On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 05:20:29AM +, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> When deletion requests were sent to this mailing list, it was expected
> to add the link, however, IIRC it changed 2 or more years ago.
>
> "[snip] requests can be created by clicking on the "Submit Request" link
> under "Package
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:35:57 -0400, beest wrote:
>I'd like to request removal for romextract.
When deletion requests were sent to this mailing list, it was expected
to add the link, however, IIRC it changed 2 or more years ago.
"[snip] requests can be created by clicking on the "Submit Request"
I'd like to request removal for romextract. I sorta became upstream
since it was easier at the time than patching and the source hadn't
been touched in years, but I zapped most of my GH projects long ago so
the source in the (orphaned) PKGBUILD is dead, and it's questionable
whether this belonged
Please remove gpsd-obsolet, i think its of no use anymore.
thanks
Stefan,
The preferred method of submitting removal requests is now through the AUR
web interface. Search for the File Request link.
— Jeremy 'Ichimonji10' Audet
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Andy Weidenbaum archb...@gmail.com wrote:
I added vim-colors-lettuce to replace vim-lettuce. The original vim-lettuce
package is now obsolete.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-lettuce/
Andy,
Please use the web interface to file a deletion request (on
I added vim-colors-lettuce to replace vim-lettuce. The original vim-lettuce
package is now obsolete.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-lettuce/
Hi,
osc-build-archlinux [1] should be deleted: it is outdated; more than
that, it is not needed anymore, since support for this feature is
included upstream now (see comments in the package). Anyway,
obs-build-git [2] is an up-to-date version of it.
[1]:
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 00:49:06 Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote:
osc-build-archlinux [1] should be deleted: it is outdated; more than
that, it is not needed anymore, since support for this feature is
included upstream now (see comments in the package). Anyway,
obs-build-git [2] is an up-to-date
Please delete the unmaintained eos-git package. The source github page is
down.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eos-git/
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 19:40:58 wrote:
Please delete the unmaintained eos-git package. The source github page is
down.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eos-git/
Removed, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Please remove spyder2-hg
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder2-hg/. It will become part of
split package spyder-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder-hg/.
On Monday 09 June 2014 09:29:28 Willem wrote:
Please remove spyder2-hg
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder2-hg/. It will become part of
split package spyder-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder-hg/.
Done, thank you.
--
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.
Hi,
I would like to request the following package be removed:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-xps13-docs/
It was a failed attempted a little while ago to upload my patched kernel to
the AUR and I have since read up on the AUR and submitted the package using
linux-ck as a guide.
Thanks,
On Sunday, June 08, 2014 19:21:35 Ross Williams wrote:
Hi,
I would like to request the following package be removed:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-xps13-docs/
It was a failed attempted a little while ago to upload my patched kernel to
the AUR and I have since read up on the AUR
On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 12:20:02 李胜明 wrote:
Hi,
Please remove the following pkgbuilds:
- 115backup-gtk2 [1];
- 115backup-gtk3 [2];
- airweibo [3];
- weiboair [4];
- xbmc-addon-repo-hdpfans [5];
I am the submitter of the 5 packages. The upstream of [1] [2] has renamed
them to
Hi,
Please remove the following pkgbuilds:
- 115backup-gtk2 [1];
- 115backup-gtk3 [2];
- airweibo [3];
- weiboair [4];
- xbmc-addon-repo-hdpfans [5];
I am the submitter of the 5 packages. The upstream of [1] [2] has renamed
them to 115wangpan. Package [3] and [4] are the same. Package [5] is
On Sunday, June 01, 2014 20:21:54 Charles Bos wrote:
Hello,
I think the following package ought to be removed:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hackedbox/
The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated since 2008 and neither the
upstream url nor the source link work.
The following
On Sunday, June 01, 2014 15:22:56 Ivaylo Kuzev wrote:
Hi,
The package [1] is out-of-date.
Please remove [1].
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nikola-zsh-completion/[1][1]
Removed, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
The package [1] is out-of-date.
Please remove [1].
[1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nikola-zsh-completion/[1][1]
--
Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo
Hello,
I think the following package ought to be removed:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hackedbox/
The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated since 2008 and neither the
upstream url nor the source link work.
The following website lists 0.8.5 as the latest release:
On Mon, 26 May 2014 13:29:32 -0600
Alexej Magura sickhadas@gmail.com wrote:
This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove
it-request.
package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001
package-url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/
I know that the package *even*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.5.2014 21:29, Alexej Magura wrote:
This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove
it-request.
package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001 package-url:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/
I know that the package
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.5.2014 21:47, Steven Honeyman wrote:
Not only that - it's yet another pointless package! All it does is
unzip 1 file...
How does the number of files in a package relate to its usefulness?
It's there for convenience, as are many other
This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove it-request.
package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001
package-url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/
I know that the package *even* states that it is illegal to use said
package without owning an actual playstation
Not only that - it's yet another pointless package! All it does is
unzip 1 file...
That's worse than firefox addon packages or desktop wallpapers.
On 26 May 2014 20:29, Alexej Magura sickhadas@gmail.com wrote:
This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove it-request.
Please remove the outdated mybb-polish [1] package. I have adopted and
updated the mybb AUR package. Language packs can be easily added like I
did here [2]. If somebody likes I can create a polish language pack
('mybb-lang-pl') as well.
Stefan
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mybb-polish/
Hi
Could a TU please remove glade3-gtk2 [1]?
It's a duplicate of glade-gtk2 [2].
Both packages were orphaned and I took ownership and updated the
glade-gtk2 [2] to the latest release.
Thank you
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade3-gtk2/
[2]
On Saturday, May 24, 2014 15:31:04 Stefan Tatschner wrote:
Please remove the outdated mybb-polish [1] package. I have adopted and
updated the mybb AUR package. Language packs can be easily added like I
did here [2]. If somebody likes I can create a polish language pack
('mybb-lang-pl') as
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.comwrote:
Hi
Could a TU please remove glade3-gtk2 [1]?
It's a duplicate of glade-gtk2 [2].
Both packages were orphaned and I took ownership and updated the
glade-gtk2 [2] to the latest release.
Thank you
[1]
Hi TUs,
Please remove my package talesofmajeyal [1]. It is a duplicate of
tome4[2], a package that I didn't notice until just now.
Thanks,
WorMzy
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/talesofmajeyal/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tome4/
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, WorMzy Tykashi wormzy.tyka...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi TUs,
Please remove my package talesofmajeyal [1]. It is a duplicate of
tome4[2], a package that I didn't notice until just now.
Thanks,
WorMzy
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/talesofmajeyal/
[2]
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfileaudiopreview-git/
Merged in kio-extras
Thanks
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 14:09:06 Antonio Rojas wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfileaudiopreview-git/
Merged in kio-extras
Removed, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 10:58:31 David Phillips wrote:
On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages
aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are
no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are
still using them instead
Ahh okay, thanks for clarifying that for me
On 10/05/2014, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 10:58:31 David Phillips wrote:
On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages
aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.infowrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-stable/
This is simply a duplicate of firefox in [extra].
Done, thx
--
Maxime
Hi!
The cantata package in [community] is now build with no kde dependencies so the
package I maintain is now superfluous. Please delete it from the AUR.
Thanks!
Spyros
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 02:48:48 Spyros Stathopoulos wrote:
The cantata package in [community] is now build with no kde dependencies so
the package I maintain is now superfluous. Please delete it from the AUR.
Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages
aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are
no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are
still using them instead of systemd?
On 09/05/2014, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-stable/
This is simply a duplicate of firefox in [extra].
Hi,
Just stumbled upon this[1] package, it is very old (last updated in
2009) and useful only when Arch used to have RC init scripts.
I'd suggest its removal.
Also, I think there are still a number of packages related to old
initscripts. Do you mind if every time we find one, we request its
Please remove glm-0.9.4 [1] and glm094 [2] as both are orphan and
unneeded/obsolete.
small explanation:
vertoe (the submitter) meant to use it as a dependency for some other
package he is working on. I contacted him and discussed the problems
involved in having a static version of glm as
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 15:27:00 Levente Polyak wrote:
Please remove glm-0.9.4 [1] and glm094 [2] as both are orphan and
unneeded/obsolete.
small explanation:
vertoe (the submitter) meant to use it as a dependency for some other
package he is working on. I contacted him and discussed
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde-
runtime-git
kde-runtime is dead, long live kde-runtime
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 14:47:48 A Rojas wrote:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde- runtime-git
kde-runtime is dead, long live kde-runtime
Removed, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 22 April 2014 20:00:57 Roel Blaauwgeers wrote:
Hello,
The package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/netdiscover-patched/ should
be
removed as it is a duplicate of 'netdiscover'.
The package has been removed, thank you =)
--
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.
Hi,
Can the following package be deleted please:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libnautilus-extension-ubuntu/
I originally uploaded it because the AUR doesn't yet support split
packages but it doesn't really make sense to compile the whole of
nautilus twice and then throw most of it
On Monday, April 21, 2014 14:49:17 Charles Bos wrote:
Hi,
Can the following package be deleted please:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libnautilus-extension-ubuntu/
I originally uploaded it because the AUR doesn't yet support split
packages but it doesn't really make sense to compile
On Sunday, April 13, 2014 16:17:18 willemw wrote:
Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pywapi/ and please move
the votes to the renamed package
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pywapi/.
Merged, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
This package has been renamed upstream to python2-bitcoin.
On Thursday 10 April 2014 18:28:23 Andy Weidenbaum wrote:
This package has been renamed upstream to python2-bitcoin.
Done. Please provide links in the next time.
--
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.
e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru
ICQ: 407-398-235
Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru
Replaced with kdelibs4support-git
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde4support-git/
Thanks
I propose that
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf-deb/
should be deleted as
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf/
replaces it
and that
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-messaging-deb/
should be deleted as
On Monday, April 07, 2014 11:02:14 James Bulmer wrote:
I propose that
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf-deb/
should be deleted as
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf/
replaces it
and that
Could
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient-deb/
be removed as I have moved all of the dependency's to
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient/
Thanks
On Monday, April 07, 2014 11:25:19 James Bulmer wrote:
Could
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient-deb/
be removed as I have moved all of the dependency's to
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient/
Thanks
Removed, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
Hello,
please remove tntdb-svn [1] from AUR as it's source has moved to GitHub
(see [2])
Thanks,
Jonas Platte
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tntdb-svn/
[2] http://www.tntnet.org/development.html
On 5 April 2014 15:22, Jonas Platte jonaspla...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
please remove tntdb-svn [1] from AUR as it's source has moved to GitHub (see
[2])
Thanks,
Jonas Platte
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tntdb-svn/
[2] http://www.tntnet.org/development.html
Removed, thanks.
On Saturday 05 April 2014 18:10:02 sehraf wrote:
please remove linux-sun7i [1] and sunxi-tools [2] because:
- both are outdated and orphaned
- linux-sun7i is provided by Arch Linux ARM [3]
- sunxi-tools is a duplication of sunxi-tools-git [4]
I've removed linux-sun7i and have merged
Hi TUs,
Please could you remove the following packages:
redirfs-bin [1] and redirfs-lib [2]. Neither have been updated since
2009, and both have no maintainer, any votes, and depend a
non-existent redirfs-modules package.
Cheers,
WorMzy
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-bin/
[2]
On Saturday, April 05, 2014 00:53:11 WorMzy Tykashi wrote:
Hi TUs,
Please could you remove the following packages:
redirfs-bin [1] and redirfs-lib [2]. Neither have been updated since
2009, and both have no maintainer, any votes, and depend a
non-existent redirfs-modules package.
Hi,
The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2].
Please remove [1].
[1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-xft/[1]
[2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-git/[2]
--
Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo
On 03/04/14 12:46 PM, Ivaylo Kuzev wrote:
Hi,
The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2].
Please remove [1].
[1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-xft/[1]
[2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-git/[2]
--
Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo
Merged [1] into [2],
Hi, everyone.
I hope the package stm32flash-svn in AUR can be removed.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stm32flash-svn/
The package was orphan, and I adopted it. but now, I have made two new
packages (stm32flash-git and stm32flash) to replace it. So, it's
unnecessary to keep stm32flash-svn in
On Tuesday, April 01, 2014 00:53:37 Stephen Zhang wrote:
Hi, everyone.
I hope the package stm32flash-svn in AUR can be removed.
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stm32flash-svn/
The package was orphan, and I adopted it. but now, I have made two new
packages (stm32flash-git and
Please remove i3-py-git. It has been replaced by python-i3-git and
python2-i3-git.
Willem
On Sunday, March 30, 2014 10:18:19 willemw wrote:
Please remove i3-py-git. It has been replaced by python-i3-git and
python2-i3-git.
Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 27 March 2014 12:15:10 Janne Haapsaari wrote:
The package sublime-text-3 [1] is a duplicate of sublime-text-dev [2]
package. Please remove the former.
The package has only one vote, so I've removed it.
--
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.
e-mail:
Hi,
The package sublime-text-3 [1] is a duplicate of sublime-text-dev [2]
package. Please remove the former.
1. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-3/
2. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sublime-text-dev/
Thanks!
Janne
Can the following package be removed:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/compiz-pure/
It's supposed to provide Compiz 0.8 plus the gtk-window-decorator. The
package is orphaned, hasn't been updated in nearly 4 years, is several
versions out of date and doesn't build successfully.
Nothing
The following Packages should be removed:
1: loudness-cli-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-cli-git/
2: libebur128-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-git/
3: libebur128-nu774-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-nu774-git/
1 and 2 are orphaned, I am the
Hi,
My bad, package hubicfuse has to be removed (correct package is
hubicfuse-git). Feel free to test the package, but I think I added
all deps
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Robert Mackanics schnoo...@gmail.comwrote:
The following Packages should be removed:
1: loudness-cli-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-cli-git/
2: libebur128-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-git/
3: libebur128-nu774-git
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Mitsu archli...@suumitsu.eu wrote:
Hi,
My bad, package hubicfuse has to be removed (correct package is
hubicfuse-git). Feel free to test the package, but I think I added
all deps
Removed, please include a link to the package next time.
--
Maxime
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Charles Bos charlesb...@gmail.com wrote:
Can the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/
packages/compiz-pure/
It's supposed to provide Compiz 0.8 plus the gtk-window-decorator. The
package is orphaned, hasn't been updated in nearly 4 years,
On Friday, March 21, 2014 20:04:22 Ivaylo Kuzev wrote:
Hi,
The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2].
Please remove [1].
[1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-smex--git/
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-smex-git/
Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo
Removed,
Hi,
The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2].
Please remove [1].
[1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-smex--git/
[2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-smex-git/
Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo
Please remove linux-selinux:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-selinux/
Support for SELinux has been merged into the official Arch Linux kernel.
Thanks
--
Timothée Ravier
On 19/03/2014 01:11, Timothée Ravier wrote:
Please remove linux-selinux:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-selinux/
Support for SELinux has been merged into the official Arch Linux kernel.
Thanks
Done.
--
Sébastien Seblu Luttringer
https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42
GPG:
On Fri 14 Mar 2014 at 17:36, Pyro Devil wrote:
Hi again!
I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package
still exists. ;)
Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked.
Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Pyro Devil:
Hi!
I am
I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package
still exists. ;)
Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked.
There was a discussion about the package name; and the suggested move
was to removing lightworks, and move existing lwks into
On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 18:37, Jonathan Steel wrote:
On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 19:24, Nowaker wrote:
I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package
still exists. ;)
Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked.
There was a discussion
Please remove[1]
This is replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-dcpj715w-cups/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-brother-dcpj715w-cups
On 2014-03-16 10:46 +0100
Berno Strik wrote:
Please remove[1]
This is replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-dcpj715w-cups/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-brother-dcpj715w-cups
done, thanks
Please remove[1] and [2].
They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3140cn/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-cupswrapper
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-lpr
Please ignore this one.
I made a mistake
On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:52:26 +0100
Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com wrote:
Please remove[1] and [2].
They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3140cn/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-cupswrapper
[2]
Please remove[1] and [2].
They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw-cupswrapper
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw-lpr
Request removal of: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pencil-svn/
This project is dead and development continues under the pencil2D fork
(which is now also available in the AUR), making this package redundant.
Thanks and best regards,
N30N.
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 21:56:25 N30N wrote:
Request removal of: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pencil-svn/
This project is dead and development continues under the pencil2D fork
(which is now also available in the AUR), making this package redundant.
Thanks and best regards,
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 14:04:00 Berno Strik wrote:
Please remove[1] and [2].
They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw/
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw-cupswrapper
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw-lpr
Hi again!
I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package
still exists. ;)
Cheers,
Pyro Devil
Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Pyro Devil:
Hi!
I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and
request removal because of duplication.
Hey, please remove python2-pycrypto [1] as it is an orphaned duplicate
of python2-crypto [2].
Seems it was created by accident (as pointed out in the comments)
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycrypto/
[2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/python2-crypto/
cheers
On Sunday, March 09, 2014 12:56:55 Levente Polyak wrote:
Hey, please remove python2-pycrypto [1] as it is an orphaned duplicate
of python2-crypto [2].
Seems it was created by accident (as pointed out in the comments)
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycrypto/
[2]
Hi,
Please delete my package perl-webservice-mtgox [1]. It is no longer
works and MtGox was closed.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-webservice-mtgox/
With the best wishes,
--
Anton Leontiev
On Saturday, March 08, 2014 20:22:42 Anton Leontiev wrote:
Hi,
Please delete my package perl-webservice-mtgox [1]. It is no longer
works and MtGox was closed.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-webservice-mtgox/
With the best wishes,
Removed, thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
Hello,
package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weston-rbp is now obsolete since
Raspberry Pi patched version is already included in ArchLinuxARM
repositories: http://archlinuxarm.org/packages?search=weston
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Srki srki...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weston-rbp is now obsolete
since
Raspberry Pi patched version is already included in ArchLinuxARM
repositories: http://archlinuxarm.org/packages?search=weston
Deleted, thx.
--
On Friday 28 February 2014 21:12:57 Andy Weidenbaum wrote:
This package
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitcoin-daemon-electrum/has been made
obsolete by the new version of electrum-server-git.
Removed, thank you.
--
С уважением, Е.Алексеев.
Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev.
e-mail:
On Friday 28 February 2014 18:25:03 Andy Weidenbaum wrote:
I no longer wish to maintain this
packagehttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/electrum-entropy
The package has several votes and it isn't broken. So I don't think that
removal of tha package is needed. And I hope someone will adopt it in
1 - 100 of 1263 matches
Mail list logo
