Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-30 Thread edogawaconan
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Lukas Fleischer wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:05:28PM +0700, edogawaconan wrote: >> sure it has one. >> >> http://pastebin.com/m2d0bd65d > > This is rather a bug in the AUR "pkgsubmit.php" script. In each line, > everything follwing a pound sign ("#") is stri

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-30 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 05:05:28PM +0700, edogawaconan wrote: > sure it has one. > > http://pastebin.com/m2d0bd65d This is rather a bug in the AUR "pkgsubmit.php" script. In each line, everything follwing a pound sign ("#") is stripped since it is considered to be a comment. As every line of the

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread Eric BĂ©langer
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:29 PM, edogawaconan wrote: > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Chris Brannon wrote: >>> After 'cleaning up' a package I'm maintaining (nginx-unstable), and >>> verifying it can be built and works fine, AUR rejected the package. >>> Reverting to old version (with updated v

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread edogawaconan
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Chris Brannon wrote: >> After 'cleaning up' a package I'm maintaining (nginx-unstable), and >> verifying it can be built and works fine, AUR rejected the package. >> Reverting to old version (with updated version) works fine. >> >> error message: >> "Missing build

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread Chris Brannon
> After 'cleaning up' a package I'm maintaining (nginx-unstable), and > verifying it can be built and works fine, AUR rejected the package. > Reverting to old version (with updated version) works fine. > > error message: > "Missing build function in PKGBUILD." Ok, this is a longshot, but its wort

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread Daenyth Blank
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:30, Vojtech Horky wrote: > Just a guess - what about missing backslashes at the end of the line > in the source array (lines 28 to 30)? > You don't need backslashes at the end of lines inside an array declaration.

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread Vojtech Horky
2009/11/29 edogawaconan : > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Allan McRae wrote: >> edogawaconan wrote: >>> >>> After 'cleaning up' a package I'm maintaining (nginx-unstable), and >>> verifying it can be built and works fine, AUR rejected the package. >>> Reverting to old version (with updated vers

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread Ray Rashif
2009/11/30 edogawaconan > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Ray Rashif > wrote: > > 2009/11/29 edogawaconan > > Move all the custom variables below pkgname. > > > > > > same result > > -- > O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org > Add a maintainer tag (although I have

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread edogawaconan
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Ray Rashif wrote: > 2009/11/29 edogawaconan > Move all the custom variables below pkgname. > > same result -- O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread Ray Rashif
2009/11/29 edogawaconan > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > > edogawaconan wrote: > >> > >> After 'cleaning up' a package I'm maintaining (nginx-unstable), and > >> verifying it can be built and works fine, AUR rejected the package. > >> Reverting to old version (with updated

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread edogawaconan
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Allan McRae wrote: > edogawaconan wrote: >> >> After 'cleaning up' a package I'm maintaining (nginx-unstable), and >> verifying it can be built and works fine, AUR rejected the package. >> Reverting to old version (with updated version) works fine. >> >> error mess

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread Ionut Biru
On 11/29/2009 11:38 AM, Gergely Imreh wrote: 2009/11/29 Allan McRae: edogawaconan wrote: After 'cleaning up' a package I'm maintaining (nginx-unstable), and verifying it can be built and works fine, AUR rejected the package. Reverting to old version (with updated version) works fine. error me

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread Gergely Imreh
2009/11/29 Allan McRae : > edogawaconan wrote: >> >> After 'cleaning up' a package I'm maintaining (nginx-unstable), and >> verifying it can be built and works fine, AUR rejected the package. >> Reverting to old version (with updated version) works fine. >> >> error message: >> "Missing build funct

Re: [aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread Allan McRae
edogawaconan wrote: After 'cleaning up' a package I'm maintaining (nginx-unstable), and verifying it can be built and works fine, AUR rejected the package. Reverting to old version (with updated version) works fine. error message: "Missing build function in PKGBUILD." package: http://aur.archli

[aur-general] Unable to submit package

2009-11-29 Thread edogawaconan
After 'cleaning up' a package I'm maintaining (nginx-unstable), and verifying it can be built and works fine, AUR rejected the package. Reverting to old version (with updated version) works fine. error message: "Missing build function in PKGBUILD." package: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?I