[aur-general] python-foo and python2-foo - should they conflict?

2012-10-16 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
Was just trying out some python packages and I realized I can't have both the python and python2 variants installed at the same time for python-networkx. Of course, there's conflicts with the license files and perhaps documentation, but other than that I wonder whether there's a use-case for

Re: [aur-general] python-foo and python2-foo - should they conflict?

2012-10-16 Thread Rashif Ray Rahman
On 16 October 2012 16:48, Oon-Ee Ng ngoonee.t...@gmail.com wrote: python-foo and python2-foo - should they conflict? Absolutely not. At least, ideally. I may work with both Python versions and in that case will need libraries for each. Shared files have been a problem, and so far the (painful)

Re: [aur-general] python-foo and python2-foo - should they conflict?

2012-10-16 Thread Oon-Ee Ng
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: As mentioned in the Arch Packaging Standards [1]: /usr/share/doc/{pkg}Application documentation You should rename the documentation folder of your packages to /usr/share/doc/$pkgname, so there would be not anymore