Re: [aur-general] Removal request (stone-soup-tile)

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 02:21:26PM +0100, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Hi, (snip) > Provided that stone-soup-title has additional features enabled, and > schuay was fine with the existence of the AUR package at the time, I > think it should be kept in AUR. Actually, it doesn't… The `stone-soup' pack

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (stone-soup-tile)

Hi, stone-soup-title on AUR (first submitted Fri, 23 May 2008) existed before the stone-soup pkg (from the git log: 2010-09-12, stone-soup added from [unsupported], schuay). Since schuay didn't delete stone-soup-title from AUR and since stone-soup-title has conflicts=('stone-soup'), it seems like

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: alephone-ttep-*

On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Marcin 'armitage' Skory wrote: > Hello. > I would like to request removal of the following packages: >  - alephone-ttep-marathon (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24011) >  - alephone-ttep-marathon2 (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24009) >  - al

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request - telepathy-kde-presence-dataengine-git

On 20.12.2011 13:51, George Brooke wrote: > Hi, > > Please remove telepathy-kde-presence-dataengine-git [1] which doesn't build > due to api breakage in latest telepathy-qt and will not be fixed upstream > since > it is about to be made obselete. > > Thanks > > George B > > > [1] https://au

Re: [aur-general] removal request (qtd-svn)

On 18.12.2011 19:47, Gour wrote: > Hello, > > qtd-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25827) is obsolete > since qtd project is now at bitbucket and there is newer qtd-hg package. > > > Sincerely, > Gour > Done. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/

Re: [aur-general] removal request - nvtv

On 12/18/2011 08:22 PM, Stefan Wilkens wrote: > Please remove. > > name: nvtv > aur link: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4234 > reason: no changes since 2006, no longer workable with latest xserver, > segfaults on latest nvidia driver, no patches available. > > thanks. Sounds reasonable

Re: [aur-general] removal request - monitorix-tmpfs

On 12/18/2011 01:19 PM, member graysky wrote: > Please delete this entry: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34134 > > I have uploaded its successor called, monitorix-sync-daemon. Having both > is just confusing. > > Thx! Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] removal request (fossil-fossil)

On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Gour wrote: > > Hi! > > Orphaned and mostly obsolete since there is fossil package, so I believe > it can be removed: > > fossil-fossil: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44775 > > > Sincerely, > Gour > > -- > One who restrains the senses of action but who

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

Hi, I've discussed the matter with other TU's. Here's one way we can handle this: - If a package appears on AUR that has direct links to commercial/abandonware/warez, send an e-mail to this mailinglist. - A TU will then promptly adopt the package in question, remove the direct link and then leave

Re: [aur-general] removal request: dmd2-bin & libphobos2-bin

Hi, Fixed. :) Removed. Thx. - Alexander

Re: [aur-general] removal request: dmd2-bin & libphobos2-bin

On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 13:50:23 +0100 Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Removed, thank you. Excuse me, but forgot this one: * dmd2-complete-bin http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41377 Sincerely, Gour -- All living bodies subsist on food grains, which are produced from rains. Rains are produc

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > Allright, added a comment to each of the four packages, asking the > maintainers to remove the direct download link. > If they don't comply, we can consider removal of the packages. Hope this > helps. I think that the-incredible-machine-

Re: [aur-general] removal request: dmd2-bin & libphobos2-bin

Hi, Removed, thank you. -- Cordially,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] r8169

On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Jason St. John wrote: > I am requesting that AUR package r8169 ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44317 ) be removed. > > The r8169 package seems to have been created because of a bug in the > 2.6.36 kernel which has already been fixed, apparently. Note t

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] r8169

On 09/12/11 03:05, Jason St. John wrote: > I am requesting that AUR package r8169 ( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44317 ) be removed. Done.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

Allright, added a comment to each of the four packages, asking the maintainers to remove the direct download link. If they don't comply, we can consider removal of the packages. Hope this helps. -- Best regards,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Kwpolska wrote: > You did not quite understand.  Karol wants to drop packages with links > to abandonia, where you can download these games illegally.  The > packages you linked to force you to get the game files yourself. Oh yes, I absolutely don't mind *installer

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > In that case, useful PKGBUILDS for other games that also can be > purchased should be deleted too: +1 and I would like to have an official rule saying this. > Or in fact every PKGBUILD with "commercial" license. > If only we had a licens

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Alexander Rødseth wrote: > In that case, useful PKGBUILDS for other games that also can be > purchased should be deleted too: > > Humble bundle: > * aquaria-hb_version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37013 > * chocolate-castle https://aur.archlinux.org/pac

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

In that case, useful PKGBUILDS for other games that also can be purchased should be deleted too: Humble bundle: * aquaria-hb_version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37013 * chocolate-castle https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=53880 * hammerfight https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.p

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Karol Blazewicz wrote: > There was a discussion about Abandonware in the AUR [1] but it seems > nothing much came out of it. [...] > [1] > http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-October/016268.htmltt > [2] https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pi

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: qgoogletranslator

On 05.12.2011 21:22, karnath wrote: >> If you plan to use suspended project, you're welcome. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski Arch Linux Trusted User http://archlinux.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: qgoogletranslator

On 5 December 2011 20:22, karnath wrote: > It does work; I'm using it now. > > Can someone put it back or should I re-submit it and have the > votes/comments put back on it afterwards? > > Jonathan In general, how is it that a working, recently updated package which is owned by an active member g

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: qgoogletranslator

In gmane.linux.arch.tur.user, you wrote: > It does work; I'm using it now. > > Can someone put it back or should I re-submit it and have the > votes/comments put back on it afterwards? > > Jonathan > You may use may last qgoogletranslate [1] and qgoogletranslate-svn [2] PKGBUILD's since i maintei

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: qgoogletranslator

On 5 December 2011 16:33, Kwpolska wrote: > On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Jonathan Steel wrote: >> 2011/12/2 Bartłomiej Piotrowski : >>> On 02.12.2011 16:24, karnath wrote: Hello. Please, remove  bunch of qgoogletranslator  packages [1] [2]  [3], since google suspended Goog

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: qgoogletranslator

On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Jonathan Steel wrote: > 2011/12/2 Bartłomiej Piotrowski : >> On 02.12.2011 16:24, karnath wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> Please, remove  bunch of qgoogletranslator  packages [1] [2]  [3], since >>> google suspended Google Translate APIv1 [4] and project is closed. >>> >

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: qgoogletranslator

2011/12/2 Bartłomiej Piotrowski : > On 02.12.2011 16:24, karnath wrote: >> Hello. >> >> Please, remove  bunch of qgoogletranslator  packages [1] [2]  [3], since >> google suspended Google Translate APIv1 [4] and project is closed. >> >> [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41005 >> [2]: ht

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: qgoogletranslator

On 02.12.2011 16:24, karnath wrote: > Hello. > > Please, remove bunch of qgoogletranslator packages [1] [2] [3], since > google suspended Google Translate APIv1 [4] and project is closed. > > [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=41005 > [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: bin32-google-earth

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Det wrote: > Hey, > > Google now offers 64-bit binaries for Google Earth so the > outdated/deprecated 'bin32-google-earth' can finally be removed: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=12890 Removed. Thanks! -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net

Re: [aur-general] removal request.

On 27/11/11 23:56, Nico Nell wrote: > Hello, > > I maintain several python packages that look like they won't have > python3 support anytime in the near future. I have updated these > package names to reflect only python 2 support. > > I would like to have the following packages (that I maintain)

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: thunderbird-branded

On 27/11/11 01:02, Jonathan Steel wrote: > On 26 November 2011 22:53, Evangelos Foutras wrote: >> On 27/11/11 00:41, Jonathan Steel wrote: >>> Thunderbird in extra is branded. >>> >>> thunderbird-branded >>> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10598 >>> >>> thunderbird-branded-bin >>> https:

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: thunderbird-branded

On 26 November 2011 22:53, Evangelos Foutras wrote: > On 27/11/11 00:41, Jonathan Steel wrote: >> Thunderbird in extra is branded. >> >> thunderbird-branded >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10598 >> >> thunderbird-branded-bin >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32906 > > Remov

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: thunderbird-branded

On 27/11/11 00:41, Jonathan Steel wrote: > Thunderbird in extra is branded. > > thunderbird-branded > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10598 > > thunderbird-branded-bin > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32906 Removed, thank you.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011/11/26 Χρῆστος Νούσκας (Christos Nouskas) : > Please remove my squid3 package > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40520) as squid in extra has bumped > to v3. Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: darktable-no-gconf

Done. Bartłomiej Piotrowski

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: boo

On 11/21/2011 12:18 AM, Tasos Latsas wrote: > Hello, > > boo already in extra > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=25365 > Done

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: netcfg-tray

Removed. Bartłomiej Piotrowski signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On 13.11.2011 11:17, Axilleas P wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:02 PM, wrote: >> hi, >> could you please delete the packages clucene-old and sword-old. They >> were both help packages for a third package of mine, because the >> Arch-Version of clucene didn't work together with my third packag

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:02 PM, wrote: > hi, > could you please delete the packages clucene-old and sword-old. They > were both help packages for a third package of mine, because the > Arch-Version of clucene didn't work together with my third package > (bibletime) until the newest release. So

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

Done. Bartłomiej Piotrowski

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - visibility-git

git clone git://code.l3ib.org/visibility.git works fine for me. the website is dead, but l3ib.org still online. --- El jue 10-nov-11, Jonathan Steel escribió: > De: Jonathan Steel > Asunto: [aur-general] Removal request - visibility-git > A: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)" >

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - grnotify

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:31 PM, Jonathan Steel wrote: > grnotify hasn't been updated in 3 years (at least the stable version; > SVN over a year ago) and it doesn't work with python2. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15313 > removed

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - gpacman

Removed. Thank you. -- Cordially,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Nicola Bignami wrote: > Please remove the foo2hp orphan package > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=15009 > > The foo2zjs package is maintained and supply the same functionalities. > target destroyed

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 11/05/2011 11:23 AM, Thomas Dziedzic wrote: On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Shaika-Dzari wrote: Hi everyone, Could you delete these packages please : https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=Shaika-Dzari&SeB=m These are my old projects. I'm not working on them anymore and they can't be b

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Shaika-Dzari wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Could you delete these packages please : > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=Shaika-Dzari&SeB=m > > These are my old projects. I'm not working on them anymore and they can't > be build with current Qt. > > Thanks > >

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 04/11/11 18:17, Max Roder wrote: Please remove perl-lib-base [1]. According to the maintainer's comment, it's part of perl's core now and should be deleted therefore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=47537 Done! -- Jelle van der Waa

Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] debootstrap-ubuntu

On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:12:21 +0100 sputnick wrote: > Hi, > > I'm the maintener of debootstrap-ubuntu. > > There's no real differences between debootstrapand debootstrap-ubuntu > so please, remove it. > > Thanks, > ++sputnick; Done, please provide a link next time you send a request. ;-) --

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - freedink-engine

Hi, Thanks for noticing. freedink duplicates freedink-engine, as freedink-engine was submitted first. Removed freedink. -- Cordially,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

Done. Thanks. Bartłomiej Piotrowski

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] racer-3d

Hi Stefan, I tried the old version of racer-3d, but it didn't work properly on my computer (garbled 3d graphics). While keeping the old package in AUR could be an idea (since someone will probably submit it anyhow), I agree with what you're saying. It would seem counterproductive and non-arch/kis

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - mupen64

On 01/11/11 00:07, Jonathan Steel wrote: Not been updated in over 6 years and superseded by mupen64plus. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1169 Removed! -- Jelle van der Waa

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - tint

On 01/11/11 00:02, Jonathan Steel wrote: Renamed to tint2 in 2009. This is an old version. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40739 Removed! -- Jelle van der Waa

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - fceux-nogui

It states in the README-SDL file: ... You can disable it (GTK) at run-time by passing the --nogui 1 option, or disable it build time by setting GTK to 0 in the SConstruct file.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request - fceux-nogui

On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Jonathan Steel wrote: > Obsolete; as of the latest version you can now compile with --nogui. > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38760 According to the comment on the AUR page, the latest version can be *run* with --nogui and doesn't need to be recompiled. But, thi

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] racer-3d

> 2011/10/31 Alexander Rødseth : > Hi, > > If you write a note in the comments and orhpan the package, perhaps > someone else wants to give it a shot? > I do understand your concern, though. > > Best regards, >   Alexander Rødseth > Alex, We could, of course; provide the outdated library in the A

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] racer-3d

Hi, If you write a note in the comments and orhpan the package, perhaps someone else wants to give it a shot? I do understand your concern, though. Best regards, Alexander Rødseth

Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] rinse

On 30/10/11 20:35, Michael Manley wrote: > Although I'm not the maintainer or original submitter, I'd ask for rinse to > be removed. The package hasn't been maintained since 2009, flagged out of > date, and the comments are from 2011 asking for updates and the maintainer > or submitter has not resp

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Simon Perry wrote: > Please remove perl-icontrol. Author has renamed the module and re-based > the version (I have a new PKGBUILD ready). Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: onscripter-en-svn & ponscripter-en

Done. Bartłomiej Piotrowski

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: pidgin-knotify

Thank you 2011/10/17 Evangelos Foutras : > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Jan Böhringer wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm the maintainer of pidgin-knotify( >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32919 ) in the AUR and i > > Removed. :) >

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: pidgin-knotify

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Jan Böhringer wrote: > Hello, > I'm the maintainer of pidgin-knotify( > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=32919 ) in the AUR and i Removed. :)

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (spring-framework-doc)

Done, thanks. Bartłomiej Piotrowski

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 10/15/2011 12:29 PM, foalsrock wrote: > Hello, I'm the maintainer of the following packages which became outdated > with Gnome 3.2 release and have not been updated since. > > gnome-shell-extension-arrow-key-window-selector-git: > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50646 > gnome-shell-ex

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: 3 unused python2-xy-* packages

Done. Bartłomiej Piotrowski

Re: [aur-general] Removal request: lsd-svn

Hi, Thank you. Removed. -- Cordially,  Alexander Rødseth  Arch Linux Trusted User  (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:38 PM, H.Gökhan Sarı wrote: > Hello, > > Can you please remove my package bluemarine* because there is no such > application anymore. > > Thanks, > > [0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33302 > > -- > H.Gökhan Sarı > th...@returnfalse.net > Done and thanks.

Re: [aur-general] [removal request] synaptiks-tray-icon

2011/10/8 Alexander Rødseth : > Hi, > > Removed. Thanks :)

Re: [aur-general] [removal request] synaptiks-tray-icon

Hi, Removed. -- Cordially,    Alexander Rødseth    (xyproto on IRC, trontonic on AUR)

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On 05/10/11 11:09, Petr Kovář wrote: Please remove package scantailor-cli-git. This feature was merged into master branch. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46622 Done! -- Jelle van der Waa

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Max Roder wrote: > Hi, > > rafael ff1 wrote on 09/28/2011 04:12 PM: > >> It seems that the requester is the maintainer. >> >> IMHO, if the package can't be updated to newer version with python >> support, should not be flagged as out-of-date. > > You're absolutly

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

Hi, rafael ff1 wrote on 09/28/2011 04:12 PM: > It seems that the requester is the maintainer. > > IMHO, if the package can't be updated to newer version with python > support, should not be flagged as out-of-date. You're absolutly right. I am the maintainer (sorry, forgot to mention that) and t

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

2011/9/28 Thomas Dziedzic : > On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Max Roder wrote: >> Hi, >> >> please remove python-libchamplain >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40969 >> >> It was needed by kismon only, but is not anymore. As 0.6.1, the latest >> version supporting python is outdated

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Max Roder wrote: > Hi, > > please remove python-libchamplain > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40969 > > It was needed by kismon only, but is not anymore. As 0.6.1, the latest > version supporting python is outdated and pretty old (0.12 is out), it > sh

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 4:28 AM, Pierre Bourdon wrote: > Hi, > > The package "minted" [1] does not build and minted.sty is actually > provided by texlive-latexextra. Deleted, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 09/23/2011 02:07 PM, Antonis Kouliakiotis wrote: > Please remove nnotes-git [1]. The project has been renamed to 'notably' so I > submitted a new package by that name [2] > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52091 > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=52534 Done!

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for `camlmix`

On 16 September 2011 15:01, Sergei Lebedev wrote: > One more removal request -- `camlmix` [*] this time. I've addopted the > package and renamed it to `ocaml-camlmix`, to mach OCaml Packaging > Guideline. > > Thanks! > > [*] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18885 > Done.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request for `ocaml-compiler-libs`

On 16/09/11 12:48, Sergei Lebedev wrote: > Can you please remove `ocaml-compiler-libs` [1] from AUR? Yup, removed.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

Hey, Stefan Husmann schrieb am 09/08/2011 07:57 PM: >> Max Roder wrote on 08/31/2011 10:00 PM: >> >> don't want to be annyoing - but maybe this (see above) did not reach >> the list? Please let me know about anything wrong with it, if so. >> > sometimes things get lost, even on a mailing list read

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

Am 08.09.2011 18:09, schrieb Max Roder: Max Roder wrote on 08/31/2011 10:00 PM: Hi, aircrack-ptw [1] can safly be removed. The ptw method is included in aircrack-ng. Aircrack-ptw is unmaintained for years now. In addition, it's not available on the official homepage anymore. Just clicked throu

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

Am 08.09.2011 19:44, schrieb Krzysztof Raczkowski: Following packages are old and not maintained: kadu-beta1 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36442 kadu-beta2 - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37741 kadu-light - http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=9701 These packages are

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

Max Roder wrote on 08/31/2011 10:00 PM: > Hi, > > aircrack-ptw [1] can safly be removed. The ptw method is included in > aircrack-ng. Aircrack-ptw is unmaintained for years now. In addition, > it's not available on the official homepage anymore. > > Just clicked through all those madwifi packages

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Thursday, September 08, 2011 09:49:20 AM Jakob Gruber wrote: > mpy and mpy-git seem to already have been removed. He sent the request twice: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2011-September/015781.html -- Andrea

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 09/08/2011 04:58 AM, Cyker Way wrote: > Please remove mpy and mpy-git. Due to name conflicts on PyPI, they have been > renamed as ncmpy and ncmpy-git. Thanks! > mpy and mpy-git seem to already have been removed.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request (ptscotch)

On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Michele Mocciola wrote: > Please, remove ptscotch package > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23389), it's a duplicate of > ptscotch-mpich2. Removed, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:10 PM, Max Roder wrote: > Hi, > > I think airoscript-svn [1] can safely be removed, as the svn repository > is empty and [2] provides the current version. Deleted, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Max Roder wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > I think fbsplash-uswsusp [1] should be deleted, as uswsusp-fbsplash [2] > provides the same and is up-to-date. Deleted, thanks. Also, please consider using PGP/MIME instead of putting

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:00 AM, Jamie Nguyen wrote: > Please can the following packages by removed from the AUR (all of > which are now orphans and all of which were previously my own): > > kernel26-ccs http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44131 >  ==> replaced by linux-ccs Deleted; votes an

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

Am 10.08.2011 22:37, schrieb gadget3000: mpd-pulse (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18722) is deprecated as mpd in [extra] has pulseaudio support built in. I checked this myself by following the instructions here: http://mpd.wikia.com/wiki/PulseAudio#Setting_up_MPD and 'pulse' was indeed

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 5:42 PM, gadget3000 wrote: > freedoko-bin32 (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=29644). It exists > as freedoko > (http://aur.archlinux.org/packagesreson.php?.php?ID=15705) > and I can't find a reason for a 32-bit only

Re: [aur-general] Removal request kernel26-selinux

On 08/16/2011 11:01 PM, Nicky726 wrote: > Hello, TUs, as the maintainer of kernel26-selinux [1] I ask for its removal, > as it has been made obsolete by linux-selinux [2]. May this also serve as a > notice to the users who do not subscribe to package comments. > > [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/pac

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, gadget3000 wrote: > theforgottenserver-svn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21881) The > svn repository is no longer available to the public (Source: > http://otland.net/f55/moved-private-subversion-11833/). There used to be a > public repository at "http://svn.otland.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On Sun, 14 Aug 2011, gadget3000 wrote: > tux-ragnarok-full (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34062) - Dead > multiplayer project. Dead source link and I can't find a mirror. 3 votes and > hasn't been updated since Feb 2010. No maintainer. Agreed - deleted. Pete.

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:20 PM, gadget3000 wrote: > glest-tileset-autumn (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21791) is > included in megaglest which is in [community] (Source: > http://www.titusgames.de/news.html#tilesets) > Done & thank you!

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 6:23 PM, gadget3000 wrote: > tecnoballz-snapshot (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=4377) has been > replaced by tecnoballz (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45077) Removed, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On 12.08.2011 21:10, A Rojas wrote: > please remove nepomukcontroller > http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=45131 as it is included in KDE > 4.7 removed -- Florian Pritz signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:32 PM, gadget3000 wrote: > Please remove kernel26-sony (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49563) > because linux-sony (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=51456) replaces > it. Done, thanks.

Re: [aur-general] Removal request

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Bogdan Ionuț wrote: > kernel26-bfs ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36384 ) has been > replaced by linux-bfs ( https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50934 ) > > thanks in advance. > done

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On 08/10/2011 10:30 PM, gadget3000 wrote: splashy (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=10211) has been replaced by splashy-full. Subsequently it has no maintainer and hasn't been updated since August 09. Done! -- Jelle van der Waa

Re: [aur-general] Removal Request

On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Luca Bennati wrote: > warzone-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8384 since upstream > doesn't use SVN anymore Removed, thanks.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >