I don't think there's any particular policy regarding which package
versions should be provided by a *-beta package. That said, I agree with
Martti Kuhne: a "beta if there is one" package makes much more sense than
an "always beta" package. In other words, always keep the *-beta package as
up to d
I don't think there's any particular policy regarding which package
versions should be provided by a *-beta package. That said, I agree with
Martti Kuhne: a "beta if there is one" package makes much more sense than
an "always beta" package. In other words, always keep the *-beta package as
up to da
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Evert Van Petegem
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I currently maintain the netbeans-beta package in the AUR. I was wondering,
> since netbeans was updated to 8.0 today (not yet in the official
> repositories), whether I should leave it at the latest development release
> (rc1) o
Hi,
I currently maintain the netbeans-beta package in the AUR. I was
wondering, since netbeans was updated to 8.0 today (not yet in the
official repositories), whether I should leave it at the latest
development release (rc1) or upgrade to stable. Of course if/when 9.0
beta is released I will
