Re: [aur-general] When should pkgrel be updated?

2011-04-01 Thread Ray Rashif
On 1 April 2011 23:48, Thomas S Hatch wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Dave Reisner wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:31:34PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >> > On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:21 -0300, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: >> > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Ray Rashif >> w

Re: [aur-general] When should pkgrel be updated?

2011-04-01 Thread Thomas S Hatch
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Dave Reisner wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:31:34PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:21 -0300, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Ray Rashif > wrote: > > > > On 1 April 2011 08:12, Oon-Ee Ng wrote

Re: [aur-general] When should pkgrel be updated?

2011-04-01 Thread Dave Reisner
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:31:34PM +0200, Jelle van der Waa wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:21 -0300, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: > > > On 1 April 2011 08:12, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > > >> I've seen (in the past) various packages on the AUR wh

Re: [aur-general] When should pkgrel be updated?

2011-04-01 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:21 -0300, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: > > On 1 April 2011 08:12, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > >> I've seen (in the past) various packages on the AUR which jumped by 3 > >> or 4 pkgrels in a very short period of time. Sometimes

Re: [aur-general] When should pkgrel be updated?

2011-04-01 Thread Denis A . Altoé Falqueto
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: > On 1 April 2011 08:12, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: >> I've seen (in the past) various packages on the AUR which jumped by 3 >> or 4 pkgrels in a very short period of time. Sometimes it happens like >> this:- >> >> 1. Maintainer changes something and breaks

Re: [aur-general] When should pkgrel be updated?

2011-04-01 Thread Ray Rashif
On 1 April 2011 08:12, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > I've seen (in the past) various packages on the AUR which jumped by 3 > or 4 pkgrels in a very short period of time. Sometimes it happens like > this:- > > 1. Maintainer changes something and breaks the package with pkgrel=2 > 2. Bug reported on comments.

Re: [aur-general] When should pkgrel be updated?

2011-03-31 Thread Heiko Baums
Am Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:12:42 +0800 schrieb Oon-Ee Ng : > I've seen (in the past) various packages on the AUR which jumped by 3 > or 4 pkgrels in a very short period of time. Sometimes it happens like > this:- > > 1. Maintainer changes something and breaks the package with pkgrel=2 > 2. Bug reporte

Re: [aur-general] When should pkgrel be updated?

2011-03-31 Thread Dave Reisner
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 08:12:42AM +0800, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: > I've seen (in the past) various packages on the AUR which jumped by 3 > or 4 pkgrels in a very short period of time. Sometimes it happens like > this:- > > 1. Maintainer changes something and breaks the package with pkgrel=2 > 2. Bug rep

[aur-general] When should pkgrel be updated?

2011-03-31 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
I've seen (in the past) various packages on the AUR which jumped by 3 or 4 pkgrels in a very short period of time. Sometimes it happens like this:- 1. Maintainer changes something and breaks the package with pkgrel=2 2. Bug reported on comments. Maintainer reverts change and makes pkgrel=3 It can