And I suppose Warwick Hughes has it all right? If anyone has an agenda here
with a foregone conclusion it’s got to be him. Since well before 2005, when he
requested the IPCC data, he was bagging anything remotely green. No wonder they
didn’t want to give anything to him, they knew his agenda was
Anthony, the sample cs file I sent you shows how to do
Application.Run(formInstance) in a thread. It's surprisingly few lines of
code.
Greg
On 27 February 2010 11:54, Ian Thomas wrote:
> I just hate the inflammatory wording in that explanation of the Melbourne
> Water graph –
>
> “*What does this graph show?*
> Annual inflows into Melbourne's 4 major reservoirs since 1913. While ups
> and downs are a constant feature, the average h
If you have some code that would be great...haven't got huge experience with
threading
From: ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com
[mailto:ausdotnet-boun...@lists.codify.com] On Behalf Of James Chapman-Smith
Sent: Friday, 26 February 2010 11:03 PM
To: 'ausDotNet'
Subject: RE: Splash Screen..thread
I just hate the inflammatory wording in that explanation of the Melbourne
Water graph -
"What does this graph show?
Annual inflows into Melbourne's 4 major reservoirs since 1913. While ups and
downs are a constant feature, the average has dropped rapidly by almost 40%
in the past 12 years. This
Well that’s the hope. The hope is that that the ecosystem can somehow rebalance
itself in spite of the extra greenhouse gases injected into the system. On the
other side of this is the fear that the amount of carbon in the atmosphere is
now so great that the carbon sinks can’t accommodate the am
Hi Anthony,
The very first thing you should do is remove the "Application.DoEvents()"
calls. These are inherently bad and will cause all sorts of concurrency and
threading issues. You can end up with re-entrancy & stack overflows...
The best thing is to create the splash screen in its own A
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:41 PM, David Richards <
ausdot...@davidsuniverse.com> wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> Has anyone else noticed people often don't answer more than one
> question in an email? In fact, I'll generalise that and say people
> often don't read an entire email. I had this today (a
Something for an end of OT Friday:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clnozSXyF4k
Quite incredible how much mundane stuff you watch on TV is 90% fake. The
scenes from Ugly Betty are incredible. I guess footpath permits are damned
expensive to justify this.
--
David Connors (da...@codify.com)
Softwa
