Wait a moment, you're fetching a specific release, then you shouldn't
suffix your package with -git [1]. Even more, you don't need git at all
in this case, as there's a tarball available including a signature
file. I'd recommend using xen-dev or something like that to indicate
you're fetching a tes
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] requesting a critique for my build of
> xen-git-4.5.0-rc3> - doing `unset CFLAGS` *after* make looks pointless> -
> "xen::git+git://" looks redundant> - messages with lots of "" seem
> awkward > - are you sure that
* Doug McMillan (Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:54:34 -0600):
> Thank you for the critique. I have fixed the name, changed from
[…]
One more thing: you are dlm1065@etcetera, but the maintainer is listed
as Triton (jacek@etcetera). You should me him/her a contributor and
list yourself as maintainer.
And abo
On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 at 06:54:34 PM, Doug McMillan wrote:
>
> > Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:54:04 +0100
> > From: marcel.kor...@gmail.com
> > To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> > Subject: Re: [aur-general] requesting a critique for my build of
> > xe
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:54:04 +0100
> From: marcel.kor...@gmail.com
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] requesting a critique for my build of
> xen-git-4.5.0-rc3
> Please rework the PKGBUILD and post it at Github gist or Pastebin, so
> it
* Pablo Lezaeta Reyes [2014-12-16 13:50:58 -0300]:
> 2014-12-16 6:05 GMT-03:00 Florian Bruhin :
> >
> > * Robert Mackanics [2014-12-16 03:42:51 -0500]:
> > > On Monday, December 15, 2014 16:54:04 Marcel Korpel wrote:
> > > > Third, don't use md5sums to check file integrity; to avoid collisions,
>
2014-12-16 6:05 GMT-03:00 Florian Bruhin :
>
> * Robert Mackanics [2014-12-16 03:42:51 -0500]:
> > On Monday, December 15, 2014 16:54:04 Marcel Korpel wrote:
> > > Third, don't use md5sums to check file integrity; to avoid collisions,
> > > it is recommended that you use sha256sums. You can set th
* Robert Mackanics [2014-12-16 03:42:51 -0500]:
> On Monday, December 15, 2014 16:54:04 Marcel Korpel wrote:
> > Third, don't use md5sums to check file integrity; to avoid collisions,
> > it is recommended that you use sha256sums. You can set this
> > in /etc/makepkg.conf (and then you can use upd
On Monday, December 15, 2014 16:54:04 Marcel Korpel wrote:
> Third, don't use md5sums to check file integrity; to avoid collisions,
> it is recommended that you use sha256sums. You can set this
> in /etc/makepkg.conf (and then you can use updpkgsums to generate them).
Should we have the makepkg.co
* Doug McMillan (Sat, 13 Dec 2014 23:32:05 -0600):
> To have a safer more reliable place I made a sourceforge project.
> The xen files are
> herehttps://sourceforge.net/projects/xenforarch/files/build/xen/ The
> package I am asking for the critique on
> ishttps://sourceforge.net/projects/xenforarc
, 9 Dec 2014 18:08:08 +0100
> From: marcel.kor...@gmail.com
> To: aur-general@archlinux.org
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] requesting a critique for my build of
> xen-git-4.5.0-rc3
>
> * Doug McMillan (Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:16:11 -0600):
> > http://www.filehosting.org/file/det
* Doug McMillan (Mon, 8 Dec 2014 19:16:11 -0600):
> http://www.filehosting.org/file/details/466100/xen-git-4.5_rc3.tar.gz
Why on earth does that filehosting site need my email address, just "to
send me a download link"? Sorry, I'm not going to do that.
Please host that file somewhere else and I'
I am not sure the proper etiquette so tell me if this is not appropriate.
I uploaded my package to
http://www.filehosting.org/file/details/466100/xen-git-4.5_rc3.tar.gz
I am hoping that anyone that anyone that has a moment can take a look and tell
me if I did anything wrong. I made a new package
13 matches
Mail list logo