Request #57904 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]:
we'll merge the packages in the opposite way, when @altermetax will
adopt the eclipse-cpp-bin package
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/
On 17/03/24 00:45, Marcell Meszaros wrote:
Mattia, please kindly use bottom-posting style instead of top-positing.
On 16 March 2024 23:05:54 GMT+01:00, Mattia Moffa wrote:
Please, note that it has already been decided multiple times by trusted users
that Eclipse packages should not include t
Please, note that it has already been decided multiple times by trusted users
that Eclipse packages should not include the -bin suffix. The eclipse-java-bin
and the eclipse-jee-bin packages have been deleted in the past for the same
reason. Also, back when Eclipse was in the official repositori
Mattia, please kindly use bottom-posting style instead of top-positing.
On 16 March 2024 23:05:54 GMT+01:00, Mattia Moffa wrote:
>Please, note that it has already been decided multiple times by trusted users
>that Eclipse packages should not include the -bin suffix. The eclipse-java-bin
>and t
altermetax [1] filed a request to merge eclipse-cpp-bin [2] into
eclipse-cpp [3]:
- The eclipse-cpp-bin package seems unmaintained
- Both eclipse-cpp and eclipse-cpp-bin create the package from pre-
built artifacts, however as per the AUR submission guidelines Java
software shouldn't have the -bi
>altermetax [1] filed a request to merge eclipse-cpp-bin [2] into
>eclipse-cpp [3]:
>
>- The eclipse-cpp-bin package seems unmaintained
>- Both eclipse-cpp and eclipse-cpp-bin create the package from pre-
>built artifacts, however as per the AUR submission guidelines Java
>software shouldn't have t
altermetax [1] filed a request to merge eclipse-cpp-bin [2] into
eclipse-cpp [3]:
- The eclipse-cpp-bin package seems unmaintained
- Both eclipse-cpp and eclipse-cpp-bin create the package from pre-
built artifacts, however as per the AUR submission guidelines Java
software shouldn't have the -bin
