[Aus-soaring] volunteer editor

2003-12-17 Thread Emilis Prelgauskas
What we see comes from what we know. At 11:16 PM 16/12/03 +1030, Mark wrote: >If an edict came down tomorrow >which said that all the HGFA and AUF stuff had to completely disappear, >and the mag would become sailplanes only... >... who would step forward to replace the current editors? That fa

Re: [Aus-soaring] volunteer editor

2003-12-17 Thread Mark Newton
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 10:12:32AM +1030, Emilis Prelgauskas wrote: > At 11:16 PM 16/12/03 +1030, Mark wrote: > >If an edict came down tomorrow > >which said that all the HGFA and AUF stuff had to completely disappear, > >and the mag would become sailplanes only... > >... who would step forw

Re: [Aus-soaring] volunteer editor

2003-12-17 Thread Brian Wade
sday, December 18, 2003 10:28 AM Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] volunteer editor On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 10:12:32AM +1030, Emilis Prelgauskas wrote:  > At 11:16 PM 16/12/03 +1030, Mark wrote: > >If an edict came down tomorrow > >which said that all the HGFA and AU

Re: [Aus-soaring] volunteer editor

2003-12-18 Thread Dav
to dream) - Original Message - From: "Mark Newton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Discussion of issues relating to Soaring in Australia." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:58 AM Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] volunteer editor > Aus-soar

Re: [Aus-soaring] volunteer editor

2003-12-18 Thread Dav
2003 11:31 AM Subject: Re: [Aus-soaring] volunteer editor Mark said   "For what it's worth:  I actually see few problems with the quality, and enjoy reading the stuff about the other sports aviation disciplines presented in the magazine.  But maybe relatively n