[aur-general] aur.archlinux.org down?

2010-12-22 Thread Seblu
$ ping aur.archlinux.org PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. >From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded >From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded ^C --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss,

Re: [aur-general] aur.archlinux.org down?

2010-12-22 Thread Det
Yeah. Can't update my package until they get it back up and running again. On 12/22/10, Seblu wrote: > $ ping aur.archlinux.org > PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. > From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded > From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded

Re: [aur-general] aur.archlinux.org down?

2010-12-22 Thread Det
Not that anybody's gonna download it in the meantime ^^. On 12/22/10, Det wrote: > Yeah. Can't update my package until they get it back up and running again. > > On 12/22/10, Seblu wrote: >> $ ping aur.archlinux.org >> PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. >> From 67.69.22

Re: [aur-general] aur.archlinux.org down?

2010-12-22 Thread Ionuț Bîru
On 12/22/2010 11:03 PM, Seblu wrote: $ ping aur.archlinux.org PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded ^C --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0

Re: [aur-general] aur.archlinux.org down?

2010-12-22 Thread Xyne
Ionuț Bîru wrote: > PANIC > > is not our problem. seems that provider has some networking issues. even > their website is down. > > sevenl.net > > -- > Ionuț Wtf did Allan do this time?

Re: [aur-general] aur.archlinux.org down?

2010-12-22 Thread Allan McRae
On 23/12/10 12:38, Xyne wrote: Ionuț Bîru wrote: PANIC is not our problem. seems that provider has some networking issues. even their website is down. sevenl.net -- Ionuț Wtf did Allan do this time? I was asleep...

Re: [aur-general] aur.archlinux.org down?

2010-12-22 Thread Xyne
Allan McRae wrote: > On 23/12/10 12:38, Xyne wrote: > > Ionuț Bîru wrote: > > > >> PANIC > >> > >> is not our problem. seems that provider has some networking issues. even > >> their website is down. > >> > >> sevenl.net > >> > >> -- > >> Ionuț > > > > Wtf did Allan do this time? > > > > I was as

Re: [aur-general] aur.archlinux.org down?

2010-12-24 Thread Seblu
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: > On 12/22/2010 11:03 PM, Seblu wrote: >> >> $ ping aur.archlinux.org >> PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. >>  From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded >>  From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded >>

Re: [aur-general] aur.archlinux.org down?

2010-12-24 Thread Leonid Isaev
On (12/24/10 15:57), Seblu wrote: -~> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Ionuț Bîru wrote: -~> > On 12/22/2010 11:03 PM, Seblu wrote: -~> >> -~> >> $ ping aur.archlinux.org -~> >> PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. -~> >>  From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded

Re: [aur-general] aur.archlinux.org down?

2010-12-24 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 22.12.2010 22:03, schrieb Seblu: > $ ping aur.archlinux.org > PING aur.archlinux.org (208.92.232.29) 56(84) bytes of data. >>From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=1 Time to live exceeded >>From 67.69.228.37 icmp_seq=2 Time to live exceeded > ^C > --- aur.archlinux.org ping statistics --- > 2 packets transm