A user is requesting that the md5deep package name be changed to hashdeep,
which I agree seems consistent with the project maintainer's wishes, since
all development of md5deep has been moved to github under the hashdeep
name. Do any Trusted Users have strong feelings about this or advice for
me?
OK, I'm not a TU (yet?)... but as the person that contacted you
probably did so because of a post to this ML of mine from 5 days ago,
I think I should link this [1] here.
A few people replied, and md5deep was decided as the real name for
the package. I have strong feelings that it should remain
Thanks for the link, I looked at that and the other june archives to get up
to speed on the discussion. There seems to be some ambiguity on the part of
the upstream project, md5deep is definitely the historical name, because
hashdeep was a seperate but related tool by the same author, and md5deep
On 06/06, Steven Honeyman wrote:
OK, I'm not a TU (yet?)... but as the person that contacted you
probably did so because of a post to this ML of mine from 5 days ago,
I think I should link this [1] here.
A few people replied, and md5deep was decided as the real name for
the package. I have
Maybe I should try as well, see what he prefers, if anything.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Johannes Löthberg johan...@kyriasis.com
wrote:
On 06/06, Steven Honeyman wrote:
OK, I'm not a TU (yet?)... but as the person that contacted you
probably did so because of a post to this ML of mine
