On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> But given I don't want them there, I agree that we decided [community] does
>> not need AUR!
>
> Agreed. In my opinion, AUR should be used for unsupported packages only.
>
So then wo
2009/3/5 Evangelos Foutras :
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
>> But given I don't want them there, I agree that we decided [community] does
>> not need AUR!
>
> Agreed. In my opinion, AUR should be used for unsupported packages only.
>
+1 also for me.
AUR: Arch Linux Unsuppo
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Allan McRae wrote:
> But given I don't want them there, I agree that we decided [community] does
> not need AUR!
Agreed. In my opinion, AUR should be used for unsupported packages only.
Loui Chang wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:46:49AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
2009/3/5 Aaron Griffin :
But, I guess you're right
that the AUR needs some sort of changes in order to be able to do
this.
Maybe we must only edit run-tupkgu
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:46:49AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> > 2009/3/5 Aaron Griffin :
> >
> >> But, I guess you're right
> >> that the AUR needs some sort of changes in order to be able to do
> >> this.
> >>
> >>
> > Maybe we must only edit run-tupkgupdate and
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>>
>> 2009/3/5 Aaron Griffin :
>>
>>>
>>> But, I guess you're right
>>> that the AUR needs some sort of changes in order to be able to do
>>> this.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Maybe we must only edit run-tupkgupdate and communitypkg on
Andrea Scarpino wrote:
2009/3/5 Aaron Griffin :
But, I guess you're right
that the AUR needs some sort of changes in order to be able to do
this.
Maybe we must only edit run-tupkgupdate and communitypkg on AUR?
(not sure of this)
Well, those will not be needed at all once the swit
2009/3/5 Aaron Griffin :
> But, I guess you're right
> that the AUR needs some sort of changes in order to be able to do
> this.
>
Maybe we must only edit run-tupkgupdate and communitypkg on AUR?
(not sure of this)
--
Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Allan McRae wrote:
> Hi TUs,
>
> You may remember that we voted to move the community repo to use the
> official db scripts but not much has happened. Can I get a status update on
> what is happening with AUR support for this? That is the major hold-up.
Actually,
Hi TUs,
You may remember that we voted to move the community repo to use the
official db scripts but not much has happened. Can I get a status
update on what is happening with AUR support for this? That is the
major hold-up.
Allan
10 matches
Mail list logo
