It’s a secret proxy ARP’d anycast’d BNG gateway.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 12:04, Karl Kloppenborg wrote:
> Just checking, it’s Friday yes?
>
>
>
> --Karl.
>
>
>
> *From: *AusNOG on behalf of Go Group -
> GEO Gurus
> *Date: *Friday, 16 February 2024 at 12:58 pm
> *To: *ausnog@lists.ausnog.net
>
Howdy,
If you unicast or multicast us some IP’s involved to test to there’s more
than a few folks around to help by providing diagnostics from their
networks point of view.
Equinix being a shared colo space, the servers you mention could be on
anyone’s network. Or, direct on an Equinix internet s
This has happened before.
Does @Megaport have filters/policers in place like other IX’s?
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 14:06, Stavros Patiniotis
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Does anyone have a sample pcap of the erroneous traffic seen from their
> port that they would be able to share?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* AusN
These were the micro OLT guys:
https://tibitcom.com
Good luck :)
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 at 03:31, Fernando Cassia wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020, 06:28 Mark Tees wrote:
>
>> It depends what your ultimate goal is? Just for play/learning etc or
>> other?
>>
&g
Thoughts? Comments? TIA...
> FC
> ___
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
--
Regards,
Mark Tees
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
___
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
--
Regards,
Mark Tees
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
Hey listers,
If anyone out there has experience with Siae ALFOplus 11Ghz radios
would mind dropping me a line?
Cheers,
Mark
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
Hi there,
Trying to track down who has fixed wireless kit on a building at 7
Prospect Terrace, Kelvin Grove QLD.
If that's you or you know who please unicast me.
It's in regards to a potential site service that has LOS to that site.
Cheers,
Mark
___
Sorted.
Thanks everyone who reached out.
On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 12:35, Mark Tees wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Can someone from Superloop NOC please unicast me?
>
> Trying to get details for a customers transit service and normal
> methods so far have failed.
>
> Thanks,
>
&g
Hey,
Can someone from Superloop NOC please unicast me?
Trying to get details for a customers transit service and normal
methods so far have failed.
Thanks,
Mark
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/a
Sounds like a power surge took out a bunch of stuff.
On Sun, 26 May 2019 at 20:52, Warren Bold | Polyfone Telecom Pty Ltd <
wb...@polyfone.com.au> wrote:
> The Frontier notes for those who can't see it.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Warren Bold
> --
> *From:* AusNOG on
On 23 May 2018 at 08:36, Brenden Cruikshank wrote:
> On the other hand we have a legacy Telstra frame relay service, it’s had
> 100% uptime for as long as I can remember. Old technology just seems so much
> more reliable.
Well, I am just guessing here so please feel free to correct me but
Frame r
cked
> around as a proof of concept for a few use cases.
>
>
> Diversion of incoming calls to a SIP endpoint, and SMSes to email, using
> their service is definitely possible.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> -Brad.
>
>
> ------
> *From:* AusN
I am kind of wondering if we can get to a stage of complete number
virtualisation. Mainly so when I’m overseas I can more easily direct actual
inbound SMS how I see fit. Have also had the same number for almost 10
years. At present I hook up an Android phone and send/receive SMS via
email or forwa
Looks better than the vast majority of pitts?
Looks like this
https://www.netcommwireless.com/what-we-do/network-terminating-devices/fibre-distribution-point-fttdp
Still way better than VDSL over 400m of copper.
On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 at 05:49, Sam McLeod wrote:
> Pretty disgraceful: https://i.im
Not sure about Global Switch but from memory power at Equinix (at least in
some parts of SY1/2) goes customer feed primary -> big STS -> UPS A/B ->
ATS -> grid power or genset.
Same for customer secondary feed but via different STS/UPS.
You could see the large transfer switches on SY1 floor I thi
Can you do some tests to a VM on a directly peered network?
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 14:37, Dino Sosic wrote:
> Indeed, the law of BGP as such. However, such a huge drop would point to
> something being problematic IMO, especially towards multiple destinations
>
>
>
> *From:* Mark Smith [mailto:ma
There is a pretty extensive document from TW that describes all the tagging
actions. There is also a follow up describing redundant head ports and new
double tagging options.
Because it is such a PITA to change after the fact I prefer to have it
tagged from the get-go with a standard VID.
On Thu,
Agree. And, build your network to be able to cope with link flaps as best
you can.
MP are super convenient and great to deal with in my experience.
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 at 10:19, Matt Perkins wrote:
>
>
> *can not relay on theses guys any more. *
> I think that's a bit harsh. Everyone has proble
STP is probably not a good fit for this.
On the carrier side it can be done with redundant PW and VPLS multi-homing
etc etc. Telstra Wholesale just notified me about that exact setup for
Ethernet access.
Then on the customer side you could just have a dynamic routing protocol or
other mechanism w
Agree, But what's the need for VRF for that? Address space/RFC1918?
On 25 May 2017 at 20:50, Nathan Brookfield
wrote:
> VRF's with BGP running lower timers and you'll never look back, very
> reliable, fairly easy to implement even with your primary connection on
> PPPoE and the other on a routed
.billion.com/downloads/datasheet/wireless/Billion-BiPAC-8920nz-Datasheet.pdf
- Supports OpenVPN, GRE, IPSEC, L2TP
- Only RIP for dynamic routing ;)
- Solid IPv6 support
- around $700
Cheers,
Mark
On 22 May 2017 at 12:42, Mark Tees wrote:
> Morning everybody,
>
> I was wondering what pe
it was
> pretty reliable.
>
> https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=KB26116
>
>
>
>
> On 22/05/2017 12:42, Mark Tees wrote:
>>
>> Morning everybody,
>>
>> I was wondering what people are using for LTE terminations these days.
>&g
//www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/interfaces-modules/4g-lte-wireless-wan-enhanced-high-speed-wan-interface-card/datasheet_c78-710314.html
>
> The Cradlepoints are upwards of $2000.
>
> Jamie
>
>
>
> On 22 May 2017 at 12:42, Mark Tees wrote:
>>
>> Morning e
Morning everybody,
I was wondering what people are using for LTE terminations these days.
Use case is simply a reliable interface for customer end site backup
links/internet traffic etc.
At present I have been suggesting using Cradlepoint IBR series hooked
into either Juniper or Cisco gear as th
25 matches
Mail list logo
