>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Sean Agius*
>
>
> Senior Engineer
>
>
>
>
>
> *p:*
>
>
>
>
>
> *+61 3 8592 8866 <+61385928866>*
>
>
> *+61 431 236 571 <+61431236571>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *u:*
>
>
>
>
>
> *http://www.pingco.com.au/ <http://www.pingco.com.au/>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <https://www.google.com/maps/search/Suite%0D%0A+114,+189E+S+Centre+Rd,+%0D%0A+Tullamarine%0D%0A+VIC+3043?entry=gmail&source=g>
>
>
>
> *a:*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Suite 114, 189E S Centre Rd, <https://goo.gl/maps/TKYaStRjEQEettUC7>*
>
>
>
>
> *Tullamarine VIC 3043 <https://goo.gl/maps/TKYaStRjEQEettUC7>*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
> AusNOG mailing list
>
> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
>
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
--
--
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
--
--
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
gt; *To:* AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] Dutton decryption bill
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bradley,
>>>>>
>>>>> The Common Law has always allowed judicial scrutiny of our privacy.
>>>>> There's always been the right for judicial search warrants to override
>>>>> what's considered one's private domain. I'm supportive of this bill where
>>>>> it extends judicial oversite to the cyber domain, which is a gap that
>>>>> exists only because legislation/common law has lagged behind technology.
>>>>> While at the same time realising that conversations conducted over the
>>>>> internet, even if encrypted, are more properly regarded as public
>>>>> conversations, than say one you might have in your living room. Whether
>>>>> government is going to regulate the internet, the boat has sailed on this
>>>>> long ago. The hard line privacy advocates are simply going to be left out
>>>>> of a conversation democracy needs to have over not whether the internet
>>>>> should be regulated, but how.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What's interesting in this bill is that it goes beyond extending
>>>>> judicial writ, allowing law enforcement emergency powers the right to
>>>>> surveil suspects. This will be authorised by law enforcement, without
>>>>> judicial or governmental oversite. I think this probably goes too far. The
>>>>> best outcome for everyone, to protect privacy, and to empower law
>>>>> enforcement to enforce laws and to protect citizens rights, would be to
>>>>> limit the scope of these new powers to judicial writ.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul Wilkins
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>>
>>>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>>>>
>>>>> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
>>>>>
>>>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>>>> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
>>>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>>> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
>>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>
>>> ___
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
--
--
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
OG@lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
--
--
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
We'll see how it does once they get to use WhatsApp like the UK
Conservative Party and realise the political fallout if the newpapers are
able to break this along with the voicemail!
--
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK
On 13 June 2017 at 08:57, Nathanael Bettridge
wrote:
> That’s