Re: [aur-general] python2-simpleparse replaces python-simpleparse / balazar removal

2010-12-15 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 15/12/10 13:45, Joao Cordeiro wrote: > It seems to me that having two packages (python-* and python2-*) would make > sense only if that package worked _both_ with python2 and python3. In this > particular case, where simpleparse works with python2 only, I don't > understand why we can't have it

Re: [aur-general] python2-simpleparse replaces python-simpleparse / balazar removal

2010-12-15 Thread Joao Cordeiro
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Martti Kühne wrote: > python-simpleparse [1] is not supporting python 3.x atm. I just > uploaded a package with correct naming. > > cheers > mar77i > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Martti Kühne

Re: [aur-general] python2-simpleparse replaces python-simpleparse / balazar removal

2010-12-15 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Martti Kühne wrote: > python-simpleparse [1] is not supporting python 3.x atm. I just > uploaded a package with correct naming. > balazar [2] depends on python 2.x, the project is abandoned and the > app segfaults just after the main menu, so the package can be > s

[aur-general] python2-simpleparse replaces python-simpleparse / balazar removal

2010-12-15 Thread Martti Kühne
python-simpleparse [1] is not supporting python 3.x atm. I just uploaded a package with correct naming. balazar [2] depends on python 2.x, the project is abandoned and the app segfaults just after the main menu, so the package can be scratched IMO. Guess my request was ignored last week after I men