Re: [aur-general] Delete Git tree for new package with broken state

2019-03-28 Thread lambdadroid via aur-general
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 04:05:06PM +0100, Robin Broda via aur-general wrote: > On 3/27/19 1:43 PM, lambdadroid via aur-general wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been trying to upload packages from archlinux-me176c [1] to the > > AUR. My scripts create a subtree split of one package, then do quite > > a

Re: [aur-general] Delete Git tree for new package with broken state

2019-03-28 Thread Robin Broda via aur-general
On 3/27/19 1:43 PM, lambdadroid via aur-general wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to upload packages from archlinux-me176c [1] to the > AUR. My scripts create a subtree split of one package, then do quite > a bit of other magic and upload it to the AUR. > > I've been having a few problems with "l

[aur-general] Delete Git tree for new package with broken state

2019-03-27 Thread lambdadroid via aur-general
Hi, I've been trying to upload packages from archlinux-me176c [1] to the AUR. My scripts create a subtree split of one package, then do quite a bit of other magic and upload it to the AUR. I've been having a few problems with "linux-me176c" because I used to have large patch files in the reposito

Re: [aur-general] Delete spam comment/account from aur

2018-06-15 Thread Andrew Crerar
On 6/15/18 5:13 AM, Cedric Girard wrote: > On 2018-06-08 13:01, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 11:36:54AM +0200, Maxim Andersson via >> aur-general wrote: >>> Regarding this page >>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aur-comment-fetcher-git/ >>> >>> Could the c

Re: [aur-general] Delete spam comment/account from aur

2018-06-15 Thread Cedric Girard
On 2018-06-08 13:01, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote: On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 11:36:54AM +0200, Maxim Andersson via aur-general wrote: Regarding this page https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aur-comment-fetcher-git/ Could the comment from 2018-06-06 (and maybe spammer-account?) please be

Re: [aur-general] Delete spam comment/account from aur

2018-06-08 Thread Morten Linderud via aur-general
On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 11:36:54AM +0200, Maxim Andersson via aur-general wrote: > Regarding this page > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aur-comment-fetcher-git/ > > Could the comment from 2018-06-06 (and maybe spammer-account?) please > be deleted. As a headsup. I removed the comment and del

[aur-general] Delete spam comment/account from aur

2018-06-07 Thread Maxim Andersson via aur-general
Regarding this page https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/aur-comment-fetcher-git/ Could the comment from 2018-06-06 (and maybe spammer-account?) please be deleted. Thanks!

Re: [aur-general] delete request for msh-git

2016-11-24 Thread Eli Schwartz via aur-general
On 11/24/2016 05:47 PM, Myles English via aur-general wrote: > Hello, > Please could a TU delete > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mshr-git/ > > it has been provided as part of dolfin-git for some time (I am the > maintainer). > > Thanks, > Myles > Use "Submit Request" from Package Action

Re: [aur-general] delete request for msh-git

2016-11-24 Thread G. Schlisio
> Hello, > Please could a TU delete > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mshr-git/ > > it has been provided as part of dolfin-git for some time (I am the > maintainer). > > Thanks, > Myles > You should file a request via AUR web interface. Thats the official way to do what you intend. regar

[aur-general] delete request for msh-git

2016-11-24 Thread Myles English via aur-general
Hello, Please could a TU delete https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mshr-git/ it has been provided as part of dolfin-git for some time (I am the maintainer). Thanks, Myles

Re: [aur-general] Delete request for linux-yoga900{, -{headers, docs}}

2016-07-25 Thread Marcin Wieczorek
On Mon, 2016-07-25 at 10:53 -0400, Eric Lehmann wrote: > I created this package to make some custom modifications to better > support the new laptop I got. I recently tested an installation on my > Yoga900 without any issues. As the system works fine now with the > latest kernel, I feel this packag

[aur-general] Delete request for linux-yoga900{,-{headers,docs}}

2016-07-25 Thread Eric Lehmann
I created this package to make some custom modifications to better support the new laptop I got. I recently tested an installation on my Yoga900 without any issues. As the system works fine now with the latest kernel, I feel this package is nolonger needed and can be deleted. 

Re: [aur-general] Delete (or merge) the evolve-journal-git package

2015-04-05 Thread Bogdan Cuza
Thanks! On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Marcel Korpel wrote: > * Bogdan Cuza (Sun, 5 Apr 2015 22:02:07 +0300): > > I am the maintainer of the evolve-journal-git package. Recently, > > Evolve OS changed its name to the Solus Project and therefore some > > packages in the AUR need to be renamed.

Re: [aur-general] Delete (or merge) the evolve-journal-git package

2015-04-05 Thread Marcel Korpel
* Bogdan Cuza (Sun, 5 Apr 2015 22:02:07 +0300): > I am the maintainer of the evolve-journal-git package. Recently, > Evolve OS changed its name to the Solus Project and therefore some > packages in the AUR need to be renamed. I uploaded a new package > called solus-journal-git, so I am requesting

[aur-general] Delete (or merge) the evolve-journal-git package

2015-04-05 Thread Bogdan Cuza
Hi! I am the maintainer of the evolve-journal-git package. Recently, Evolve OS changed its name to the Solus Project and therefore some packages in the AUR need to be renamed. I uploaded a new package called solus-journal-git, so I am requesting either the merging of the two or deletion of evolve-j

Re: [aur-general] Delete ipycli-git

2014-12-29 Thread David Phillips
That thread [1] died a while ago. See the last message on that thread: > Sounds like a good idea. Who do we go to in order to get something like this done? Can any TU get this done, or what? We're stuck until we can contact the right person. [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.arch.tur.use

Re: [aur-general] Delete ipycli-git

2014-12-28 Thread Justin Dray
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:37:20 +1300, David Phillips wrote: > > From https://aur.archlinux.org/ : > > > > > Package orphan requests, merge requests, and deletion requests > > > should be filed in the Package Actions box. > > > > > > This point

Re: [aur-general] Delete ipycli-git

2014-12-28 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 13:37:20 +1300, David Phillips wrote: > From https://aur.archlinux.org/ : > > > Package orphan requests, merge requests, and deletion requests > > should be filed in the Package Actions box. > > > This point has also been brought up at least twice a week for the last > six mo

Re: [aur-general] Delete ipycli-git

2014-12-28 Thread David Phillips
>From https://aur.archlinux.org/ : > Package orphan requests, merge requests, and deletion requests should be > filed in the Package Actions box. This point has also been brought up at least twice a week for the last six months on this list. Cheers On 29/12/2014, François Boulogne wrote: > H

[aur-general] Delete ipycli-git

2014-12-28 Thread François Boulogne
Hi, Please delete ipycli-git. It's my package. The reason is that the project is not compatible with last ipython versions and it's not maintained any more. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ipycli-git/ Thank you. -- François Boulogne. http://www.sciunto.org GPG: 32D5F22F

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

2014-12-20 Thread Johannes Löthberg
On 20/12, sxe wrote: The maintainer switched to GIT only so i renamed the package. Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdestyle-kvantum-kde4/ Delete requests are filed from the aur web interface now, under the ‘File request’ link in the box on the right on the package’s page.

[aur-general] Delete request

2014-12-20 Thread sxe
The maintainer switched to GIT only so i renamed the package. Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdestyle-kvantum-kde4/ Thanks, Andy

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: meld-beta

2014-11-28 Thread Taylor Lookabaugh
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014, 10:29 Marcel Korpel wrote: > * Taylor Lookabaugh (Fri, 28 Nov 2014 > 08:20:07 +): > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014, 02:13 Gary van der Merwe > > wrote: > > > > Please delete meld-beta. The new gtk3 port is now available in extra, > > so I don't plan on maintaining this packag

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: meld-beta

2014-11-28 Thread Marcel Korpel
* Taylor Lookabaugh (Fri, 28 Nov 2014 08:20:07 +): > On Fri, Nov 28, 2014, 02:13 Gary van der Merwe > wrote: > > Please delete meld-beta. The new gtk3 port is now available in extra, > so I don't plan on maintaining this package further. Those who want to > use dev versions should rather us

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: meld-beta

2014-11-28 Thread Taylor Lookabaugh
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014, 02:34 Gary van der Merwe wrote: Sorry guys. I was not aware if this new feature. Thanks. On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:19 AM, G. Schlisio wrote: > hey pal, > i'm sorry to inform you that you are doing it wrong. > please go to the aur interface and use the button "file a re

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: meld-beta

2014-11-28 Thread Gary van der Merwe
Sorry guys. I was not aware if this new feature. Thanks. On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:19 AM, G. Schlisio wrote: > hey pal, > i'm sorry to inform you that you are doing it wrong. > please go to the aur interface and use the button "file a request" to > get this deleted. > regards

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: meld-beta

2014-11-28 Thread Taylor Lookabaugh
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014, 02:13 Gary van der Merwe wrote: Please delete meld-beta. The new gtk3 port is now available in extra, so I don't plan on maintaining this package further. Those who want to use dev versions should rather use meld-git. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/meld-beta/ Thanks,

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: meld-beta

2014-11-28 Thread G. Schlisio
Am 28.11.2014 um 09:13 schrieb Gary van der Merwe: > Please delete meld-beta. The new gtk3 port is now available in extra, > so I don't plan on maintaining this package further. Those who want to > use dev versions should rather use meld-git. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/meld-beta/ > >

[aur-general] Delete request: meld-beta

2014-11-28 Thread Gary van der Merwe
Please delete meld-beta. The new gtk3 port is now available in extra, so I don't plan on maintaining this package further. Those who want to use dev versions should rather use meld-git. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/meld-beta/ Thanks, Gary

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request

2014-08-08 Thread Johannes Löthberg
On 08/08, sxe wrote: The maintainer switched to GIT only so i renamed the package. Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdestyle-kvantum-kde4/ Requests are sent from the AUR web interface now. Log into the AUR, go to the package's page and click 'File request' in the action box t

[aur-general] Delete Request

2014-08-08 Thread sxe
The maintainer switched to GIT only so i renamed the package. Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kdestyle-kvantum-kde4/ Thanks, Andy

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: xfreq-intel-git

2014-06-25 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Tuesday 24 June 2014 19:13:02 c...@free.fr wrote: > I am the developer / package creator and accidentally made this entry: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xfreq-intel-git/ > > May you please remove it from the AUR Done, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev

[aur-general] Delete request: xfreq-intel-git

2014-06-24 Thread ccy
Hello, I am the developer / package creator and accidentally made this entry: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xfreq-intel-git/ May you please remove it from the AUR Thank you CyrIng

Re: [aur-general] Delete package vinagre-spice

2014-06-21 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Saturday 21 June 2014 13:11:49 Muflone wrote: > The package vinagre-spice [1] is outdated and useless as the SPICE > protocol is provided by the official package of vinagre [2] in the main > repo. > Please delete the vinagre-spice [1] package. Done, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Since

[aur-general] Delete package vinagre-spice

2014-06-21 Thread Muflone
The package vinagre-spice [1] is outdated and useless as the SPICE protocol is provided by the official package of vinagre [2] in the main repo. Please delete the vinagre-spice [1] package. Muflone [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vinagre-spice/ [2] https://projects.archlinux.org/svntog

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: lcov-cvs

2014-06-15 Thread Felix Yan
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 12:58:34 Niels Martignène wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lcov-cvs/ > > LCOV has both moved to git and released a new version, this > development package is now obsolete. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sign

[aur-general] Delete request: lcov-cvs

2014-06-15 Thread Niels Martignène
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lcov-cvs/ LCOV has both moved to git and released a new version, this development package is now obsolete. Niels Martignène (Koromix)

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: nc

2014-06-14 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Friday 13 June 2014 20:28:13 Jerome Leclanche wrote: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nc > > Dupe of gnu-netcat Done, thank you =) -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: T

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman

2014-06-14 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 9:02 AM, David Phillips wrote: > Oh, so Wakka was abandoned. I had assumed it was still running. I > might have a look at forking Wakka or something... anyway, that's > outside the scope of this thread, I'm no longer opposing deletion. > > On 14/06/2014, Doug Newgard wrot

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests for abandoned packages

2014-06-14 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Doug Newgard wrote: > Maintainer renamed package, but did not request removal: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rename-git/ > > Maintainer said it needed removed and abandoned it instead of requesting > that it be deleted: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman

2014-06-14 Thread David Phillips
Oh, so Wakka was abandoned. I had assumed it was still running. I might have a look at forking Wakka or something... anyway, that's outside the scope of this thread, I'm no longer opposing deletion. On 14/06/2014, Doug Newgard wrote: > On 2014-06-14 01:27, David Phillips wrote: >> I wonder if any

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman

2014-06-13 Thread Doug Newgard
On 2014-06-14 01:27, David Phillips wrote: I wonder if anyone's interested in getting it working again? If nobody else is willing, I'll adopt it. You're pretty much talking about forking it to do that. There are tarballs on Sourceforge, so it should be doable. You'd probably need to rename th

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman

2014-06-13 Thread David Phillips
Actually, in light of the information present at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman_GUI_Frontends I will retract my previous comment. Too many existing, working Gtk front-ends for me to bother with gtkpacman. On 14/06/2014, David Phillips wrote: > I wonder if anyone's interested in getti

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman

2014-06-13 Thread David Phillips
I wonder if anyone's interested in getting it working again? If nobody else is willing, I'll adopt it. On 14/06/2014, Doug Newgard wrote: > This one might be a bit controversial. > > gtkpacman hadn't been updated in over 6 years and hasn't functioned > since pacman 4.1 at least, possibly before.

[aur-general] Delete request: gtkpacman

2014-06-13 Thread Doug Newgard
This one might be a bit controversial. gtkpacman hadn't been updated in over 6 years and hasn't functioned since pacman 4.1 at least, possibly before. I think it's safe at this point to say that it's dead. Dead + non-functional = should be removed IMO. Yes, it was a popular package with over 3

[aur-general] Delete requests for abandoned packages

2014-06-13 Thread Doug Newgard
Maintainer renamed package, but did not request removal: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rename-git/ Maintainer said it needed removed and abandoned it instead of requesting that it be deleted: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/raspyplayer-git/ Maintainer renamed package, but did not reque

[aur-general] Delete request: nc

2014-06-13 Thread Jerome Leclanche
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nc Dupe of gnu-netcat J. Leclanche

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: quassel-mysql

2014-06-05 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
5 июня 2014 г. 1:42:05 GMT+03:00, Jerome Leclanche пишет: >https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quassel-mysql/ > >This has long been upstreamed. Done, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sirencelly yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

[aur-general] Delete request: quassel-mysql

2014-06-04 Thread Jerome Leclanche
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/quassel-mysql/ This has long been upstreamed. J. Leclanche

Re: [aur-general] Delete package from AUR

2014-06-04 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Wednesday 04 June 2014 13:21:56 Blackleg wrote: > I need to erase the linux-w110er-headers package from AUR repository. Done. Please provide links in the next time. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru

Re: [aur-general] delete request [vmware-modules]

2014-06-04 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Wednesday 04 June 2014 15:29:41 ellis wrote: > Can someone please delete vmware-modules [1] ? It's outdated and broken > on current kernels, with the functionality being provided by > vmware-patch[2]. Thanks Removed, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail:

[aur-general] delete request [vmware-modules]

2014-06-04 Thread ellis
Can someone please delete vmware-modules [1] ? It's outdated and broken on current kernels, with the functionality being provided by vmware-patch[2]. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vmware-modules/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vmware-patch/

[aur-general] Delete package from AUR

2014-06-04 Thread Blackleg
Hello. I need to erase the linux-w110er-headers package from AUR repository.

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: polkit-efl-authentication-agent-git

2014-06-03 Thread Felix Yan
On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 17:39:09 Doug Newgard wrote: > Please delete: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/polkit-efl-authentication-agent-git/ > > Upstream has renamed it to simply polkit-efl, so I have uploaded a new > PKGBUILD. There's nothing worth merging. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix

[aur-general] Delete request: polkit-efl-authentication-agent-git

2014-06-03 Thread Doug Newgard
Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/polkit-efl-authentication-agent-git/ Upstream has renamed it to simply polkit-efl, so I have uploaded a new PKGBUILD. There's nothing worth merging. Thanks Doug Newgard (Scimmia)

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: irssi-mouse

2014-06-03 Thread Felix Yan
On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 14:52:34 Moritz Lipp wrote: > Hello, > > The package irssi-mouse [1] can be safely removed since the patches are > outdated and in the meanwhile also offline. In addition there is a new > package irssi-script-mouse which brings the same functionality to the > current vers

[aur-general] Delete request: irssi-mouse

2014-06-03 Thread Moritz Lipp
Hello, The package irssi-mouse [1] can be safely removed since the patches are outdated and in the meanwhile also offline. In addition there is a new package irssi-script-mouse which brings the same functionality to the current version of irssi as a plugin. Thank you, Moritz [1] https://aur.arch

Re: [aur-general] delete mingw-w64-libpng-static

2014-06-03 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 10:23 PM, Никола Вукосављевић wrote: > Well, I guess it should be deleted then. Merged

Re: [aur-general] Delete jtopen-jt400-jdbc3 and jtopen-jt400-jdbc4 packages

2014-06-02 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, June 02, 2014 21:09:00 Muflone wrote: > Hi > > please delete the jtopen-jt400-jdbc3 [1] and jtopen-jt400-jdbc4 [2] > packages as the upstream author doesn't provide anymore separate jdbc > drivers for newer versions and the jtopen package is enough. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/pa

Re: [aur-general] delete mingw-w64-libpng-static

2014-06-02 Thread Никола Вукосављевић
@archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] delete mingw-w64-libpng-static On 2.6.2014 20:55, xantares 09 wrote: Hi, Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libpng-static/ as static libs are provided by mingw-w64-libpng xantares@archlinux:~$ pacman -Ql mingw-w64-libpng mingw-w64-libpng /usr

Re: [aur-general] delete mingw-w64-libpng-static

2014-06-02 Thread xantares 09
Hi, It builds with either, although zlib seems to be linked dinamically for both, so you have to specify -lz. For me the packages are identical, same patches, etc. xan. > Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:03:37 +0200 > From: hau...@gmx.com > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Subject: Re:

[aur-general] Delete jtopen-jt400-jdbc3 and jtopen-jt400-jdbc4 packages

2014-06-02 Thread Muflone
Hi please delete the jtopen-jt400-jdbc3 [1] and jtopen-jt400-jdbc4 [2] packages as the upstream author doesn't provide anymore separate jdbc drivers for newer versions and the jtopen package is enough. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jtopen-jt400-jdbc3/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pa

Re: [aur-general] delete mingw-w64-libpng-static

2014-06-02 Thread Никола Вукосављевић
On 2.6.2014 20:55, xantares 09 wrote: Hi, Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libpng-static/ as static libs are provided by mingw-w64-libpng xantares@archlinux:~$ pacman -Ql mingw-w64-libpng mingw-w64-libpng /usr/ mingw-w64-libpng /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/ ... mingw-w64-libp

[aur-general] delete mingw-w64-libpng-static

2014-06-02 Thread xantares 09
Hi, Please delete: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mingw-w64-libpng-static/ as static libs are provided by mingw-w64-libpng xantares@archlinux:~$ pacman -Ql mingw-w64-libpng mingw-w64-libpng /usr/ mingw-w64-libpng /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/ ... mingw-w64-libpng /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/lib/ ... mingw-

Re: [aur-general] delete request: split package merge

2014-06-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 at 09:19:15, Stefan Tatschner wrote: > Hi, > > yesterday I created new packages for my project pynote. Today I realized > that the new AUR 3.0 now has split package support. > > So please delete: > - pynote-docs [1] > - pynote-docs-git [2] > Both deleted. Thanks for reportin

Re: [aur-general] delete request: plaintable

2014-06-01 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Sun, 01 Jun 2014 at 09:39:23, Stefan Tatschner wrote: > I accidentally forgot the 'python-' prefix in my pkgbuild. So please > remove this one here [1]. I'm sorry for this inconvenience. > Deleted, thanks! > Thanks! > Stefan > > [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plaintable/ > >

[aur-general] delete request: plaintable

2014-06-01 Thread Stefan Tatschner
I accidentally forgot the 'python-' prefix in my pkgbuild. So please remove this one here [1]. I'm sorry for this inconvenience. Thanks! Stefan [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/plaintable/

[aur-general] delete request: split package merge

2014-06-01 Thread Stefan Tatschner
Hi, yesterday I created new packages for my project pynote. Today I realized that the new AUR 3.0 now has split package support. So please delete: - pynote-docs [1] - pynote-docs-git [2] I will resubmit them as split packages from pynote and pynote-git. Thanks! Stefan [1]: https://aur.archlin

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests for obsolete XWayland packages

2014-05-31 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Tim Jester-Pfadt wrote: > Hi, > > I think there might be a confusion regarding package [6]. > > For our regular desktops we need the XOrg server which comes as a binary in > /usr/bin/Xorg provided by the xorg-server package in [extra]. You get this > by setting --e

Re: [aur-general] Delete/merge request

2014-05-31 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Νῖκος Θεοδώρου wrote: > Hello. > > Could you please delete (or merge) > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-good-plugins/ > and > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-ugly-plugins/ , > so I can update the split packages > https

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: python2-ethumb

2014-05-31 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Doug Newgard wrote: > Python bindings for ethumb were finally merged into the python-efl tree. > This package has no more reason to exist. Nothing worth merging, so it just > needs deleted. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ethumb/ > > Thanks > Doug (

[aur-general] Delete request: python2-ethumb

2014-05-31 Thread Doug Newgard
Python bindings for ethumb were finally merged into the python-efl tree. This package has no more reason to exist. Nothing worth merging, so it just needs deleted. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ethumb/ Thanks Doug (Scimmia)

[aur-general] Delete/merge request

2014-05-30 Thread Νῖκος Θεοδώρου
Hello. Could you please delete (or merge) https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-good-plugins/ and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-ugly-plugins/ , so I can update the split packages https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-gstreamer0.10-good/ and https://aur.

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests for obsolete XWayland packages

2014-05-28 Thread Tim Jester-Pfadt
Hi, I think there might be a confusion regarding package [6]. For our regular desktops we need the XOrg server which comes as a binary in /usr/bin/Xorg provided by the xorg-server package in [extra]. You get this by setting --enable-xorg at compile time. Now for XWayland we have our own binary wh

Re: [aur-general] Delete requests for obsolete XWayland packages

2014-05-28 Thread Lukas Jirkovsky
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Tim Jester-Pfadt wrote: > Hello, > > now that XWayland changed to being it's own server binary, rather than a > module for X11, there are several obsolete drivers on the AUR which only > create confusion.[1][2][3] The new XWayland doesn't need patched drivers > any

[aur-general] Delete requests for obsolete XWayland packages

2014-05-28 Thread Tim Jester-Pfadt
Hello, now that XWayland changed to being it's own server binary, rather than a module for X11, there are several obsolete drivers on the AUR which only create confusion.[1][2][3] The new XWayland doesn't need patched drivers anymore. "In the old model, things like modesetting were done in the vi

Re: [aur-general] delete request - fwts-efi-runtime-dkms

2014-05-27 Thread Lukas Fleischer
On Tue, 27 May 2014 at 22:11:55, Mariusz Libera wrote: > Hi, > please delete fwts-efi-runtime-dkms - > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fwts-efi-runtime-dkms/ > I'm maintainer of this package and I want to make it a split of fwts - > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fwts/ Deleted, thanks! > T

[aur-general] delete request - fwts-efi-runtime-dkms

2014-05-27 Thread Mariusz Libera
Hi, please delete fwts-efi-runtime-dkms - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fwts-efi-runtime-dkms/ I'm maintainer of this package and I want to make it a split of fwts - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fwts/ Thanks, Mariusz Libera

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: elementary_test-git

2014-05-27 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, May 26, 2014 12:35:50 Doug Newgard wrote: > This package was created when I uploaded a source package for > elementary-git created with mkaurball. It should not exist, as it's > created by elementary-git as a split package. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elementary_test-git/ Re

[aur-general] Delete request: elementary_test-git

2014-05-26 Thread Doug Newgard
This package was created when I uploaded a source package for elementary-git created with mkaurball. It should not exist, as it's created by elementary-git as a split package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/elementary_test-git/

Re: [aur-general] Delete vim-notmuch

2014-05-22 Thread Connor Behan
On 22/05/14 07:33 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Hi, > > I packaged this plug-in as a standalon vim plug-in, however, nowadays > it's bundled with the official 'notmuch-vim' package already. > > In theory I could update the package for the people that want to have > the latest and greatest version w

[aur-general] Delete vim-notmuch

2014-05-22 Thread Felipe Contreras
Hi, I packaged this plug-in as a standalon vim plug-in, however, nowadays it's bundled with the official 'notmuch-vim' package already. In theory I could update the package for the people that want to have the latest and greatest version without having to wait for a notmuch release. However, thos

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

2014-05-20 Thread Felix Yan
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 10:17:55 Xavier Corredor Llano wrote: > On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:17:18 AM Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: > > On Monday 19 May 2014 23:31:11 Xavier Corredor Llano wrote: > > > please delete [pynio]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pynio/ > > > > > > because was replaced by:

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

2014-05-20 Thread Xavier Corredor Llano
On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:17:18 AM Evgeniy Alekseev wrote: > On Monday 19 May 2014 23:31:11 Xavier Corredor Llano wrote: > > please delete [pynio]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pynio/ > > > > because was replaced by: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pynio/ > > Pyngl depends on p

Re: [aur-general] Delete request

2014-05-20 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Monday 19 May 2014 23:31:11 Xavier Corredor Llano wrote: > please delete [pynio]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pynio/ > > because was replaced by: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pynio/ Pyngl depends on pynio. Please update it first and then we will merge pynio into python2-p

[aur-general] Delete request

2014-05-19 Thread Xavier Corredor Llano
Hi please delete [pynio]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pynio/ because was replaced by: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pynio/ thanks -- Xavier Corredor Llano

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request

2014-05-18 Thread Evgeniy Alekseev
On Sunday 18 May 2014 10:34:28 Micael wrote: > Please delete "imdbpy-git", I created "imdbpy-hg" which is the proper name. imdbpy-git had one vote, so I have merged it into imdbpy-hg. And please provide links in the next time. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: dar

[aur-general] Delete Request

2014-05-18 Thread Micael
Please delete "imdbpy-git", I created "imdbpy-hg" which is the proper name.

Re: [aur-general] Delete request yaourt-abs

2014-05-17 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak wrote: > Please remove the yaourt-abs package: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yaourt-abs/ > > I forked original yaourt to use abs long time ago, when it had issues with > accesing packages source code for rebuilding via yaourt -Sb. Aft

Re: [aur-general] Delete request for kde-servicemenus-dropbox-simple

2014-05-17 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak wrote: > Hi, > > Can you please delete kde-servicemenus-dropbox-simple package: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-servicemenus-dropbox-simple/ > > Reason for deletion: package is not updated for a long time and actually > included int

Re: [aur-general] Delete request for skype-mid

2014-05-17 Thread Maxime Gauduin
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak wrote: > Please remove skype-mid package: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/skype-mid/ > > Long time ago it was separate experimental version of skype for MID > devices, but it is orphaned by Skype for a long time and is not working on >

[aur-general] Delete request for skype-mid

2014-05-17 Thread Aliaksandr Stelmachonak
Please remove skype-mid package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/skype-mid/ Long time ago it was separate experimental version of skype for MID devices, but it is orphaned by Skype for a long time and is not working on current Arch. I don't think there is any sense to keep it in AUR. Thanks,

[aur-general] Delete request for kde-servicemenus-dropbox-simple

2014-05-17 Thread Aliaksandr Stelmachonak
Hi, Can you please delete kde-servicemenus-dropbox-simple package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-servicemenus-dropbox-simple/ Reason for deletion: package is not updated for a long time and actually included into more functional package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-servicemenus

[aur-general] Delete request yaourt-abs

2014-05-17 Thread Aliaksandr Stelmachonak
Please remove the yaourt-abs package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yaourt-abs/ I forked original yaourt to use abs long time ago, when it had issues with accesing packages source code for rebuilding via yaourt -Sb. After yaourt fixed the issue, it is not under development anymore and do not

Re: [aur-general] Delete Request

2014-05-12 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, May 12, 2014 21:36:21 John D Jones III wrote: > Please delete the package > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-class-xsaccessor-array/ > > as the module it provided is now provided by > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-class-xsaccessor/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Feli

[aur-general] Delete Request

2014-05-12 Thread John D Jones III
Please delete the package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-class-xsaccessor-array/ as the module it provided is now provided by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-class-xsaccessor/ -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover unixgeek1...@gmail.com jnbek1...@gmail.com http:

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fontmatrix-svn

2014-05-12 Thread Xyne
On 2014-05-12 21:51 +0200 Stefan Husmann wrote: >Sorry, I accidently uploaded fontmatrix-svn again. Please delete it again. > >Best Regards, Stefan I'm not even going to ask. deleted again

Re: [aur-general] Delete request: fontmatrix-svn

2014-05-12 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 01.04.2014 09:51, schrieb Maxime Gauduin: On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Jerome Leclanche wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fontmatrix-svn/ - they are available on github.com/fontmatrix/fontmatrix now. J. Leclanche I've submitted a fixed/updated fontmatrix-git and merged fontma

Re: [aur-general] delete psp-pspirkeyb

2014-05-12 Thread xantares 09
> From: felixonm...@gmail.com > To: aur-general@archlinux.org > Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 01:31:48 +0800 > Subject: Re: [aur-general] delete psp-pspirkeyb > > On Monday, May 12, 2014 17:26:40 xantares 09 wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Please detele my p

Re: [aur-general] delete psp-pspgl

2014-05-12 Thread Felix Yan
On Monday, May 12, 2014 17:35:22 xantares 09 wrote: > hello, > please delete psp-pspgl (replaced by psp-opengl) : > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/psp-pspgl/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >