Hi,
I came across the following packages purely by chance.
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=cachy-browser-firefox-shim
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=librewolf-firefox-shim
Should I submit a deletion request? IMO it's strange to build a package
just
123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12
On Wed, 2023-09-27 at 04:18 +, a...@nullvoid.me wrote:
> For packages that may be immoral but legal, such as a package that
> changes everything to racial slurs, sexist, or vulgar language.
> I think it also should stay
On Tue, 2023-09-26 at 21:23 +0200, Robin Candau wrote:
> However, I don't think it's fine having "Minecraft-cracked" AUR package,
> not because of the (not) redistributing part but because of ethically of
> letting/allowing a **clearly** illegal package on the AUR.
Hi,
in the case of a
On Mon, 2023-09-04 at 23:16 +0100, Polarian wrote:
>On Mon, 2023-09-04 at 12:20 -0700, Xavier Baez wrote:
> > I would like to know what the rules are, today at Labor Day 3 AM the change
> > requests arrive again, yesterday I had to leave church to come home and do
> > more changes Test the
On Sat, 2023-07-29 at 15:45 +, james smith wrote:
> trying to build this https://github.com/matthewq337/auto-fdisk
> https://bpa.st/H6XQ
Hi,
your PKGBUILD expects
...src/auto-fdisk.sh-source.r12.1712784/auto-fdisk.sh
but the correct path and the filename seem to be different
On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 10:53 -0400, 2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com
wrote:
> We could argue the merits of static vs. dynamic linking, but neither of
> us is an expert, so that argument would likely be sub-optimal. ;-)
That's incorrect. Everybody is an expert. It's possible to audit a
single
On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 15:24 +0100, Polarian wrote:
> So I don't find the entire "Oh the library can be replaced with a
> malicious one" to be a good reason.
At least the one and only shared library needs to be replaced, a task
that isn't that easy to do, while the 300 outdated libraries of
On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 08:15 +, paul.mirkwood wrote:
> I'm not sure whether this is intended as a joke
Hi,
my apologies for the bad satire.
Is there a rational for naming packages "golang-golang-"* ?
Probably naming packages just "go-"* is suboptimal, but actually the
language is called "Go"
On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 09:27 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> "C" is just a letter of the alphabet
and/or a hex numeral system number :D.
A
B https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B_(programming_language)
C
On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 03:47 +0100, Polarian wrote:
> go was just its shortened name but its
> a verb so can be confused when using it as a noun.
"C" is just a letter of the alphabet ;), much likely nobody using Arch
Linux does confuse the letter of the alphabet with the programming
language,
On Sun, 2023-06-18 at 08:55 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> faked pseudo-Asian
My apologies for the "double negative"/"tautology".
I must have been a little emotional after reading package names starting
with "extra/golang-golang-".
Hi,
when doing a command line package search for "go" it returns many
unrelated packages, such as
extra/evolution-bogofilter 3.48.3-1
Spam filtering for Evolution, using Bogofilter
so there is a point in using "golang". OTOH, when I look at the naming
scheme of the Go packages
On Sat, 2023-06-17 at 21:11 -0400, Tom Swartz wrote:
> Holy smokes that's racist as hell.
Again, it's not part of my vocabulary! In addition it is very difficult
to be more misanthropic than Google!
On Sat, 2023-06-17 at 21:11 -0400, Tom Swartz wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2023, 21:04 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > "To me "golang"
> > sounds similar to "ching chang chong",
>
>
> Holy smokes that's racist as hell.
>
> Mods?
>
Hi.
as
PS:
"It is often referred to as Golang because of its former domain name,
golang.org, but its proper name is Go." -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_(programming_language)
On Sat, 2023-06-17 at 21:57 +0100, Polarian wrote:
> The naming for go packages seems inconsistent, I can see both go-* and
> golang-*
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Go_(programming_language)#/media/File:Go_Logo_Blue.svg
Nobody says "Englishlang", "Germanlang" or "C++lang". To me "golang"
sounds
Hi,
to my knowledge, if it's for an explicit branch, that doesn't change,
you bump pkgrel, to build against updated dependencies.
If you provide a package building the last commit, you usually don't do
anything. If a user does build the package, pkgver does change
automatically. It's an
On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 11:29:03 +0100, Michael Kogan via aur-general wrote:
>Thanks, guys! Everything is still functional with yay as it seems.
Hooray, yaourt has risen...
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 21:12:59 -0800, Kevin Morris via aur-general wrote:
>Regarding `/rpc.php`, we will continue to support this
Today we take farewell of yaourt.
Some of us remained steadfastly at yaourt's side, while it became old.
It was a good friend.
Until yesterday some of us used the manual build process, but in
addition we checked the aur for updates and searched for software using
yaourt and quite often we even
Last March I increased my power bill, since from running makepkg to
electron9-9.4.4-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst by building from source > 19 hours
passed.
If users need bloadware that is already available by official
repositories, but they need another version or the same version with
different build
1. important to me are 4.19 rt patched kernels
2. however, IIRC the modules for the 5+ kernels were missing, too, but
I might be mistaken
3. I'm building 4.19 rt patched kernels myself, but install "linux"
from official repositories, too
4.
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ pacman -Q linux
linux
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 12:17:10 -0600, David C. Rankin wrote:
>Passed along to the vbox-users-commun...@lists.sourceforge.net list
Thank you David :).
I'm not subscribed. Actually I tend to migrate to QEMU/KVM after I have
done my very first test, https://i.imgur.com/xUjIoa4.png . OTOH
VirtualBox
Hi,
I have to work, so there's no time to check log files before the
weekend and I couldn't find something related at
https://bugs.archlinux.org/
or https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/virtualbox-bin/ . However, maybe
somebody noticed this, too.
I build and installed virtualbox-bin 6.1.30-1 from
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 23:57:19 +0300, Radislav Golubtsov wrote:
>[1] http://dist.schmorp.de
Perhaps just a temporarily unavailability?
[rocketmouse@archlinux rxvt]$ wget
http://dist.schmorp.de/rxvt-unicode/rxvt-unicode-9.26.tar.bz2{,.sig}
--2021-08-25 03:03:57--
retrieve a package's metadata without parsing the PKGBUILD directly."
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/.SRCINFO
On Sat, 31 Jul 2021 12:39:59 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>the very first thing to do by yourself [...] is trying to build without
>an AUR helper.
https://lists.archlinux.org/pip
On Sun, 1 Aug 2021 17:20:01 +0200, Peter Nabbefeld wrote:
>I've tried to use aura, but same problems. PKGBUILD
>(https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=meshroom-git)
>does not contain any dependency on alembic-qfix, so it's probably a
>repository/versioning problem.
Hi,
I've
Hi,
it might not be related to your issue, however, when updating AUR
packages, an AUR helper might build packages in lexical order, but not
in the order they need to be build.
For example, there might be an update for a-foo and b-bar. Since b-bar
is a dependency of a-foo, there's the need to
On Tue, 25 May 2021 19:04:33 +0200, alad via aur-general wrote:
>https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2021-May/036236.html
"The Arch Linux project does not distribute your software."
Probably hairsplitting, but in some kind of way it does.
Anyway, IMHO this isn't the point.
Word
On Tue, 25 May 2021 13:27:07 -0400, Manhong Dai via aur-general wrote:
>I beg to differ, as 'trivial' is subjective.
In an ideal world nobody would care about vanity, glory and/or
money and all would be happy, if intellectual property would be
completely unimportant. Often the wording of a law
On Fri, 21 May 2021 13:48:49 -0400, Manhong Dai wrote:
>That being said, I always hope AUR can have as little conflicts like
>this as possible, so I can continuously benefit from Arch Linux.
In my experiences most of the AUR is without problems, a benefit for
all of us.
We are all humans and the
On Fri, 21 May 2021 19:10:57 +0200, ente wrote:
>Oh, sorry to say Ralf: in any scenario you should never again consider
>to write a song! That song is horrible!
:D
While I have to agree that my analogy doesn't work perfectly, this part
of the analogy does a good job.
You and I probably agree,
On Fri, 21 May 2021 12:37:05 -0400, Manhong Dai wrote:
>I still think even 'sensible modifications' is still a modification,
>especially if the original author has an issue with it.
Yesno ;)! There are GPL vs BSD license disputes for no good reasons.
How Pooterish can we go? As long as the world
Hi Manhong,
it's squishy to form an opinion related to violation of a
license and toleration of sensible modifications and sometimes even to
distinguish between theft and fortuitousness.
If you wrote a song named "love song" composed of holding the note c for
1000 beats and after that holding
>Did you sent it off-list on purpose?
Oops, tricky, one of the recipient send "via aur-general".
Pardon, I missed that. So it wasn't offlist.
On Mon, 17 May 2021 23:50:51 +0300, Pasha Finkelshtein wrote:
>When my children are running around and laughing my peers almost can't
>hear them.
>
>This is enough for me to say that this software is useful.
Ok! Without this software, it would be an issue? IOW did you compare
the result with and
On Mon, 2021-05-17 at 22:23 +0200, Markus Schaaf via aur-general wrote:
> Danke fürs Corn-Poppen! :-)
Hi,
please, don't consider my 2 cents as bikeshedding.
"Make sure the package you want to upload is useful." -
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submission
I
On Mon, 17 May 2021 20:38:33 +0200, Justin Kromlinger via aur-general
wrote:
>I've switched the PKGBUILD to a VCS source and removed any source code
>modifications [0]. It should now be compliant with the license and the
>wishes of the upstream maintainer.
>
>[0]
Apart of whatever noise reduction is used, the possible full gated
(mute) part of this app IMO is a no-go for communication.
In (e.g. music) audio engineering this kind of gate can be used to some
degree, but if you've ever talked with somebody who's phone used this
kind of gate approach, you'll
On Wed, 12 May 2021 12:07:49 +0200, fredbezies via aur-general wrote:
>I saw that packages meant for Manjaro or another archlinux based
>distro - not ArchLinux itself - were removed.
Were they removed because they were Manjaro related or for some other
reason?
"FAQ
What kind of packages are
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:41:09 -0500, Doug Newgard wrote:
>https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/70261
Thank you, working around the xz issue solved the problem. Ralf
Hi,
I don't understand why something that worked a short while back, doesn't
work anymore.
$ makepkg -s
==> Making package: linux-rt-pussytoes 4.19.184_rt75-0.300 (Sun 11 Apr 2021
15:52:17 CEST)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==>
://aur.archlinux.org/packages/electron9/#pinned-795189 .
Btw. consider to verify, if this package is needed at all by your
install, see:
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 23:26:44 +0100
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: Kunda, erfanmola, jonathon
Subject: [AUR] electron9
Hi,
[snip]
To list packages
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 17:22:26 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 14:44:57 +, Jonathon Fernyhough via aur-general
>wrote:
>>On 28/02/2021 04:45, Ralf Mardorf via aur-general wrote:
>>> It might be unnecessary to build "the single `hugo` binary",
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 14:44:57 +, Jonathon Fernyhough via aur-general
wrote:
>On 28/02/2021 04:45, Ralf Mardorf via aur-general wrote:
>> It might be unnecessary to build "the single `hugo` binary", but it's
>> sort of necessary to build a package, at least if you pr
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 01:20:49 +, Jonathon Fernyhough wrote:
>On 27/02/2021 12:42, Kr1ss via aur-general wrote:
>> On the other hand, why not just build it locally, and forego
>> uploading it to the AUR ?
>
>It's not even necessary to build it - download the single `hugo` binary
>from the
ers not necessarily
include 0.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0#Mathematics
[1]
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:09:42 +0100
From: Ralf Mardorf
To: aur-general@lists.archlinux.org
Subject: [off-topic][ansible-aur] call for comment on pull request 50
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:03
On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 12:03:12 +0100, Roland Puntaier wrote:
>>On 1/23/21 1:31 PM, Roland Puntaier via aur-general wrote:
>>>mathematics allows 0.
>0 is a number like every other.
Yesno
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_number
47 matches
Mail list logo
