On 21/07/27 13:17, Archange wrote:
> systemd is not part of base-devel, and base is not part of official building
> chroots (they were reasons for this, but I don’t remember them at the
> moment).
If you remind yourself please let us know.
> Also, I would still keep base content in dependencies (w
Hello,
> The most important meta package is base. It contains a minimal package
> set that defines a basic Arch Linux installation. It includes:
Without base you wouldn't be building the package on a system that can
be called Arch Linux. What's the point then?
Regards,
Marcin Wieczorek
On 21/07
> yes, you are right, there is only the sum currently, and the signature is not
> checked.
> thanks for mentioning that is could be done in prepare().
> I could not find a way to do checks before extraction, since prepare() is
> only after extraction (not required for checking the archives).
>
>
Hi,
On 21/07/22 09:38, Jude DaShiell via aur-general wrote:
> In the case where /dev/sda is selected for installation and an installer
> chooses to format the whole disk and install a basic partition system on
> the disk and any other data is already on the disk archinstall errors out.
> In this c
On 21/07/22 14:54, pcb-...@cuvoodoo.info wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 02:45:38PM +0200, Marcin Wieczorek wrote:
> > Also I noticed that the signatures are broken (0 byte files). I don't
> > think it even is PGP. In case you ever contact the upstream make sure to
> > mention this and the fact th
> I did not know you don't need to add 'provide' if the name is the same as the
> package.
> thanks for pointing it out, I'll remove them in the non-svg packages
provides: An array of additional packages that the software provides the
features of.
The package itself cannot be "additional". At lea
Hi,
the attachments are good now.
> # Maintainer: CuVoodoo
> pkgname=camv-rnd
> pkgver=1.0.0
> pkgrel=1
> pkgdesc="free/open source, small, flexible viewer for PCB-related CAM file
> formats"
> url="http://www.repo.hu/projects/camv-rnd/";
> arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
> license=('GPL2')
> depends=('
Hi,
On 21/07/22 14:15, pcb-rnd--- via aur-general wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I would like to have some feedback for my first PKGBUILD files for packages.
> the existing pcb-rnd-svn AUR package is currently broken because the project
> requires a need dependency: librnd3.
> thus I decided to create al
On 20/12/30 13:41, Morten Linderud via aur-general wrote:
> User deleted their account which deleted the packages.
I would expect the packages to be orphaned, I didn't know they get
deleted. Anyways one can bring them back to life by cloning and pushing
even if a package doesn't exist in aurweb.
