list. Briefly,
these include:
* enabling a vote to pass in the absence of quorum when more than 50% of active
TUs have voted YES
* enabling a vote to fail in the absence of quorum when 50% or more of
