Den 24-12-2013 16:17, Armin K. skrev:
> The directories belong to the packages I'm trying to replace, but I am
> trying to replace the directories with a symlinks. Is this allowed?
There's been some discussion about this. I've taken to simple use
/usr/share/licenses/foo/ for installing foo-vcs pac
Ah. I'm sorry if I've misunderstood your questions.
--Jeremy
On 12/24/2013 06:48 PM, Jeremy Audet wrote:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pkgbuild#license> mesa-git and other
> -git packages built from same source
>> *should* replace packages from [extra] as they provide *everything*
>> packages from [extra] do (*exactly* the same files/directories/etc
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pkgbuild#license> mesa-git and other
-git packages built from same source
> *should* replace packages from [extra] as they provide *everything*
> packages from [extra] do (*exactly* the same files/directories/etc)
The licenses installed in `/usr/share/licenses/
On 12/24/2013 05:29 PM, Jeremy Audet wrote:
>> I am trying to create a git package, which provides the non-git packages
>
> If one package provides another, only one of the two packages may be
> installed.
>
>> :: mesa-git and mesa are in conflict. Remove mesa? [y/N] y
>
> Pacman is reminding y
> from a non-existent package (mesa-git)
Whoops. That should read "from a non-existent package (mesa)".
> I am trying to create a git package, which provides the non-git packages
If one package provides another, only one of the two packages may be
installed.
> :: mesa-git and mesa are in conflict. Remove mesa? [y/N] y
Pacman is reminding you that only one of the two packages may be installed.
>
Hello, I am trying to create a git package, which provides the non-git
packages from [extra], in this case mesa-git.
I've decided to symlink /usr/share/licenses/mesa to
/usr/share/licenses/mesa-git because the latter package provides the
former, and I wanted to use same license in lib32-mesa-git p
