On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Pier Luigi wrote:
> 2013/9/7 Jerome Leclanche :
>> One of the issues with Scarpino's packages is that they install in
>> /opt, which is fine by itself but means they cannot replace the
>> regular qt5 packages (I use the qt5-* packages I adopted to replace
>> the com
2013/9/7 Jerome Leclanche :
> One of the issues with Scarpino's packages is that they install in
> /opt, which is fine by itself but means they cannot replace the
> regular qt5 packages (I use the qt5-* packages I adopted to replace
> the community ones).
OK
> On naming, I don't know. The officia
On 2013-09-07 17:57, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> On naming, I don't know. The official names are, eg.
> "qtquickcontrols", and those are part of qt-project.org (official qt
> module). I like qt5-quickcontrols-*, but it probably makes more sense
> to go with qt5-qtquickcontrols-*. Simply qtquickcontro
One of the issues with Scarpino's packages is that they install in
/opt, which is fine by itself but means they cannot replace the
regular qt5 packages (I use the qt5-* packages I adopted to replace
the community ones).
On naming, I don't know. The official names are, eg.
"qtquickcontrols", and th
Just received a notice from AUR that Barthalion delete qtquickcontrols-git.
The package is needed by the hawaii packages and it was meant to
complete the qt from git packages series maintained by Andrea
Scarpino.
The real problem here is that we have two sets of packages for Qt 5
from git (qt5-*-
