vlad schrieb:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:29:34PM +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Hello,
zattoo still needs it. It is flagged out of date, though.
I submitted xulrunner-1.8 some time ago to AUR.
Now there is no need for this package as zattoo has no client for
Linux anymore. It is only
I know it used to be required for Aptana, which is why it was uploaded (I
think). Now it isn't required by it anymore, though.
Smartboy
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Phillip Smith arch-gene...@fukawi2.nl
wrote:
Smartboy schrieb:
I know it used to be required for Aptana, which is why it was uploaded (I
think). Now it isn't required by it anymore, though.
Smartboy
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Eric Bélanger snowmanisc...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Phillip Smith
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 06:29:34PM +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Hello,
zattoo still needs it. It is flagged out of date, though.
I submitted xulrunner-1.8 some time ago to AUR.
Now there is no need for this package as zattoo has no client for
Linux anymore. It is only available as a
I'm going through the orphans list in the AUR at the moment looking for
packages to adopt, and came across xulrunner. Given then xulrunner is now in
extra, shouldn't it be removed from the AUR?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Phillip Smith arch-gene...@fukawi2.nl wrote:
I'm going through the orphans list in the AUR at the moment looking for
packages to adopt, and came across xulrunner. Given then xulrunner is now in
extra, shouldn't it be removed from the AUR?
The package in AUR
The package in AUR is xulrunner-1.8, not xulrunner. I guess it's
there because it is (was?) required for apps that didn't worked with
the latest xulrunner.
Ah, I didn't notice that... Crisis averted! ;)
