2009/4/9 Daenyth Blank :
> Can you pull from my sqlite-bash branch? I have some cleanup fixes
> that will be easier to apply before proceeding, though the function is
> still pretty much the same,
>
Done.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 13:50, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote:
> 2009/4/9 Evangelos Foutras :
>> Couldn't we simply introduce a new column, store the filename there and
>> create an index on it?
>>
>
> That's a nice idea. I'll try out and see how much the db size increases.
> --
> Abhishek
>
Can you pull
2009/4/9 Evangelos Foutras :
> Couldn't we simply introduce a new column, store the filename there and
> create an index on it?
>
That's a nice idea. I'll try out and see how much the db size increases.
--
Abhishek
2009/4/9 Daenyth Blank :
> How is the filesize of the REPO.db? CMB was reporting that community
> was taking up more than 75mb with his version. Regardless of how the
> sqlite features would be implemented, I will also keep the flat file
> version available, and configurable. How are the searching
Chris Brannon wrote:
"select * from files where filename like '%/getmail'"
takes 5 seconds or so,
because it has to iterate through all the filenames in the table.
If sqlite were used for pkgfile, that second query would need to be quite
a bit faster than it is now.
-- Chris
Couldn't we si
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 13:40, Chris Brannon wrote:
> Daenyth Blank wrote:
>> How is the filesize of the REPO.db? CMB was reporting that community
>> was taking up more than 75mb with his version. Regardless of how the
>> sqlite features would be implemented, I will also keep the flat file
>> versi
Daenyth Blank wrote:
> How is the filesize of the REPO.db? CMB was reporting that community
> was taking up more than 75mb with his version. Regardless of how the
> sqlite features would be implemented, I will also keep the flat file
> version available, and configurable. How are the searching and
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 12:31, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote:
> 2009/4/9 Abhishek Dasgupta :
>> I made a sqlite-bash branch on github [1] with the create_db
>> function which I'm using right now. It's not incremental yet but
>> adding a separate table with package versions like you've done
>> would solve
2009/4/9 Abhishek Dasgupta :
> I made a sqlite-bash branch on github [1] with the create_db
> function which I'm using right now. It's not incremental yet but
> adding a separate table with package versions like you've done
> would solve the problem.
>
Just added incremental update support to sqli
2009/4/9 Chris Brannon :
> I made a fork of pkgtools on github.
> Have a look at the sqlite branch of http://github.com/CMB/pkgtools
> I wrote a script which incrementally updates an SQLite database from a
> REPO.files.tar.gz tarball. It is in pkgtools/other/repofile2db.py
> The code is terribly r
Abhishek Dasgupta wrote:
> The initial generation is taking really long! It's over two hours and still
> generating...
*SNIP*
> Also, there has to be some way of escaping the filename so that sqlite
> does not give errors like this:
> SQL error: near "N": syntax error
I made a fork of pkgtools on
Also, I forgot to mention that the size of the dbs is quite large
compared to the simple *files.tar.gz on ftp:
core.files.db.tar.gz 220K
core.db 2.1M
core.db has 35796 files. extra.db (still generating) is already at 13M!
--
Abhishek
2009/4/8 Daenyth Blank :
> That sounds promising... If we can find some method to construct only
> the differences, then it would be doable. Have a method for the user
> to do initial generation, update an existing db, and in addition, to
> download a database from a known source (I could generate
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 14:04, Abhishek Dasgupta wrote:
> 2009/4/5 Daenyth Blank :
>> That's not a bad idea, and it's one that's been recommended to me for
>> pkgfile as well. Is there a simple (read: bash-usable) interface I
>> could work with to speed up pkgfile?
>
> I was trying out the command
2009/4/5 Daenyth Blank :
> That's not a bad idea, and it's one that's been recommended to me for
> pkgfile as well. Is there a simple (read: bash-usable) interface I
> could work with to speed up pkgfile?
I was trying out the command line sqlite3 tool to manage a database
comprised of the followin
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 09:29, Chris Brannon wrote:
> Abhishek Dasgupta wrote:
>> Thanks for the useful script! But shouldn't this line:
>> known_files[entry] =3D (repo, package)
>> be
>> known_files[entry].append((repo, package))
>
> That is a nice suggestion! Using lists as hash
Abhishek Dasgupta wrote:
> Thanks for the useful script! But shouldn't this line:
> known_files[entry] =3D (repo, package)
> be
> known_files[entry].append((repo, package))
That is a nice suggestion! Using lists as hash values could make the tool
useful for purposes other than che
2009/4/5 Chris Brannon :
> I wrote this code in anger. Hopefully, others might find it useful.
> There is a little story behind it.
>
> I maintain the nmh package in unsupported. I just discovered that a
> package from extra provides /usr/bin/dp, which is also provided by nmh.
> We have this nice
I wrote this code in anger. Hopefully, others might find it useful.
There is a little story behind it.
I maintain the nmh package in unsupported. I just discovered that a
package from extra provides /usr/bin/dp, which is also provided by nmh.
We have this nice collection of files under /var/cach
19 matches
Mail list logo
