I would submit that “I’m seeing potentially unusual network behaviour on the
interconnect between network A and network B, is anyone else seeing it” is
exactly what a network operators group is for.
From: AusNOG On Behalf Of Mitch Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 4:32 PM
To: Steve
We have a MLL down NSW south coast to Sydney, Telstra issue seems to be
between Deakin to SYD as reported... could be related.
On 6/2/2024 2:39 pm, Steve Dimitrio wrote:
Well done that’s right! Spoken to another guy who agrees
*From:*Nathan Brookfield
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:38
Well done that's right! Spoken to another guy who agrees
From: Nathan Brookfield
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:38 PM
To: Steve Dimitrio ; ausnog@lists.ausnog.net
Subject: RE: [AusNOG] AAPT latency
Looks like an issue with that path from Telstra Melbourne and how it touches
AAPT's network,
Looks like an issue with that path from Telstra Melbourne and how it touches
AAPT's network, I'm not seeing this from Sydney via Telstra.
4 ae25.alx-edge411.sydney.telstra.net (138.217.142.213) 0.286 ms 0.262 ms
0.240 ms
5 bundle-ether50.hay-core30.sydney.telstra.net (203.50.12.130) 1.939
Escalate it to your account manager.
This is not a Tech support channel :)
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 11:29 AM Steve Dimitrio
wrote:
> 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms
> Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229]
>
> 2 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms
>
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms
Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229]
2 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net
[203.50.11.113]
3 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net
[203.50.11.199]
That doesn't look bad, what are the next few hops?
From: AusNOG On Behalf Of Steve Dimitrio
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:18 PM
To: ausnog@lists.ausnog.net
Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency
1 2 ms 1 ms<1 ms
Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229]
1 2 ms 1 ms<1 ms
Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229]
2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net
[203.50.11.113]
3 4 ms 3 ms 1 ms bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net
[203.50.11.199]
These folk are putting out some grant money. We (libreqos) are very
interested in seeing what can be done to replace brittle policers, and
improve wireless long and short haul networks and would love to see
someone attempting an ISP or IXP sized deployment down there...
The way this was implemented is very frustrating. I assisted a few orgs
that, I had done consultancy for prior. But many out there are only just
now, going to notice and go WTF?
And these are not black and white, meaning that is you move into a
"compliant" state with regards to SPF, DKIM and blah
Google and Yahoo have implemented changes recently.
AWS's summary is here
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/messaging-and-targeting/an-overview-of-bulk-sender-changes-at-yahoo-gmail/
You're likely getting caught up in that.
D
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024, 5:52 pm Tim McCullagh, wrote:
> Sorry for the
11 matches
Mail list logo
