On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 01:29:44AM +0200, Marcel Korpel wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> > All the other arch packages? Really?
> >
> > $ pacman -Ssq | grep -Ec '[^-][0-9]+$'
> > 322
>
> This is not a *completely* fair search, as this resultset also
> includes bin8
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Dave Reisner wrote:
> All the other arch packages? Really?
>
> $ pacman -Ssq | grep -Ec '[^-][0-9]+$'
> 322
This is not a *completely* fair search, as this resultset also
includes bin86, libx264, xf86-video-i740 and v8, where the number
parts are not indicating v
2014-09-23 17:39 GMT-03:00 Dave Reisner :
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 05:22:52PM -0300, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
> > 2014-09-23 13:13 GMT-03:00 Marcel Korpel :
> >
> > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Det wrote:
> > > > Enough of that already. Why I chose the "java-8-jdk" naming comes
> from
>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 05:22:52PM -0300, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
> 2014-09-23 13:13 GMT-03:00 Marcel Korpel :
>
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Det wrote:
> > > Enough of that already. Why I chose the "java-8-jdk" naming comes from
> > the
> > > fact that "java-8-openjdk" sounds like we'
2014-09-23 13:13 GMT-03:00 Marcel Korpel :
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Det wrote:
> > Enough of that already. Why I chose the "java-8-jdk" naming comes from
> the
> > fact that "java-8-openjdk" sounds like we're trying to do "java- > version>-". The project name of JDK is not "Oracle JDK",
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Det wrote:
> Enough of that already. Why I chose the "java-8-jdk" naming comes from the
> fact that "java-8-openjdk" sounds like we're trying to do "java- version>-". The project name of JDK is not "Oracle JDK", and
> that's why I chose it. Now, OpenJDK apparently
2014-09-21 0:27 GMT-03:00 Kevin Ott :
> On Saturday, September 20, 2014 10:19:52 PM Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
> > If you know how not topposting using gmail please that will help me, and
> as
> > I stated I use gmail.
> >
>
> It's actually pretty easy, although a bit more involved than it should
On Saturday, September 20, 2014 10:19:52 PM Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
> If you know how not topposting using gmail please that will help me, and as
> I stated I use gmail.
>
It's actually pretty easy, although a bit more involved than it should be. When
you hit reply you'll notice that at the b
If you know how not topposting using gmail please that will help me, and as
I stated I use gmail.
and what part ou not underestand?
All the official packagen in the official repos that append a version they
append it as --- and NOT as is now for
jre/jdk(7,6)
2014-09-19 22:46 GMT-03:00 Det :
> O
On Fri Sep 19 00:02:27 EDT 2014, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
> but upstream name not necesary mean the name that the encapsulate that
> contain the package need to be named.
>
> There ar a handfull either throw arch and aur history and actual named
> packages that not follow the name.
>
> but too l
but upstream name not necesary mean the name that the encapsulate that
contain the package need to be named.
There ar a handfull either throw arch and aur history and actual named
packages that not follow the name.
but too looking to the other packages in aur the version is alwas separate
from th
On Thu Sep 11 14:02:41 EDT 2014, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
> If look to the pther packages (not java) the fewers who need a version
they
> apend the versión at the endm so for consistency whit the all others
> packages I think is better keep the version at the end:
> --: oracle/openjdk-jre-7/8
We
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 08:13:11AM +1000, Justin Dray wrote:
> ...
Perhaps you could read over this before you post again:
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-August/029294.html
Cheers,
d
The fact that one naming convention or the other being chosen is still not
the issue, it's the fact that in the interim there are *both* packages in
there. There should only be duplicates of the same package for as long as
it takes for a merge request to be processed. This is clearly not the case,
If look to the pther packages (not java) the fewers who need a version they
apend the versión at the endm so for consistency whit the all others
packages I think is better keep the version at the end:
--: oracle/openjdk-jre-7/8
2014-09-11 13:41 GMT-03:00 Det :
> More input.
>
> On 09/09/14 23:08,
More input.
On 09/09/14 23:08, Justin Dray wrote:
> Part of the issue here however is that now there are both jre7 and
> jre7-oracle and so on duplicate packages in the AUR.
Yes, but why are you bringing that up as an "issue", as we are trying to
decide exactly which one to keep before just remov
On 10/09/14 00:20, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes wrote:
First of all, I really *really* urge you to stop using phrases like
"refusal"
Refusal is what happend when two or more not agree in something I never
mention who is refusing who cause both side from the vewpoint of the other
is refusing the other si
2014-09-09 23:22 GMT-03:00 Det :
>
> Enough of that already. Why I chose the "java-8-jdk" naming comes from the
> fact that "java-8-openjdk" sounds like we're trying to do "java- version>-". The project name of JDK is not "Oracle JDK", and
> that's why I chose it. Now, OpenJDK apparently still call
>First of all, I really *really* urge you to stop using phrases like
"refusal"
Refusal is what happend when two or more not agree in something I never
mention who is refusing who cause both side from the vewpoint of the other
is refusing the other side of view.
>In fact, _nowhere_ do I see anybody
Part of the issue here however is that now there are both jre7 and
jre7-oracle and so on duplicate packages in the AUR. If someone says 'oh, i
need oracle jdk, I can search on the AUR for that.' Well now they have to
go and read all of the comments and look around on the wiki/mailing
lists/forums t
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Pablo Lezaeta Reyes
wrote:
> Since the new java-common come to the repo Is now possible have multiple
> java, but this bring and open another issue, java naming scheme the
guy in
> jre/jdk[1] and jre-devel and jdk-devel refuse to follow a convention non
> gener
Agreed, someone complained on one of my java packages that it was using the
incorrect path for oracle java from the aur, and upon inspection I noticed
these multiple packages providing the same thing, none of which work as
they should be. I assumed they would have fixed it since that was only a
sho
Since the new java-common come to the repo Is now possible have multiple
java, but this bring and open another issue, java naming scheme the guy in
jre/jdk[1] and jre-devel and jdk-devel refuse to follow a convention non
generic name and the other maintaining jre7/jdk7 [2] and
jre7-oracle/jdk7-orac
It make sense... As soon as I installed jdk7 (replacing jre7), it compiled
just fine. Thanks Nowaker and Antonio Rojas
2014-04-23 13:58 GMT-03:00 Antonio Rojas :
> Rafael Ferreira wrote:
>
> > Hi there.
> >
> > Sudokuki has 'java-runtime' [1] as dependency and I have 'jre7' [2] (from
> > AUR)
Rafael Ferreira wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> Sudokuki has 'java-runtime' [1] as dependency and I have 'jre7' [2] (from
> AUR) installed (which 'provides' java-runtime=7)... When I try to compile
> sudokuki, makepkg warns me:
>
> :: jre7-openjdk and jre7 are in conflict (java-runtime). Remove jre7?
>
:: jre7-openjdk and jre7 are in conflict (java-runtime). Remove jre7? [y/N]
JRE != JDK. You need JDK7 to compile Java software.
makedepends=('java-environment')
And it tries to install OpenJDK for you, but it conflicts with your JRE.
Install Oracle JDK if you don't want OpenJDK.
https://a
Hi there.
Sudokuki has 'java-runtime' [1] as dependency and I have 'jre7' [2] (from
AUR) installed (which 'provides' java-runtime=7)... When I try to compile
sudokuki, makepkg warns me:
:: jre7-openjdk and jre7 are in conflict (java-runtime). Remove jre7? [y/N]
I don't want to install jre7-open
Am Fri, 6 Nov 2009 02:01:36 -0500
schrieb Eric Bélanger :
> Yes, these problems should be reported upstream to openjdk6 and/or
> jgnash.
>
> If you change the depends to java-runtime, it might be a good idea to
> display a warning via a post-upgrade message that there might be
> problems with ope
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:45:06 -0500
> schrieb Eric Bélanger :
>
>> >> In this case, make it depends on jre. You could put a note in the
>> >> PKGBUILD to explain this dependency.
>
> Btw., putting a note about a restricted dependency in the PKGBU
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:29:49 -0500
> schrieb Eric Bélanger :
>
>> > I know that no other packages depend on jre directly, and the
>> > prefered method is now java-runtime, but doesn't that mean that
>> > openjdk6 users will just have this softwar
Am Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:45:06 -0500
schrieb Eric Bélanger :
> >> In this case, make it depends on jre. You could put a note in the
> >> PKGBUILD to explain this dependency.
Btw., putting a note about a restricted dependency in the PKGBUILD is
not the recommended way because the average user doesn'
Am Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:29:49 -0500
schrieb Eric Bélanger :
> > I know that no other packages depend on jre directly, and the
> > prefered method is now java-runtime, but doesn't that mean that
> > openjdk6 users will just have this software silently fail?
>
> In this case, make it depends on jre.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:35 AM, doorknob60 wrote:
> Here's how I installed my chroot, it works very well (I don't even use any
> lib32 or bin32 packages anymore, just this):
> http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_Install_bundled_32bit_system
>
Or you can use the official mkarchroot tool:
h
Here's how I installed my chroot, it works very well (I don't even use any
lib32 or bin32 packages anymore, just this):
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch64_Install_bundled_32bit_system
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Eric Bélanger wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Aaron Schaefer
>
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Aaron Schaefer wrote:
> So, my new machine is up and running (and I figured out my previous
> packaging issues!)...so I'm updating my jGnash package
> (http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/jgnash/) to the
> latest release and there is also currently a bu
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Aaron Schaefer wrote:
> So, my new machine is up and running (and I figured out my previous
> packaging issues!)...so I'm updating my jGnash package
> (http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/jgnash/) to the
> latest release and there is also currently a b
So, my new machine is up and running (and I figured out my previous
packaging issues!)...so I'm updating my jGnash package
(http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/jgnash/) to the
latest release and there is also currently a bug report on the package
(http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16665).
Le Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:20:26 +0200,
Laszlo Papp a écrit :
> In last case, you can take these near the package, like other people
> do it with patches, install files.
>
> Thorp, No Pardon :)
>
> Best Regards,
> Laszlo Papp
>
Thanks Laszlo, that's probably what i'll do.However there is another
Excerpts from edogawaconan's message of Tue Jul 21 10:19:44 -0400 2009:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> > Excerpts from Loui Chang's message of Mon Jul 20 17:30:47 -0400 2009:
> >> On Tue 21 Jul 2009 01:03 +0400, svoufff wrote:
> >> > yes the jsampler release version contai
In last case, you can take these near the package, like other people do it
with patches, install files.
Thorp, No Pardon :)
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Andrei Thorp wrote:
> Excerpts from Loui Chang's message of Mon Jul 20 17:30:47 -0400 2009:
>> On Tue 21 Jul 2009 01:03 +0400, svoufff wrote:
>> > yes the jsampler release version contains them but not jsampler from
>> > cvs.
>> >
>> > Le Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:56:55 +
Excerpts from Loui Chang's message of Mon Jul 20 17:30:47 -0400 2009:
> On Tue 21 Jul 2009 01:03 +0400, svoufff wrote:
> > yes the jsampler release version contains them but not jsampler from
> > cvs.
> >
> > Le Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:56:55 +,
> > Laszlo Papp a écrit :
> >
> > > Is there any pa
On Tue 21 Jul 2009 01:03 +0400, svoufff wrote:
> yes the jsampler release version contains them but not jsampler from
> cvs.
>
> Le Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:56:55 +,
> Laszlo Papp a écrit :
>
> > Is there any package/program which contains this files ?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Laszlo Papp
> >
yes the jsampler release version contains them but not jsampler from
cvs.
Le Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:56:55 +,
Laszlo Papp a écrit :
> Is there any package/program which contains this files ?
>
> Best Regards,
> Laszlo Papp
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:51 PM, svoufff wrote:
>
> > Hi, i'm
Is there any package/program which contains this files ?
Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:51 PM, svoufff wrote:
> Hi, i'm working on a PKGBUILD for jsampler-cvs.This is a java frontend
> to Linuxsampler.
> This app requires 4 more java libraries to be present at build time i
Hi, i'm working on a PKGBUILD for jsampler-cvs.This is a java frontend
to Linuxsampler.
This app requires 4 more java libraries to be present at build time in a
subdir of the source.These are jlscp.jar, juife.jar, swingx.jar
and substance.jar.All of these are only needed for build, I ran the
progra
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 18:09, nathan owe. wrote:
> nathan owe. wrote:
>>
>> this is confusing we need a easier PKGBUILD example for java. here is my
>> pkgbuild so far:
>>
>> /# Contributor: Nathan Owe
>> pkgname=jpartialdownloader
>> pkgver=1.9
>> pkgrel=1
>> pkgdesc=""
>> arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
nathan owe. wrote:
this is confusing we need a easier PKGBUILD example for java. here is
my pkgbuild so far:
/# Contributor: Nathan Owe
pkgname=jpartialdownloader
pkgver=1.9
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc=""
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url=""
license=('GPL')
groups=()
depends=('openjdk6')
makedepends=('openjdk6'
this is confusing we need a easier PKGBUILD example for java. here is my
pkgbuild so far:
/# Contributor: Nathan Owe
pkgname=jpartialdownloader
pkgver=1.9
pkgrel=1
pkgdesc=""
arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
url=""
license=('GPL')
groups=()
depends=('openjdk6')
makedepends=('openjdk6')
source=(http://dow
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:12 AM, nathan owe. wrote:
> i am trying to find an example java build on arch wiki, also been looking at
> the forums. is there no example pkgbuild that i can copy and put in
> /usr/share/pacman/
>
this might help: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Java_Package_Guidelin
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 02:12, nathan owe. wrote:
> i am trying to find an example java build on arch wiki, also been looking at
> the forums. is there no example pkgbuild that i can copy and put in
> /usr/share/pacman/
>
I'd recommend looking around the AUR for good examples (Personally I
think m
nathan owe. schrieb:
i am trying to find an example java build on arch wiki, also been
looking at the forums. is there no example pkgbuild that i can copy and
put in /usr/share/pacman/
Hello,
I do not think it is typical but if you want to see a java package witch
uses a buildsystem and w
Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:28 AM, nathan owe. wrote:
Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:20 AM, nathan owe. wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
nathan owe. wrote:
i am trying to find an example java build on arch wiki, also bee
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:28 AM, nathan owe. wrote:
> Ronald van Haren wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:20 AM, nathan owe. wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
nathan owe. wrote:
>
> i am trying to find an example java build on arch wiki, also been
> looking
>>>
Ronald van Haren wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:20 AM, nathan owe. wrote:
Allan McRae wrote:
nathan owe. wrote:
i am trying to find an example java build on arch wiki, also been looking
at the forums. is there no example pkgbuild that i can copy and put in
/usr/share/pacman/
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Ronald van Haren wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:20 AM, nathan owe. wrote:
>> Allan McRae wrote:
>>>
>>> nathan owe. wrote:
i am trying to find an example java build on arch wiki, also been looking
at the forums. is there no example pkgbuild that i
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 8:20 AM, nathan owe. wrote:
> Allan McRae wrote:
>>
>> nathan owe. wrote:
>>>
>>> i am trying to find an example java build on arch wiki, also been looking
>>> at the forums. is there no example pkgbuild that i can copy and put in
>>> /usr/share/pacman/
>>
>> There is none t
Allan McRae wrote:
nathan owe. wrote:
i am trying to find an example java build on arch wiki, also been
looking at the forums. is there no example pkgbuild that i can copy
and put in /usr/share/pacman/
There is none that I know of. Most java packages just dump all their
files in /usr/share
nathan owe. wrote:
i am trying to find an example java build on arch wiki, also been
looking at the forums. is there no example pkgbuild that i can copy
and put in /usr/share/pacman/
There is none that I know of. Most java packages just dump all their
files in /usr/share/java/${pkgname}/ an
i am trying to find an example java build on arch wiki, also been
looking at the forums. is there no example pkgbuild that i can copy and
put in /usr/share/pacman/
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 05:47:16PM +0100, solsTiCe d'Hiver wrote:
> using java-runtime as dependancy makes pacman install java-gcj-compat
> wihc seems to broke most of the packages.
>
> so before using java-runtime as dependancy one need to get rid off
> java-gcj-compat ? no ?
>
http://bugs.arch
using java-runtime as dependancy makes pacman install java-gcj-compat
wihc seems to broke most of the packages.
so before using java-runtime as dependancy one need to get rid off
java-gcj-compat ? no ?
Hi,
yes it is correct. It's just that the gcj one breaks stuff as it is
incompatible.
Vuze (formerly Azureus) in community has actually the same problem.
Works with jre, works with openjdk, doesn't work with gcj. Its site
claims that it should work though so maybe a little tweaking of the
s
2009/2/5 Ronald van Haren :
> 2009/2/5 Xavier :
>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Ondřej Kučera
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The "correct" dependencies now are the following two:
>>> - java-runtime - needed for applications written in Java
>>> - java-environment - needed for Java development and for applic
2009/2/5 Xavier :
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Ondřej Kučera
> wrote:
>>
>> The "correct" dependencies now are the following two:
>> - java-runtime - needed for applications written in Java
>> - java-environment - needed for Java development and for applications that
>> need to compile Java
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Ondřej Kučera wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Rorschach wrote:
>>
>> thanks Ronald van Haren and dejari for making this clear! I updated now
>> all my packages which require java: i2p, jondo and ipscan to depend on j2sdk
>> instead of openjdk6. I'm now going to add this to the
Hello,
Rorschach wrote:
thanks Ronald van Haren and dejari for making this clear! I updated now all my
packages which require java: i2p, jondo and ipscan to depend on j2sdk instead
of openjdk6. I'm now going to add this to the java packaging guidelines.
No, please don't do that. As far as I
thanks Ronald van Haren and dejari for making this clear! I updated now all my
packages which require java: i2p, jondo and ipscan to depend on j2sdk instead
of openjdk6. I'm now going to add this to the java packaging guidelines.
greetings
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Rorschach wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:22:26 +0100
> Ronald van Haren wrote:
>
>> in that case use j2sdk as suggested before.
>
> If I use j2sdk as dependencie what package gets installed by pacman if the
> user has no java already installed?
>
the first packa
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:22:26 +0100
Ronald van Haren wrote:
> in that case use j2sdk as suggested before.
If I use j2sdk as dependencie what package gets installed by pacman if the user
has no java already installed?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Rorschach wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:07:01 +0100
> Ronald van Haren wrote:
>> let it depend on java-environment. This is both provided by openjdk6
>> and the sun jdk package.
>>
>> Ronald
>
> What package gets installed then if the user has until now none of t
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:07:01 +0100
Ronald van Haren wrote:
> let it depend on java-environment. This is both provided by openjdk6
> and the sun jdk package.
>
> Ronald
What package gets installed then if the user has until now none of these
installed:
$ pacman -sS java-environment
extra/java-gc
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 11:57:34AM +0100, Leslie P. Polzer wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Rorschach has asked me to bring the discussion at
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2033
>
> to this mailing list.
>
> Please help us find a consensus.
>
>
> My answer to his last question
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Rorschach wrote:
> Is the provides field really doing what you think? Than I didn't understood
> it right. Could please someone bring some light to this?
>
> In general I think that Sun's Java should be kicked out as dependencie in
> every package where openjdk6
Is the provides field really doing what you think? Than I didn't understood it
right. Could please someone bring some light to this?
In general I think that Sun's Java should be kicked out as dependencie in every
package where openjdk6 works fine because I think the main goal should be that
we
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Leslie P. Polzer
wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> Rorschach has asked me to bring the discussion at
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2033
>
> to this mailing list.
>
> Please help us find a consensus.
>
>
> My answer to his last question is:
>
> ---
> Le
Hello everyone,
Rorschach has asked me to bring the discussion at
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=2033
to this mailing list.
Please help us find a consensus.
My answer to his last question is:
---
Let them install openjdk6 to provide the j2sdk dependency.
It's not the Arch philo
77 matches
Mail list logo
