>From: "Brian Wade" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Graeme - please see
>
>http://law.ato.gov.au/atolaw/view.htm?locid='TXR/TR9319/NAT/ATO#P79
>
>In particular para 78, which reads
>
>Licences
>78. Certain airline employees need to renew relevant business licences to
>maintain their employment and thus earn
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [aus-soaring] Rec License
> >From: "David Long &/or Cathy Lincoln" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >However, for motor vehicle licences your doctor is able to charge a
&g
Graeme - Change your Accountant quickly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Graeme Cant
Sent: Sunday, 23 June 2002 21:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Fw: [aus-soaring] Rec License
>From: "David Long &/or C
>From: "David Long &/or Cathy Lincoln" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>However, for motor vehicle licences your doctor is able to charge a
>Medicare
>rebate. Unlike any aviation medical they perform, DAME or not.
That's not the best of it, Dave. Not only is there no Medicare rebate, but
if you hold a p
On the form you fill in every ten years or so for a replacement driving
licence it asks if you have any medical conditions or take any
medication. If so, you need to go to your family doctor for a medical.
However, for motor vehicle licences your doctor is able to charge a Medicare
rebate. Unlik
rday, June 22, 2002 1:50 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [aus-soaring] Rec License
> >From: "Peter Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >...I want the new licence except the medicals should be performed by your
> >family doctor and not a Designated Aviation Medical Officer a
>From: "Peter Stephenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>...I want the new licence except the medicals should be performed by your
>family doctor and not a Designated Aviation Medical Officer at $80+ a time.
Well, you're way out of line then on what the FAA think in the US and most
of the other countri
At 11:35 AM 21/06/02 +1000, you wrote:
>>From: Mike Borgelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>the question you should ask is: How is it that the GFA official response is
>>so out of kilter with the opinions expressed here?(Rhetorical question, I
>>know)
>
>No Mike! Really good question!. It's out of kilte
The GFA Executive are bound by Council policy and direction. If you want
to get this before council, you need to influence your Regions council
representatives. First round papers have closed so the second round will
have to be the forum, however this is not the usual way of introducing to
counc
me up with a simple system that would benefit Australian glider
> pilots. But for GFA not to enthusiastically and positively enter into
such
> a dialogue would be a mistake as far as the Caboolture "discussion group"
is
> concerned.
--
Brian Wade
Personal Computer Concepts
Un
Hi Caboolture Gliding Club listee,
There is a spirited argument on the aus-soaring list alluded to by Brian
Wade. The question is: do we want a Recreation Licence (gliders) managed
by CASA (government) or keep the status quo?. The GFA Executive want to
keep the status quo.
A majority of the
11 matches
Mail list logo
