On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 9:54 PM, WorMzy Tykashi
wrote:
> On 17 September 2013 16:06, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
>
>> On 17 September 2013 15:39, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:23 PM, WorMzy Tykashi
>>> wrote:
>
> Okay, it looks like development on the -next branch has d
On 17 September 2013 16:06, WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
> On 17 September 2013 15:39, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:23 PM, WorMzy Tykashi
>> wrote:
>> > As it stands, the new testing/btrfs-progs is building the same tools as
>> the
>> > btrfs-progs-git PKGBUILD (albeit wi
On 17 September 2013 15:39, Sébastien Luttringer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:23 PM, WorMzy Tykashi
> wrote:
> > As it stands, the new testing/btrfs-progs is building the same tools as
> the
> > btrfs-progs-git PKGBUILD (albeit with !staticlibs), extra/btrfs-progs is
> > still quite behind
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:23 PM, WorMzy Tykashi
wrote:
> As it stands, the new testing/btrfs-progs is building the same tools as the
> btrfs-progs-git PKGBUILD (albeit with !staticlibs), extra/btrfs-progs is
> still quite behind.
>
> Once the testing package hits extra, btrfs-progs-git will be red
As it stands, the new testing/btrfs-progs is building the same tools as the
btrfs-progs-git PKGBUILD (albeit with !staticlibs), extra/btrfs-progs is
still quite behind.
Once the testing package hits extra, btrfs-progs-git will be redundant (at
least until Chris pulls in more commits). I guess the
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 5:35 PM, WorMzy Tykashi
wrote:
> Hi, I've submitted two new btrfs packages to the AUR:
> btrfs-progs-unstable-integration [0] and
> btrfs-progs-unstable-integration-git [1], and I'd like opinions on the
> state of things:
>
> a) should btrfs-progs-git [2] should be merged w
Hi, I've submitted two new btrfs packages to the AUR:
btrfs-progs-unstable-integration [0] and
btrfs-progs-unstable-integration-git [1], and I'd like opinions on the
state of things:
a) should btrfs-progs-git [2] should be merged with
btrfs-progs-unstable-integration-git, given that the latter is
