Hi All,
The problem with the ‘device malware’ approach is also that if such an approach
is used where the intention is to target a single device and the software /
hardware vendor screws up and deploys the ‘weakened’ application to many
devices instead of one specific device then there is
Brendan,
Ill send you an email off list.
Brad
On Tue, 4 Sep. 2018, 10:00 Brendan Halley, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If anyone has a contact for Bigpond/Telstra mail server admins can you
> please contact me off list?
>
> Brendan
> ___
> AusNOG mailing list
Paul,
I can't agree. There appear to be specific protections under the bill that
prevent weakening of security - viz: 317ZG & 317ZH.
The internet has come to an important cross roads. It's no longer
acceptable to expect that privacy considerations are sufficient to justify
free reign for the
Hello,
If anyone has a contact for Bigpond/Telstra mail server admins can you
please contact me off list?
Brendan
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
Regardless of the ins and outs being discussed so far, our "Dear
Leaders" in the 5 eyes alliance were
already meeting to discuss taking it further in the past week or two.
This was a bit hidden as Australia took time out to roll yet another PM,
which was likely convenient
for some of the
3 - Also in this ideal world, this one government agency issuing the
warrant SSL
certificates, and collecting warrant data, would have it's DNS DNSSEC
signed ;)
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 16:56, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> Point taken that the point of insertion is inband as
Point taken that the point of insertion is inband as opposed to existing
procedures for wire taps.
1 - Having multiple agencies all requiring access (as the bill does) is
going to create a multitude of possible targets (m x n) to act as vectors.
This is clearly a vulnerability. An alternate
