Re: [aur-general] TU Bylaws Amendment (SVP Section): Voting Period

2011-01-23 Thread Loui Chang
On Sat 15 Jan 2011 20:10 +0100, Xyne wrote: Christopher Brannon wrote: Shouldn't this be: the number of no votes is greater than or equal to half the number of active TUs? Yes it should. Here's a corrected patch: http://aur.pastebin.com/dBdinYb9 Thank you. I've applied the patch. See

Re: [aur-general] TU Bylaws Amendment (SVP Section): Voting Period

2011-01-15 Thread Xyne
Christopher Brannon wrote: Shouldn't this be: the number of no votes is greater than or equal to half the number of active TUs? Yes it should. Here's a corrected patch: http://aur.pastebin.com/dBdinYb9

Re: [aur-general] TU Bylaws Amendment (SVP Section): Voting Period

2011-01-14 Thread Christopher Brannon
Xyne x...@archlinux.ca writes: The voting period has begun. TUs, please vote: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu.php?id=45 Both the patch and the wiki page contain the following typo. I'll quote From the patch. + The proposal is rejected if EITHER + /p +