[aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-05 Thread James Knight via aur-general
Hello -- new user to AUR and hoping if anyone is willing to review a PKGBUILD [1] definition for me. I have been reading PKGBUILD [2] and "AUR - Submitting packages" [3] documents, which the latter document suggests to "... submit the PKGBUILD to the AUR mailing list ... for public review before a

Re: [aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-05 Thread Brett Cornwall via aur-general
On 2019-03-06 01:24, James Knight via aur-general wrote: Hello -- new user to AUR and hoping if anyone is willing to review a PKGBUILD [1] definition for me. I have been reading PKGBUILD [2] and "AUR - Submitting packages" [3] documents, which the latter document suggests to "... submit the PKGBU

Re: [aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-05 Thread Brett Cornwall via aur-general
On 2019-03-05 23:53, Brett Cornwall wrote: url='https://releng.io/' arch=('any') license=('BSD') I don't see this license in the project. It needs to be in the project, and if it is indeed BSD licensed you need to copy the license to "$pkgdir/usr/share/licenses/$pkgname/" [1] Oops... I suck

Re: [aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-05 Thread Doug Newgard via aur-general
On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 23:53:10 -0700 Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: > On 2019-03-06 01:24, James Knight via aur-general wrote: > >Hello -- new user to AUR and hoping if anyone is willing to review a > >PKGBUILD [1] definition for me. I have been reading PKGBUILD [2] and > >"AUR - Submitting p

Re: [aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-05 Thread DJ Lucas (LFS)
On March 6, 2019 12:24:08 AM CST, James Knight via aur-general wrote: >Hello -- new user to AUR and hoping if anyone is willing to review a >PKGBUILD [1] definition for me. I have been reading PKGBUILD [2] and >"AUR - Submitting packages" [3] documents, which the latter document >suggests to "...

Re: [aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-06 Thread James Knight via aur-general
On 2019-03-06 2:03 AM, DJ Lucas (LFS) wrote: pkgname=releng-tool Python 2/3? The package type does support either Python variant. When I was first making the package, I first attempted to build the PKGBUILD file following the "Python package guidelines" [1]; however, I felt that it would b

Re: [aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-06 Thread James Knight via aur-general
On 2019-03-06 1:59 AM, Doug Newgard via aur-general wrote: On Tue, 5 Mar 2019 23:53:10 -0700 Brett Cornwall via aur-general wrote: Capitalize the T! Can do! You're using python-setuptools, so you'll want to set that in makedepends instead of python. Noted. Also missing git as a makedepe

Re: [aur-general] rfc: pkgbuild for prospect releng-tool

2019-03-06 Thread Daurnimator
On Wed, 6 Mar. 2019, 18:54 James Knight via aur-general, < aur-general@archlinux.org> wrote: > From my past experience with downloading versioned tarballs from GitHub > is that there is no guarantee that the fetched package will always be > the same hash (useless this is something that has recentl