[aur-general] Removal request: pidgin-knotify

2011-10-17 Thread Jan Böhringer
Hello, I'm the maintainer of pidgin-knotify( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32919 ) in the AUR and i think the package should be removed as soon as possible. Today a user notified me about an unfixed bug, which allows remote command injection. It does not seem like this will be fixed in

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: pidgin-knotify

2011-10-17 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Jan Böhringer jan...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm the maintainer of pidgin-knotify( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32919 ) in the AUR and i Removed. :)

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: pidgin-knotify

2011-10-17 Thread Jan Böhringer
Thank you 2011/10/17 Evangelos Foutras evange...@foutrelis.com: On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Jan Böhringer jan...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I'm the maintainer of pidgin-knotify( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32919 ) in the AUR and i Removed. :)

[aur-general] Removal request (spring-framework-doc)

2011-10-16 Thread Ondřej Kučera
Hello, I'd like to request removal of spring-framework-doc (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40522), I have a new PKGBUILD ready for spring-framework which creates both packages (spring-framework and spring-framework-doc). Thanks. Ondřej Kučera -- Cheers, Ondřej Kučera

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (spring-framework-doc)

2011-10-16 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Done, thanks. Bartłomiej Piotrowski

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-10-15 Thread foalsrock
Hello, I'm the maintainer of the following packages which became outdated with Gnome 3.2 release and have not been updated since. gnome-shell-extension-arrow-key-window-selector-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50646 gnome-shell-extension-window-list:

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-10-15 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 10/15/2011 12:29 PM, foalsrock wrote: Hello, I'm the maintainer of the following packages which became outdated with Gnome 3.2 release and have not been updated since. gnome-shell-extension-arrow-key-window-selector-git: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50646

[aur-general] Removal request: 3 unused python2-xy-* packages

2011-10-14 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, since version 2.7.* Python(x,y) is no longer distributed in separate packages (light,basic and full) and there is no eclipse bundled anymore. Because of this, package python2-xy replaces all other python2-xy-* packages. I'd like to ask for removal of: python2-xy-noeclipse

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: 3 unused python2-xy-* packages

2011-10-14 Thread Bartłomiej Piotrowski
Done. Bartłomiej Piotrowski

[aur-general] Removal request: lsd-svn

2011-10-13 Thread Jakob Nixdorf
Hello, Could someone please remove my package 'lsd-svn' [1]? The program was replaced by cinux-loader [2] and is not longer supported/developed. Thanks, Jakob [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24921 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28841 -- Mail/Jabber:

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: lsd-svn

2011-10-13 Thread Alexander Rødseth
Hi, Thank you. Removed. -- Cordially,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-10-11 Thread H . Gökhan Sarı
Hello, Can you please remove my package bluemarine* because there is no such application anymore. Thanks, [0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33302 -- H.Gökhan Sarı th...@returnfalse.net

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-10-11 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:38 PM, H.Gökhan Sarı th...@returnfalse.net wrote: Hello, Can you please remove my package bluemarine* because there is no such application anymore. Thanks, [0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33302 -- H.Gökhan Sarı th...@returnfalse.net Done and

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-28 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Pierre Bourdon delr...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The package minted [1] does not build and minted.sty is actually provided by texlive-latexextra. Deleted, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-28 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Max Roder maxro...@web.de wrote: Hi, please remove python-libchamplain https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40969 It was needed by kismon only, but is not anymore. As 0.6.1, the latest version supporting python is outdated and pretty old (0.12 is out),

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-28 Thread rafael ff1
2011/9/28 Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com: On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Max Roder maxro...@web.de wrote: Hi, please remove python-libchamplain https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40969 It was needed by kismon only, but is not anymore. As 0.6.1, the latest version supporting

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-28 Thread Max Roder
Hi, rafael ff1 wrote on 09/28/2011 04:12 PM: It seems that the requester is the maintainer. IMHO, if the package can't be updated to newer version with python support, should not be flagged as out-of-date. You're absolutly right. I am the maintainer (sorry, forgot to mention that) and the

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-28 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Max Roder maxro...@web.de wrote: Hi, rafael ff1 wrote on 09/28/2011 04:12 PM: It seems that the requester is the maintainer. IMHO, if the package can't be updated to newer version with python support, should not be flagged as out-of-date. You're

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-27 Thread Max Roder
Hi, please remove python-libchamplain https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40969 It was needed by kismon only, but is not anymore. As 0.6.1, the latest version supporting python is outdated and pretty old (0.12 is out), it should be removed I think. Thanks, Max signature.asc

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-27 Thread Pierre Bourdon
Hi, The package minted [1] does not build and minted.sty is actually provided by texlive-latexextra. Another package called latex-minted was actually deleted in March for the same reason [2]. Thanks in advance! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52466 [2]

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-23 Thread Antonis Kouliakiotis
Please remove nnotes-git [1]. The project has been renamed to 'notably' so I submitted a new package by that name [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52091 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52534

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-23 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 09/23/2011 02:07 PM, Antonis Kouliakiotis wrote: Please remove nnotes-git [1]. The project has been renamed to 'notably' so I submitted a new package by that name [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52091 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52534 Done!

[aur-general] Removal request for `ocaml-compiler-libs`

2011-09-16 Thread Sergei Lebedev
Can you please remove `ocaml-compiler-libs` [1] from AUR? - it's outdated - there's a proposal [2] to add this to `ocaml` package in Arch Bug Tracker - there's a *supported* AUR package [3] which includes compiler libs [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12333 [2]

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for `ocaml-compiler-libs`

2011-09-16 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 16/09/11 12:48, Sergei Lebedev wrote: Can you please remove `ocaml-compiler-libs` [1] from AUR? Yup, removed.

[aur-general] Removal request for `camlmix`

2011-09-16 Thread Sergei Lebedev
One more removal request -- `camlmix` [*] this time. I've addopted the package and renamed it to `ocaml-camlmix`, to mach OCaml Packaging Guideline. Thanks! [*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18885

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for `camlmix`

2011-09-16 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 16 September 2011 15:01, Sergei Lebedev superbo...@gmail.com wrote: One more removal request -- `camlmix` [*] this time. I've addopted the package and renamed it to `ocaml-camlmix`, to mach OCaml Packaging Guideline. Thanks! [*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18885 Done.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-15 Thread Max Roder
Hey, Stefan Husmann schrieb am 09/08/2011 07:57 PM: Max Roder wrote on 08/31/2011 10:00 PM: don't want to be annyoing - but maybe this (see above) did not reach the list? Please let me know about anything wrong with it, if so. sometimes things get lost, even on a mailing list read by many

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-08 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 09/08/2011 04:58 AM, Cyker Way wrote: Please remove mpy and mpy-git. Due to name conflicts on PyPI, they have been renamed as ncmpy and ncmpy-git. Thanks! mpy and mpy-git seem to already have been removed.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-08 Thread Andrea Scarpino
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 09:49:20 AM Jakob Gruber wrote: mpy and mpy-git seem to already have been removed. He sent the request twice: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-September/015781.html -- Andrea

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-08 Thread Max Roder
Max Roder wrote on 08/31/2011 10:00 PM: Hi, aircrack-ptw [1] can safly be removed. The ptw method is included in aircrack-ng. Aircrack-ptw is unmaintained for years now. In addition, it's not available on the official homepage anymore. Just clicked through all those madwifi packages. As

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-08 Thread Krzysztof Raczkowski
Following packages are old and not maintained: kadu-beta1 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36442 kadu-beta2 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37741 kadu-light - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9701 These packages are 0.6.6 beta and 0.5.0 versions. kadu is in

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-08 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 08.09.2011 19:44, schrieb Krzysztof Raczkowski: Following packages are old and not maintained: kadu-beta1 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36442 kadu-beta2 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37741 kadu-light - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9701 These packages

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-08 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 08.09.2011 18:09, schrieb Max Roder: Max Roder wrote on 08/31/2011 10:00 PM: Hi, aircrack-ptw [1] can safly be removed. The ptw method is included in aircrack-ng. Aircrack-ptw is unmaintained for years now. In addition, it's not available on the official homepage anymore. Just clicked

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-09-07 Thread Cyker Way
Please remove mpy and mpy-git. Due to name conflicts on PyPI, they have been renamed as ncmpy and ncmpy-git. Thanks! -- Cyker Way E-mail: cyker...@gmail.com http://www.cykerway.com

[aur-general] Removal request (ptscotch)

2011-09-05 Thread Michele Mocciola
Please, remove ptscotch package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23389), it's a duplicate of ptscotch-mpich2. Thanks!

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (ptscotch)

2011-09-05 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Michele Mocciola mimocci...@yahoo.com wrote: Please, remove ptscotch package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23389), it's a duplicate of ptscotch-mpich2. Removed, thanks.

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-31 Thread Max Roder
Hi, I think airoscript-svn [1] can safely be removed, as the svn repository is empty and [2] provides the current version. Thanks, Max [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28156 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33596 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-31 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Max Roder maxro...@web.de wrote: Hi, I think airoscript-svn [1] can safely be removed, as the svn repository is empty and [2] provides the current version. Deleted, thanks.

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-31 Thread Max Roder
Hi, aircrack-ptw [1] can safly be removed. The ptw method is included in aircrack-ng. Aircrack-ptw is unmaintained for years now. In addition, it's not available on the official homepage anymore. Just clicked through all those madwifi packages. As ath5k superseded madwifi (and is actually

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-29 Thread Max Roder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I think fbsplash-uswsusp [1] should be deleted, as uswsusp-fbsplash [2] provides the same and is up-to-date. Thanks, Max [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32300 [2] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16233 -BEGIN PGP

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-29 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Max Roder maxro...@web.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I think fbsplash-uswsusp [1] should be deleted, as uswsusp-fbsplash [2] provides the same and is up-to-date. Deleted, thanks. Also, please consider using PGP/MIME instead of

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-21 Thread Jamie Nguyen
Please can the following packages by removed from the AUR (all of which are now orphans and all of which were previously my own): kernel26-ccs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44131  == replaced by linux-ccs nvidia-lts-ccs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47235  ==

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-21 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Jamie Nguyen ja...@tomoyolinux.co.uk wrote: Please can the following packages by removed from the AUR (all of which are now orphans and all of which were previously my own): kernel26-ccs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44131  == replaced by linux-ccs

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-17 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 10.08.2011 22:37, schrieb gadget3000: mpd-pulse (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18722) is deprecated as mpd in [extra] has pulseaudio support built in. I checked this myself by following the instructions here: http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/PulseAudio#Setting_up_MPD and 'pulse' was

[aur-general] Removal request kernel26-selinux

2011-08-16 Thread Nicky726
Hello, TUs, as the maintainer of kernel26-selinux [1] I ask for its removal, as it has been made obsolete by linux-selinux [2]. May this also serve as a notice to the users who do not subscribe to package comments. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32045 [2]

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-16 Thread gadget3000
freedoko-bin32 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29644). It exists as freedoko (http://aur.archlinux.org/packagesreson.php?.php?ID=15705http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15705) and I can't find a reason for a 32-bit only version. No votes, no maintainer and out of date.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-16 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:42 PM, gadget3000 gadget3...@msn.com wrote: freedoko-bin32 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29644). It exists as freedoko (http://aur.archlinux.org/packagesreson.php?.php?ID=15705http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15705) and I can't find a reason for a

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-14 Thread gadget3000
tux-ragnarok-full (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34062) - Dead multiplayer project. Dead source link and I can't find a mirror. 3 votes and hasn't been updated since Feb 2010. No maintainer.

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-14 Thread gadget3000
theforgottenserver-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21881) The svn repository is no longer available to the public (Source: http://otland.net/f55/moved-private-subversion-11833/). There used to be a public repository at http://svn.otland.net/public/forgottenserver; but that no longer

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-14 Thread Peter Lewis
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, gadget3000 wrote: tux-ragnarok-full (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34062) - Dead multiplayer project. Dead source link and I can't find a mirror. 3 votes and hasn't been updated since Feb 2010. No maintainer. Agreed - deleted. Pete.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-14 Thread Peter Lewis
On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, gadget3000 wrote: theforgottenserver-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21881) The svn repository is no longer available to the public (Source: http://otland.net/f55/moved-private-subversion-11833/). There used to be a public repository at

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-13 Thread gadget3000
tecnoballz-snapshot (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4377) has been replaced by tecnoballz (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45077)

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-13 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:23 PM, gadget3000 gadget3...@msn.com wrote: tecnoballz-snapshot (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4377) has been replaced by tecnoballz (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45077) Removed, thanks.

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-13 Thread gadget3000
glest-tileset-autumn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21791) is included in megaglest which is in [community] (Source: http://www.titusgames.de/news.html#tilesets)

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-13 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:20 PM, gadget3000 gadget3...@msn.com wrote: glest-tileset-autumn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21791) is included in megaglest which is in [community] (Source: http://www.titusgames.de/news.html#tilesets) Done thank you!

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-12 Thread gadget3000
Please remove kernel26-sony (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49563) because linux-sony (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51456) replaces it.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-12 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:32 PM, gadget3000 gadget3...@msn.com wrote: Please remove kernel26-sony (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49563) because linux-sony (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51456) replaces it. Done, thanks.

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-12 Thread A Rojas
please remove nepomukcontroller http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45131 as it is included in KDE 4.7

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-12 Thread Florian Pritz
On 12.08.2011 21:10, A Rojas wrote: please remove nepomukcontroller http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45131 as it is included in KDE 4.7 removed -- Florian Pritz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-11 Thread Bogdan Ionuț
kernel26-bfs ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36384 ) has been replaced by linux-bfs ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50934 ) thanks in advance.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-08-11 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Bogdan Ionuț bog...@punctweb.ro wrote: kernel26-bfs ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36384 ) has been replaced by linux-bfs ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50934 ) thanks in advance. done

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-10 Thread Luca Bennati
warzone-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8384 since upstream doesn't use SVN anymore

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-10 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luca Bennati luc...@gmail.com wrote: warzone-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8384 since upstream doesn't use SVN anymore Removed, thanks.

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-10 Thread gadget3000
splashy (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10211) has been replaced by splashy-full. Subsequently it has no maintainer and hasn't been updated since August 09.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-10 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 08/10/2011 10:30 PM, gadget3000 wrote: splashy (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10211) has been replaced by splashy-full. Subsequently it has no maintainer and hasn't been updated since August 09. Done! -- Jelle van der Waa

[aur-general] Removal request for kernel26-fbcondecor

2011-08-08 Thread Heiko Baums
Hi TUs, you can remove my package kernel26-fbcondecor (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15603) from AUR. I have renamed it to linux-fbcondecor (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50924) and upgraded it to 3.0.1. Heiko

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for kernel26-fbcondecor

2011-08-08 Thread Jakob Gruber
On 08/08/2011 11:22 PM, Heiko Baums wrote: Hi TUs, you can remove my package kernel26-fbcondecor (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15603) from AUR. I have renamed it to linux-fbcondecor (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50924) and upgraded it to 3.0.1. Heiko Done, thanks.

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-01 Thread Luca Bennati
kde4-kstyle-nitrogen (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30462) Dead upstream

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-01 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
On 1 August 2011 10:35, Luca Bennati luc...@gmail.com wrote: kde4-kstyle-nitrogen (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30462) Dead upstream Sources are still available...

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-01 Thread Luca Bennati
Where? I couldn't find it in kde-looks 2011/8/1 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com On 1 August 2011 10:35, Luca Bennati luc...@gmail.com wrote: kde4-kstyle-nitrogen (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30462) Dead upstream Sources are still available...

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-08-01 Thread Det
On 08/01/2011 01:50 PM, Luca Bennati wrote: Where? I couldn't find it in kde-looks 2011/8/1 Lukáš Jirkovskýl.jirkov...@gmail.com Apparently the page isn't but the sources are. Doesn't work: http://kde-look.org/content/show.php/Nitrogen-style?content=112652 Works:

[aur-general] [removal request] luakit-noscript-git

2011-07-09 Thread Uli Armbruster
Please remove my package luakit-noscript-git. It was merged into the develop branch which is used in the package luakit-git. I only created this package to make it easier for users to test this plugin. You can find it here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50387

Re: [aur-general] [removal request] luakit-noscript-git

2011-07-09 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 06:27:21PM +0200, Uli Armbruster wrote: Please remove my package luakit-noscript-git. It was merged into the develop branch which is used in the package luakit-git. I only created this package to make it easier for users to test this plugin. You can find it here

[aur-general] Removal request for xfce-menu-edit

2011-06-30 Thread Heiko Baums
xfce-menu-edit is obsolete. It doesn't compile anymore, doesn't work with Xfce 4.8 anyway and is orphaned. So I guess it should be removed from AUR. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=39370 See also the last maintainer's comment in AUR. Heiko

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for xfce-menu-edit

2011-06-30 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 30 June 2011 22:01, Heiko Baums li...@baums-on-web.de wrote: xfce-menu-edit is obsolete. It doesn't compile anymore, doesn't work with Xfce 4.8 anyway and is orphaned. Removed, thanks.

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-06-15 Thread Massimiliano Torromeo
Please remove the kag[1] PKGBUILD. It is too hard to package, the source is on mediafire and the app tries to automatically overwrite every file at every version update. Thanks. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49442

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-06-15 Thread Jelle van der Waa
On 06/15/2011 04:14 PM, Massimiliano Torromeo wrote: Please remove the kag[1] PKGBUILD. It is too hard to package, the source is on mediafire and the app tries to automatically overwrite every file at every version update. Thanks. [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49442 Removed,

[aur-general] Removal Request: luaevent-prosody

2011-06-03 Thread Dwayne Bent
Since my original email is stuck in moderation... Please remove luaevent-prosody http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34658. It doesn't compile with libevent 2.x and its changes have been merged upstream in luaevent 0.3.1. Thanks. -- Dwayne Bent

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: luaevent-prosody

2011-06-03 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:24 PM, Dwayne Bent dbb.a...@liqd.org wrote: Since my original email is stuck in moderation... Please remove luaevent-prosody http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34658. It doesn't compile with libevent 2.x and its changes have been merged upstream in luaevent

[aur-general] Removal request of xorg-server-compositing-fix

2011-05-14 Thread Det
Hellooo, Please dematerialize xorg-server-compositing-fix [1]. The maintainer already requested for its destruction when 1.9.3 would hit the repo but apparently TUs forgot about it or something. [1] = http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41438 Thanks for your time, Det

Re: [aur-general] Removal request of xorg-server-compositing-fix

2011-05-14 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 06:12:09PM +0300, Det wrote: Hellooo, Please dematerialize xorg-server-compositing-fix [1]. The maintainer already requested for its destruction when 1.9.3 would hit the repo but apparently TUs forgot about it or something. [1] =

[aur-general] removal request

2011-05-07 Thread A Rojas
kdeplasma-extra-plaspool http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48389 I have reuploaded under the standard upstream name plaspool

Re: [aur-general] removal request

2011-05-07 Thread Stefan Husmann
Am 07.05.2011 09:54, schrieb A Rojas: kdeplasma-extra-plaspool http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48389 I have reuploaded under the standard upstream name plaspool Done, thank you.

[aur-general] Removal request for keepass

2011-05-07 Thread Kirill Churin
Please delete keepass package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31943). I've reuploaded it's update as keepass2 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48814). Thanks. -- Kirill Churin Jabber: reflex...@reflexing.ru, ICQ: 8163230

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for keepass

2011-05-07 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Kirill Churin reflex...@reflexing.ru wrote: Please delete keepass package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31943). I've reuploaded it's update as keepass2 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48814). Thanks. -- Kirill Churin Jabber:

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for keepass

2011-05-07 Thread Kirill Churin
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote: It seems keepass has 2 versions, keepass which is at 1.xxx and one keepass2 2.xxx I don't see a problem here. The problem here is that keepass you mentioned is actually a keepass 2.x package. I've updated package and given

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for keepass

2011-05-07 Thread Seblu
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Kirill Churin reflex...@reflexing.ru wrote: Please delete keepass package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31943). I've reuploaded it's update as keepass2

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for keepass

2011-05-07 Thread Kirill Churin
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote: On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Kirill Churin reflex...@reflexing.ru wrote: Please delete keepass package (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=31943).

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for keepass

2011-05-07 Thread Thomas Dziedzic
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Kirill Churin reflex...@reflexing.ru wrote: On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Seblu se...@seblu.net wrote: On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Thomas Dziedzic gos...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Kirill Churin reflex...@reflexing.ru wrote: Please

[aur-general] removal request

2011-05-05 Thread Grigorios Bouzakis
Please delete this: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38263 Its provided by pciutils now in core. Greg

Re: [aur-general] removal request

2011-05-05 Thread Ángel Velásquez
2011/5/5 Grigorios Bouzakis grb...@xsmail.com: Please delete this: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38263 Its provided by pciutils now in core. Greg Done -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909

[aur-general] Removal request for bonnie++

2011-05-04 Thread Heiko Baums
Hi TUs, I guess bonnie++ (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43476) can bei removed from AUR, since it's in [community]. Heiko

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for bonnie++

2011-05-04 Thread Sven-Hendrik Haase
On 05.05.2011 03:01, Heiko Baums wrote: Hi TUs, I guess bonnie++ (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43476) can bei removed from AUR, since it's in [community]. Heiko Le destroy

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-04-25 Thread Luca Bennati
python-flack http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45370 is a dup of python-flask http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36557 with incorrect naming

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-04-25 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 25 April 2011 15:06, Luca Bennati luc...@gmail.com wrote: python-flack http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45370 is a dup of python-flask http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36557 with incorrect naming Indeed; removed. :)

[aur-general] Removal Request

2011-04-24 Thread Luca Bennati
dolphin-emu-cmake-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43906 - clearly asked by maintainer as it has become a duplicate

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

2011-04-24 Thread Evangelos Foutras
On 25 April 2011 00:14, Luca Bennati luc...@gmail.com wrote: dolphin-emu-cmake-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=43906 - clearly asked by maintainer as it has become a duplicate Removed, thanks!

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-04-22 Thread H . Gökhan Sarı
Hello, Can you please remove my package stardict-english_turkish* whose source is not available anymore. Thanks, [0]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33084 -- The moment you enter into the world of words you start falling away from that which is. The more you enter into language, the

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011-04-22 Thread Dave Reisner
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:42:02AM +0300, H.Gökhan Sarı wrote: Hello, Can you please remove my package stardict-english_turkish* whose source is not available anymore. Thanks, [0]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33084 -- The moment you enter into the world of words you

[aur-general] Removal request

2011-04-20 Thread H . Gökhan Sarı
Hello, Can you please remove my package conextant-firmware*? I think it is obsolete now. Thanks, [0]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=19148 -- To do the same thing over and over again is not only boredom: it is to be controlled by rather than to control what you do. -Heraclitus

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >